Cargando…
Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses
Many biological quantities cannot be measured directly but rather need to be estimated from models. Estimates from models are statistical objects with variance and, when derived simultaneously, covariance. It is well known that their variance–covariance (VC) matrix must be considered in subsequent a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4827 |
_version_ | 1783392918527016960 |
---|---|
author | Guéry, Loreleï Rouan, Lauriane Descamps, Sébastien Bêty, Joël Fernández‐Chacón, Albert Gilchrist, Grant Pradel, Roger |
author_facet | Guéry, Loreleï Rouan, Lauriane Descamps, Sébastien Bêty, Joël Fernández‐Chacón, Albert Gilchrist, Grant Pradel, Roger |
author_sort | Guéry, Loreleï |
collection | PubMed |
description | Many biological quantities cannot be measured directly but rather need to be estimated from models. Estimates from models are statistical objects with variance and, when derived simultaneously, covariance. It is well known that their variance–covariance (VC) matrix must be considered in subsequent analyses. Although it is always preferable to carry out the proposed analyses on the raw data themselves, a two‐step approach cannot always be avoided. This situation arises when the parameters of a multinomial must be regressed against a covariate. The Delta method is an appropriate and frequently recommended way of deriving variance approximations of transformed and correlated variables. Implementing the Delta method is not trivial, and there is a lack of a detailed information on the procedure in the literature for complex situations such as those involved in constraining the parameters of a multinomial distribution. This paper proposes a how‐to guide for calculating the correct VC matrices of dependant estimates involved in multinomial distributions and how to use them for testing the effects of covariates in post hoc analyses when the integration of these analyses directly into a model is not possible. For illustrative purpose, we focus on variables calculated in capture–recapture models, but the same procedure can be applied to all analyses dealing with correlated estimates with multinomial distribution and their variances and covariances. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6362441 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63624412019-02-14 Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses Guéry, Loreleï Rouan, Lauriane Descamps, Sébastien Bêty, Joël Fernández‐Chacón, Albert Gilchrist, Grant Pradel, Roger Ecol Evol Original Research Many biological quantities cannot be measured directly but rather need to be estimated from models. Estimates from models are statistical objects with variance and, when derived simultaneously, covariance. It is well known that their variance–covariance (VC) matrix must be considered in subsequent analyses. Although it is always preferable to carry out the proposed analyses on the raw data themselves, a two‐step approach cannot always be avoided. This situation arises when the parameters of a multinomial must be regressed against a covariate. The Delta method is an appropriate and frequently recommended way of deriving variance approximations of transformed and correlated variables. Implementing the Delta method is not trivial, and there is a lack of a detailed information on the procedure in the literature for complex situations such as those involved in constraining the parameters of a multinomial distribution. This paper proposes a how‐to guide for calculating the correct VC matrices of dependant estimates involved in multinomial distributions and how to use them for testing the effects of covariates in post hoc analyses when the integration of these analyses directly into a model is not possible. For illustrative purpose, we focus on variables calculated in capture–recapture models, but the same procedure can be applied to all analyses dealing with correlated estimates with multinomial distribution and their variances and covariances. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6362441/ /pubmed/30766671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4827 Text en © 2019 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Guéry, Loreleï Rouan, Lauriane Descamps, Sébastien Bêty, Joël Fernández‐Chacón, Albert Gilchrist, Grant Pradel, Roger Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
title | Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
title_full | Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
title_fullStr | Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
title_full_unstemmed | Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
title_short | Covariate and multinomial: Accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
title_sort | covariate and multinomial: accounting for distance in movement in capture–recapture analyses |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362441/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4827 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT guerylorelei covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses AT rouanlauriane covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses AT descampssebastien covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses AT betyjoel covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses AT fernandezchaconalbert covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses AT gilchristgrant covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses AT pradelroger covariateandmultinomialaccountingfordistanceinmovementincapturerecaptureanalyses |