Cargando…

Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm

AIM: The aim of this study is to report root coverage outcomes in single deep gingival recessions (GR) following a proposed decision-making algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, practice-based study included single deep (≥5 mm) Miller Class II and III defects. The step-by-step decision-...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: César Neto, João B., Cavalcanti, Marília C., Sekiguchi, Ricardo T., Pannuti, Claudio M., Romito, Giuseppe A., Tatakis, Dimitris N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1830765
_version_ 1783392929198374912
author César Neto, João B.
Cavalcanti, Marília C.
Sekiguchi, Ricardo T.
Pannuti, Claudio M.
Romito, Giuseppe A.
Tatakis, Dimitris N.
author_facet César Neto, João B.
Cavalcanti, Marília C.
Sekiguchi, Ricardo T.
Pannuti, Claudio M.
Romito, Giuseppe A.
Tatakis, Dimitris N.
author_sort César Neto, João B.
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim of this study is to report root coverage outcomes in single deep gingival recessions (GR) following a proposed decision-making algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, practice-based study included single deep (≥5 mm) Miller Class II and III defects. The step-by-step decision-making algorithm led to a choice among three different flap designs (coronally advanced flap (CAF), double papilla envelope flap (DPE) or modified lateral sliding flap (LSF)) used with a connective tissue graft. Recession depth (RD) at 6 months follow-up and the corresponding root coverage (RC) were the primary outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Sixteen GR defects were included, with baseline RD of 6.7 ± 1.8 mm. Six months postoperatively, RD was significantly reduced to 1.2 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.05). Mean RC was 81.7 ± 13.0%, without significant differences between Miller Class II (87.1 ± 9.2%; n=9) and Class III (74.6 ± 14.5%; n=7) GRs (p=0.07). Postoperatively, keratinized tissue width increase was greater for LSF (3.5 ± 1.1) and DPE (4.2 ± 1.4 mm) than for CAF (1.9 ± 0.9 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Following the proposed decision-making algorithm, root coverage outcomes for GR defects ≥5 mm were comparable to outcomes reported for shallow defects. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the proposed approach and techniques. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The proposed algorithm allows the clinician to select the appropriate surgical technique for treatment of single deep gingival recessions with good predictability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362491
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63624912019-02-25 Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm César Neto, João B. Cavalcanti, Marília C. Sekiguchi, Ricardo T. Pannuti, Claudio M. Romito, Giuseppe A. Tatakis, Dimitris N. Int J Dent Research Article AIM: The aim of this study is to report root coverage outcomes in single deep gingival recessions (GR) following a proposed decision-making algorithm. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective, practice-based study included single deep (≥5 mm) Miller Class II and III defects. The step-by-step decision-making algorithm led to a choice among three different flap designs (coronally advanced flap (CAF), double papilla envelope flap (DPE) or modified lateral sliding flap (LSF)) used with a connective tissue graft. Recession depth (RD) at 6 months follow-up and the corresponding root coverage (RC) were the primary outcomes assessed. RESULTS: Sixteen GR defects were included, with baseline RD of 6.7 ± 1.8 mm. Six months postoperatively, RD was significantly reduced to 1.2 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.05). Mean RC was 81.7 ± 13.0%, without significant differences between Miller Class II (87.1 ± 9.2%; n=9) and Class III (74.6 ± 14.5%; n=7) GRs (p=0.07). Postoperatively, keratinized tissue width increase was greater for LSF (3.5 ± 1.1) and DPE (4.2 ± 1.4 mm) than for CAF (1.9 ± 0.9 mm). CONCLUSIONS: Following the proposed decision-making algorithm, root coverage outcomes for GR defects ≥5 mm were comparable to outcomes reported for shallow defects. Prospective clinical trials are needed to validate the proposed approach and techniques. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The proposed algorithm allows the clinician to select the appropriate surgical technique for treatment of single deep gingival recessions with good predictability. Hindawi 2019-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC6362491/ /pubmed/30805000 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1830765 Text en Copyright © 2019 João B. César Neto et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
César Neto, João B.
Cavalcanti, Marília C.
Sekiguchi, Ricardo T.
Pannuti, Claudio M.
Romito, Giuseppe A.
Tatakis, Dimitris N.
Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm
title Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm
title_full Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm
title_fullStr Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm
title_full_unstemmed Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm
title_short Root Coverage for Single Deep Gingival Recessions: Outcomes Based on a Decision-Making Algorithm
title_sort root coverage for single deep gingival recessions: outcomes based on a decision-making algorithm
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362491/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30805000
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/1830765
work_keys_str_mv AT cesarnetojoaob rootcoverageforsingledeepgingivalrecessionsoutcomesbasedonadecisionmakingalgorithm
AT cavalcantimariliac rootcoverageforsingledeepgingivalrecessionsoutcomesbasedonadecisionmakingalgorithm
AT sekiguchiricardot rootcoverageforsingledeepgingivalrecessionsoutcomesbasedonadecisionmakingalgorithm
AT pannuticlaudiom rootcoverageforsingledeepgingivalrecessionsoutcomesbasedonadecisionmakingalgorithm
AT romitogiuseppea rootcoverageforsingledeepgingivalrecessionsoutcomesbasedonadecisionmakingalgorithm
AT tatakisdimitrisn rootcoverageforsingledeepgingivalrecessionsoutcomesbasedonadecisionmakingalgorithm