Cargando…

Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity

While currently used influenza vaccines are designed to induce neutralizing antibodies, little is known on T cell responses induced by these vaccines. The 2009 pandemic provided us with the opportunity to evaluate the immune response to vaccination in a unique setting. We evaluated both antibody and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosendahl Huber, Sietske K., Hendriks, Marion, Jacobi, Ronald H. J., van de Kassteele, Jan, Mandersloot-Oskam, Jolanda C., van Boxtel, Renée A. J., Wensing, Anne M. J., Rots, Nynke Y., Luytjes, Willem, van Beek, Josine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03103
_version_ 1783392913926914048
author Rosendahl Huber, Sietske K.
Hendriks, Marion
Jacobi, Ronald H. J.
van de Kassteele, Jan
Mandersloot-Oskam, Jolanda C.
van Boxtel, Renée A. J.
Wensing, Anne M. J.
Rots, Nynke Y.
Luytjes, Willem
van Beek, Josine
author_facet Rosendahl Huber, Sietske K.
Hendriks, Marion
Jacobi, Ronald H. J.
van de Kassteele, Jan
Mandersloot-Oskam, Jolanda C.
van Boxtel, Renée A. J.
Wensing, Anne M. J.
Rots, Nynke Y.
Luytjes, Willem
van Beek, Josine
author_sort Rosendahl Huber, Sietske K.
collection PubMed
description While currently used influenza vaccines are designed to induce neutralizing antibodies, little is known on T cell responses induced by these vaccines. The 2009 pandemic provided us with the opportunity to evaluate the immune response to vaccination in a unique setting. We evaluated both antibody and T cell responses in a cohort of public health care workers (18–52 years) during two consecutive influenza seasons from 2009 to 2011 and compared the MF59-adjuvanted pandemic vaccine with the unadjuvanted seasonal subunit vaccine that included the pandemic strain [The study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2070)]. Antibody responses were determined in serum by a hemagglutination inhibition assay. Vaccine-specific T cell responses were evaluated by detecting IFN-γ producing peripheral blood mononuclear cells using whole influenza virus or vaccine-specific peptide pools as stimulating antigens. Mixed effects regression models were used to correct the data for influenza-specific pre-existing immunity due to previous infections or vaccinations and for age and sex. We show that one dose of the pandemic vaccine induced antibody responses sufficient for providing seroprotection and that the vaccine induced T cell responses. A second dose further increased antibody responses but not T cell responses. Nonetheless, both could be boosted by the seasonal vaccine in the subsequent season. Furthermore, we show that the seasonal vaccine alone is capable of inducing vaccine-specific T cell responses, despite the fact that the vaccine did not contain an adjuvant. In addition, residual antibody levels remained detectable for over 15 months, while T cell levels in the blood had contracted to baseline levels by that time. Hereby, we show that pandemic as well as seasonal vaccines induce both humoral and cellular responses, however, with a different profile of induction and waning, which has its implications for future vaccine design.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63624242019-02-13 Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity Rosendahl Huber, Sietske K. Hendriks, Marion Jacobi, Ronald H. J. van de Kassteele, Jan Mandersloot-Oskam, Jolanda C. van Boxtel, Renée A. J. Wensing, Anne M. J. Rots, Nynke Y. Luytjes, Willem van Beek, Josine Front Immunol Immunology While currently used influenza vaccines are designed to induce neutralizing antibodies, little is known on T cell responses induced by these vaccines. The 2009 pandemic provided us with the opportunity to evaluate the immune response to vaccination in a unique setting. We evaluated both antibody and T cell responses in a cohort of public health care workers (18–52 years) during two consecutive influenza seasons from 2009 to 2011 and compared the MF59-adjuvanted pandemic vaccine with the unadjuvanted seasonal subunit vaccine that included the pandemic strain [The study was registered in the Netherlands Trial Register (NTR2070)]. Antibody responses were determined in serum by a hemagglutination inhibition assay. Vaccine-specific T cell responses were evaluated by detecting IFN-γ producing peripheral blood mononuclear cells using whole influenza virus or vaccine-specific peptide pools as stimulating antigens. Mixed effects regression models were used to correct the data for influenza-specific pre-existing immunity due to previous infections or vaccinations and for age and sex. We show that one dose of the pandemic vaccine induced antibody responses sufficient for providing seroprotection and that the vaccine induced T cell responses. A second dose further increased antibody responses but not T cell responses. Nonetheless, both could be boosted by the seasonal vaccine in the subsequent season. Furthermore, we show that the seasonal vaccine alone is capable of inducing vaccine-specific T cell responses, despite the fact that the vaccine did not contain an adjuvant. In addition, residual antibody levels remained detectable for over 15 months, while T cell levels in the blood had contracted to baseline levels by that time. Hereby, we show that pandemic as well as seasonal vaccines induce both humoral and cellular responses, however, with a different profile of induction and waning, which has its implications for future vaccine design. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-29 /pmc/articles/PMC6362424/ /pubmed/30761157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03103 Text en Copyright © 2019 Rosendahl Huber, Hendriks, Jacobi, van de Kassteele, Mandersloot-Oskam, van Boxtel, Wensing, Rots, Luytjes and van Beek. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Rosendahl Huber, Sietske K.
Hendriks, Marion
Jacobi, Ronald H. J.
van de Kassteele, Jan
Mandersloot-Oskam, Jolanda C.
van Boxtel, Renée A. J.
Wensing, Anne M. J.
Rots, Nynke Y.
Luytjes, Willem
van Beek, Josine
Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity
title Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity
title_full Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity
title_fullStr Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity
title_full_unstemmed Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity
title_short Immunogenicity of Influenza Vaccines: Evidence for Differential Effect of Secondary Vaccination on Humoral and Cellular Immunity
title_sort immunogenicity of influenza vaccines: evidence for differential effect of secondary vaccination on humoral and cellular immunity
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.03103
work_keys_str_mv AT rosendahlhubersietskek immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT hendriksmarion immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT jacobironaldhj immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT vandekassteelejan immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT manderslootoskamjolandac immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT vanboxtelreneeaj immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT wensingannemj immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT rotsnynkey immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT luytjeswillem immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity
AT vanbeekjosine immunogenicityofinfluenzavaccinesevidencefordifferentialeffectofsecondaryvaccinationonhumoralandcellularimmunity