Cargando…
Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence. METHODS: Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780676 |
_version_ | 1783392941827424256 |
---|---|
author | Agarwal, Aakash Lin, Boren Wang, Jeffrey C. Schultz, Christian Garfin, Steve R. Goel, Vijay K. Anand, Neel Agarwal, Anand K. |
author_facet | Agarwal, Aakash Lin, Boren Wang, Jeffrey C. Schultz, Christian Garfin, Steve R. Goel, Vijay K. Anand, Neel Agarwal, Anand K. |
author_sort | Agarwal, Aakash |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence. METHODS: Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one with an intraoperative guard (group 1) and the other without such a guard (group 2), each consisting of 5 samples distributed over 3 time points, were loaded onto the insertion device by the scrub tech and left on the sterile table. Approximately 20 minutes later, the lead surgeon who had just finished preparing the surgical site touches the pedicle screw. Then instead of implantation it was transferred to a sterile container using fresh clean gloves for bacterial and gene analysis. Guarded screw implies that even after unwrapping from the package, the screw carries an impermeable barrier along its entire length, which is only removed seconds prior to implantation. RESULTS: The standard unguarded pedicle screws presented bioburden in the range of 10(5) to 10(7) (colony forming units/implant) with bacterial genus mostly consisting of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, the 2 most common genera found in surgical site infection reports. The common species among them were Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus pettenkoferi, whereas the guarded pedicle screws showed no bioburden. CONCLUSIONS: Shielding the pedicle screws intraoperatively using a guard provides a superior level of asepsis than currently practiced. All unshielded pedicles screws were carrying bioburden of virulent bacterial species, which provides an opportunity for the development of postoperative infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6362554 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63625542019-02-15 Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination Agarwal, Aakash Lin, Boren Wang, Jeffrey C. Schultz, Christian Garfin, Steve R. Goel, Vijay K. Anand, Neel Agarwal, Anand K. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence. METHODS: Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one with an intraoperative guard (group 1) and the other without such a guard (group 2), each consisting of 5 samples distributed over 3 time points, were loaded onto the insertion device by the scrub tech and left on the sterile table. Approximately 20 minutes later, the lead surgeon who had just finished preparing the surgical site touches the pedicle screw. Then instead of implantation it was transferred to a sterile container using fresh clean gloves for bacterial and gene analysis. Guarded screw implies that even after unwrapping from the package, the screw carries an impermeable barrier along its entire length, which is only removed seconds prior to implantation. RESULTS: The standard unguarded pedicle screws presented bioburden in the range of 10(5) to 10(7) (colony forming units/implant) with bacterial genus mostly consisting of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, the 2 most common genera found in surgical site infection reports. The common species among them were Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus pettenkoferi, whereas the guarded pedicle screws showed no bioburden. CONCLUSIONS: Shielding the pedicle screws intraoperatively using a guard provides a superior level of asepsis than currently practiced. All unshielded pedicles screws were carrying bioburden of virulent bacterial species, which provides an opportunity for the development of postoperative infections. SAGE Publications 2018-06-12 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6362554/ /pubmed/30775210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780676 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Agarwal, Aakash Lin, Boren Wang, Jeffrey C. Schultz, Christian Garfin, Steve R. Goel, Vijay K. Anand, Neel Agarwal, Anand K. Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination |
title | Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination |
title_full | Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination |
title_short | Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination |
title_sort | efficacy of intraoperative implant prophylaxis in reducing intraoperative microbial contamination |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362554/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780676 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT agarwalaakash efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT linboren efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT wangjeffreyc efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT schultzchristian efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT garfinstever efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT goelvijayk efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT anandneel efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination AT agarwalanandk efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination |