Cargando…
Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Determine the indications, complications, and clinical outcomes in patients requiring fusions from the cervical spine to the pelvis. Several investigators have examined fusions from the thoracic spine to the sacrum, but no similar study has been p...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217705655 |
_version_ | 1783392940207374336 |
---|---|
author | Iyer, Sravisht Kim, Han Jo Theologis, Alexander Nemani, Venu M. Albert, Todd J. Lenke, Lawrence G. Burch, Shane Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba Deviren, Vedat Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. Smith, Justin S. Scheer, Justin K. Mizutani, Jun Kleinberg, Eric O. Ames, Christopher P. |
author_facet | Iyer, Sravisht Kim, Han Jo Theologis, Alexander Nemani, Venu M. Albert, Todd J. Lenke, Lawrence G. Burch, Shane Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba Deviren, Vedat Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. Smith, Justin S. Scheer, Justin K. Mizutani, Jun Kleinberg, Eric O. Ames, Christopher P. |
author_sort | Iyer, Sravisht |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Determine the indications, complications, and clinical outcomes in patients requiring fusions from the cervical spine to the pelvis. Several investigators have examined fusions from the thoracic spine to the sacrum, but no similar study has been performed for cervical-to-pelvis fusions. METHODS: Patients from 2003 to 2014 with an upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) in the cervical spine (any level) and a lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) in the sacrum or pelvis were included in the study. Those with infectious or acute trauma-related deformities were excluded. Patient demographics, medical history, diagnosis, operative procedure, and health-related quality of life measures were analyzed. Student’s t test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and χ(2) test were used as appropriate; significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Average follow-up was 2.8 years. Proximal junctional kyphosis was the most common indication for cervical-to-pelvis fusions (36%). The most common UIV was C2 (29%) followed by C7 (24%). There was an average 31° correction in maximum kyphosis and a 3.3 cm improvement in sagittal vertical axis. In adults, the rate of complication was 71.4%, with a major complication rate of 39.3% and reoperation rate of 53.6%. There was significant improvement in the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) score (3.0 to 3.5; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Proximal junctional kyphosis is the most common indication for patients requiring fusion to the cervical spine. Adult patients incur a significant risk of major complications and reoperations. However, significant improvement in SRS-22r outcomes are noted in these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6362548 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63625482019-02-15 Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis Iyer, Sravisht Kim, Han Jo Theologis, Alexander Nemani, Venu M. Albert, Todd J. Lenke, Lawrence G. Burch, Shane Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba Deviren, Vedat Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. Smith, Justin S. Scheer, Justin K. Mizutani, Jun Kleinberg, Eric O. Ames, Christopher P. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: Determine the indications, complications, and clinical outcomes in patients requiring fusions from the cervical spine to the pelvis. Several investigators have examined fusions from the thoracic spine to the sacrum, but no similar study has been performed for cervical-to-pelvis fusions. METHODS: Patients from 2003 to 2014 with an upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) in the cervical spine (any level) and a lower instrumented vertebrae (LIV) in the sacrum or pelvis were included in the study. Those with infectious or acute trauma-related deformities were excluded. Patient demographics, medical history, diagnosis, operative procedure, and health-related quality of life measures were analyzed. Student’s t test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and χ(2) test were used as appropriate; significance was set at P < .05 for all tests. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria for the study. Average follow-up was 2.8 years. Proximal junctional kyphosis was the most common indication for cervical-to-pelvis fusions (36%). The most common UIV was C2 (29%) followed by C7 (24%). There was an average 31° correction in maximum kyphosis and a 3.3 cm improvement in sagittal vertical axis. In adults, the rate of complication was 71.4%, with a major complication rate of 39.3% and reoperation rate of 53.6%. There was significant improvement in the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS-22r) score (3.0 to 3.5; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Proximal junctional kyphosis is the most common indication for patients requiring fusion to the cervical spine. Adult patients incur a significant risk of major complications and reoperations. However, significant improvement in SRS-22r outcomes are noted in these patients. SAGE Publications 2018-05-10 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6362548/ /pubmed/30775202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217705655 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Iyer, Sravisht Kim, Han Jo Theologis, Alexander Nemani, Venu M. Albert, Todd J. Lenke, Lawrence G. Burch, Shane Boachie-Adjei, Oheneba Deviren, Vedat Protopsaltis, Themistocles S. Smith, Justin S. Scheer, Justin K. Mizutani, Jun Kleinberg, Eric O. Ames, Christopher P. Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis |
title | Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis |
title_full | Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis |
title_fullStr | Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis |
title_full_unstemmed | Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis |
title_short | Outcomes of Fusions From the Cervical Spine to the Pelvis |
title_sort | outcomes of fusions from the cervical spine to the pelvis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362548/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775202 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568217705655 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iyersravisht outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT kimhanjo outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT theologisalexander outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT nemanivenum outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT alberttoddj outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT lenkelawrenceg outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT burchshane outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT boachieadjeioheneba outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT devirenvedat outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT protopsaltisthemistocless outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT smithjustins outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT scheerjustink outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT mizutanijun outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT kleinbergerico outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis AT ameschristopherp outcomesoffusionsfromthecervicalspinetothepelvis |