Cargando…

Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm

AIM: The aim of this study is to report root coverage outcomes in single deep gingival recessions (GR) following a proposed decision-making algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, practice-based study included single deep (≥5 mm) Miller Class II and III defects. The step-by-step decision-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: César Neto, João B., Cavalcanti, Marília C., Sekiguchi, Ricardo T., Pannuti, Claudio M., Romito, Giuseppe A., Tatakis, Dimitris N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1830765
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The aim of this study is to report root coverage outcomes in single deep gingival recessions (GR) following a proposed decision-making algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, practice-based study included single deep (≥5 mm) Miller Class II and III defects. The step-by-step decision-making algorithm led to a choice among three different flap designs (coronally advanced flap (CAF), double papilla envelope flap (DPE) or modified lateral sliding flap (LSF)) used with a connective tissue graft. Recession depth (RD) at 6 months follow-up and the corresponding root coverage (RC) were the primary outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Sixteen GR defects were included, with baseline RD of 6.7 ± 1.8 mm. Six months postoperatively, RD was significantly reduced to 1.2 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.05). Mean RC was 81.7 ± 13.0%, without significant differences between Miller Class II (87.1 ± 9.2%; n=9) and Class III (74.6 ± 14.5%; n=7) GRs (p=0.07). Postoperatively, keratinized tissue width increase was greater for LSF (3.5 ± 1.1) and DPE (4.2 ± 1.4 mm) than for CAF (1.9 ± 0.9 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Following the proposed decision-making algorithm, root coverage outcomes for GR defects ≥5 mm were comparable to outcomes reported for shallow defects. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the proposed approach and techniques. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The proposed algorithm allows the clinician to select the appropriate surgical technique for treatment of single deep gingival recessions with good predictability.