Cargando…

Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation

Multispecies occupancy models can estimate species richness from spatially replicated multispecies detection/non‐detection survey data, while accounting for imperfect detection. A model extension using data augmentation allows inferring the total number of species in the community, including those c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta, Kéry, Marc, Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4821
_version_ 1783392921010044928
author Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta
Kéry, Marc
Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.
author_facet Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta
Kéry, Marc
Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.
author_sort Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta
collection PubMed
description Multispecies occupancy models can estimate species richness from spatially replicated multispecies detection/non‐detection survey data, while accounting for imperfect detection. A model extension using data augmentation allows inferring the total number of species in the community, including those completely missed by sampling (i.e., not detected in any survey, at any site). Here we investigate the robustness of these estimates. We review key model assumptions and test performance via simulations, under a range of scenarios of species characteristics and sampling regimes, exploring sensitivity to the Bayesian priors used for model fitting. We run tests when assumptions are perfectly met and when violated. We apply the model to a real dataset and contrast estimates obtained with and without predictors, and for different subsets of data. We find that, even with model assumptions perfectly met, estimation of the total number of species can be poor in scenarios where many species are missed (>15%–20%) and that commonly used priors can accentuate overestimation. Our tests show that estimation can often be robust to violations of assumptions about the statistical distributions describing variation of occupancy and detectability among species, but lower‐tail deviations can result in large biases. We obtain substantially different estimates from alternative analyses of our real dataset, with results suggesting that missing relevant predictors in the model can result in richness underestimation. In summary, estimates of total richness are sensitive to model structure and often uncertain. Appropriate selection of priors, testing of assumptions, and model refinement are all important to enhance estimator performance. Yet, these do not guarantee accurate estimation, particularly when many species remain undetected. While statistical models can provide useful insights, expectations about accuracy in this challenging prediction task should be realistic. Where knowledge about species numbers is considered truly critical for management or policy, survey effort should ideally be such that the chances of missing species altogether are low.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63624482019-02-14 Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta Kéry, Marc Lahoz‐Monfort, José J. Ecol Evol Original Research Multispecies occupancy models can estimate species richness from spatially replicated multispecies detection/non‐detection survey data, while accounting for imperfect detection. A model extension using data augmentation allows inferring the total number of species in the community, including those completely missed by sampling (i.e., not detected in any survey, at any site). Here we investigate the robustness of these estimates. We review key model assumptions and test performance via simulations, under a range of scenarios of species characteristics and sampling regimes, exploring sensitivity to the Bayesian priors used for model fitting. We run tests when assumptions are perfectly met and when violated. We apply the model to a real dataset and contrast estimates obtained with and without predictors, and for different subsets of data. We find that, even with model assumptions perfectly met, estimation of the total number of species can be poor in scenarios where many species are missed (>15%–20%) and that commonly used priors can accentuate overestimation. Our tests show that estimation can often be robust to violations of assumptions about the statistical distributions describing variation of occupancy and detectability among species, but lower‐tail deviations can result in large biases. We obtain substantially different estimates from alternative analyses of our real dataset, with results suggesting that missing relevant predictors in the model can result in richness underestimation. In summary, estimates of total richness are sensitive to model structure and often uncertain. Appropriate selection of priors, testing of assumptions, and model refinement are all important to enhance estimator performance. Yet, these do not guarantee accurate estimation, particularly when many species remain undetected. While statistical models can provide useful insights, expectations about accuracy in this challenging prediction task should be realistic. Where knowledge about species numbers is considered truly critical for management or policy, survey effort should ideally be such that the chances of missing species altogether are low. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6362448/ /pubmed/30766668 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4821 Text en © 2018 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Guillera‐Arroita, Gurutzeta
Kéry, Marc
Lahoz‐Monfort, José J.
Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation
title Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation
title_full Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation
title_fullStr Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation
title_full_unstemmed Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation
title_short Inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: Estimation performance and interpretation
title_sort inferring species richness using multispecies occupancy modeling: estimation performance and interpretation
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766668
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4821
work_keys_str_mv AT guilleraarroitagurutzeta inferringspeciesrichnessusingmultispeciesoccupancymodelingestimationperformanceandinterpretation
AT kerymarc inferringspeciesrichnessusingmultispeciesoccupancymodelingestimationperformanceandinterpretation
AT lahozmonfortjosej inferringspeciesrichnessusingmultispeciesoccupancymodelingestimationperformanceandinterpretation