Cargando…

Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: The use of Web- or mobile phone–based apps for tracking health indicators has increased greatly. However, provider perceptions of consumer-grade devices have not been widely explored. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine primary care physicians’ and advanced practice reg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holtz, Bree, Vasold, Kerri, Cotten, Shelia, Mackert, Michael, Zhang, Mi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668515
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9929
_version_ 1783392906737876992
author Holtz, Bree
Vasold, Kerri
Cotten, Shelia
Mackert, Michael
Zhang, Mi
author_facet Holtz, Bree
Vasold, Kerri
Cotten, Shelia
Mackert, Michael
Zhang, Mi
author_sort Holtz, Bree
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The use of Web- or mobile phone–based apps for tracking health indicators has increased greatly. However, provider perceptions of consumer-grade devices have not been widely explored. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine primary care physicians’ and advanced practice registered nurses’ perceptions of consumer-grade sensor devices and Web- or mobile phone–based apps that allow patients to track physical activity, diet, and sleep. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional mailed survey with a random sample of 300 primary care physicians and 300 advanced practice registered nurses from Michigan, USA. Providers’ use and recommendation of these types of technologies, and their perceptions of the benefits of and barriers to patients’ use of the technologies for physical activity, diet, and sleep tracking were key outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Most of the respondents (189/562, 33.6% response rate) were advanced practice registered nurses (107/189, 56.6%). Almost half of the sample (93/189, 49.2%) owned or used behavioral tracking technologies. Providers found these technologies to be helpful in clinical encounters, trusted the data, perceived their patients to be interested in them, and did not have concerns over the privacy of the data. However, the providers did perceive patient barriers to using these technologies. Additionally, those who owned or used these technologies were up to 6.5 times more likely to recommend them to their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that many providers perceived benefits for their patients to use these technologies, including improved communication. Providers’ concerns included their patients’ access and the usability of these technologies. Providers who encountered data from these technologies during patient visits generally perceive this to be helpful. We additionally discuss the barriers perceived by the providers and offer suggestions and future research to realize the potential benefits to using these data in clinical encounters.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362391
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63623912019-02-22 Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study Holtz, Bree Vasold, Kerri Cotten, Shelia Mackert, Michael Zhang, Mi JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Original Paper BACKGROUND: The use of Web- or mobile phone–based apps for tracking health indicators has increased greatly. However, provider perceptions of consumer-grade devices have not been widely explored. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine primary care physicians’ and advanced practice registered nurses’ perceptions of consumer-grade sensor devices and Web- or mobile phone–based apps that allow patients to track physical activity, diet, and sleep. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional mailed survey with a random sample of 300 primary care physicians and 300 advanced practice registered nurses from Michigan, USA. Providers’ use and recommendation of these types of technologies, and their perceptions of the benefits of and barriers to patients’ use of the technologies for physical activity, diet, and sleep tracking were key outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Most of the respondents (189/562, 33.6% response rate) were advanced practice registered nurses (107/189, 56.6%). Almost half of the sample (93/189, 49.2%) owned or used behavioral tracking technologies. Providers found these technologies to be helpful in clinical encounters, trusted the data, perceived their patients to be interested in them, and did not have concerns over the privacy of the data. However, the providers did perceive patient barriers to using these technologies. Additionally, those who owned or used these technologies were up to 6.5 times more likely to recommend them to their patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that many providers perceived benefits for their patients to use these technologies, including improved communication. Providers’ concerns included their patients’ access and the usability of these technologies. Providers who encountered data from these technologies during patient visits generally perceive this to be helpful. We additionally discuss the barriers perceived by the providers and offer suggestions and future research to realize the potential benefits to using these data in clinical encounters. JMIR Publications 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6362391/ /pubmed/30668515 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9929 Text en ©Bree Holtz, Kerri Vasold, Shelia Cotten, Michael Mackert, Mi Zhang. Originally published in JMIR Mhealth and Uhealth (http://mhealth.jmir.org), 22.01.2019. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR mhealth and uhealth, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mhealth.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Holtz, Bree
Vasold, Kerri
Cotten, Shelia
Mackert, Michael
Zhang, Mi
Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study
title Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study
title_full Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study
title_short Health Care Provider Perceptions of Consumer-Grade Devices and Apps for Tracking Health: A Pilot Study
title_sort health care provider perceptions of consumer-grade devices and apps for tracking health: a pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362391/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30668515
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.9929
work_keys_str_mv AT holtzbree healthcareproviderperceptionsofconsumergradedevicesandappsfortrackinghealthapilotstudy
AT vasoldkerri healthcareproviderperceptionsofconsumergradedevicesandappsfortrackinghealthapilotstudy
AT cottenshelia healthcareproviderperceptionsofconsumergradedevicesandappsfortrackinghealthapilotstudy
AT mackertmichael healthcareproviderperceptionsofconsumergradedevicesandappsfortrackinghealthapilotstudy
AT zhangmi healthcareproviderperceptionsofconsumergradedevicesandappsfortrackinghealthapilotstudy