Cargando…

Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence. METHODS: Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agarwal, Aakash, Lin, Boren, Wang, Jeffrey C., Schultz, Christian, Garfin, Steve R., Goel, Vijay K., Anand, Neel, Agarwal, Anand K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780676
_version_ 1783392941827424256
author Agarwal, Aakash
Lin, Boren
Wang, Jeffrey C.
Schultz, Christian
Garfin, Steve R.
Goel, Vijay K.
Anand, Neel
Agarwal, Anand K.
author_facet Agarwal, Aakash
Lin, Boren
Wang, Jeffrey C.
Schultz, Christian
Garfin, Steve R.
Goel, Vijay K.
Anand, Neel
Agarwal, Anand K.
author_sort Agarwal, Aakash
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence. METHODS: Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one with an intraoperative guard (group 1) and the other without such a guard (group 2), each consisting of 5 samples distributed over 3 time points, were loaded onto the insertion device by the scrub tech and left on the sterile table. Approximately 20 minutes later, the lead surgeon who had just finished preparing the surgical site touches the pedicle screw. Then instead of implantation it was transferred to a sterile container using fresh clean gloves for bacterial and gene analysis. Guarded screw implies that even after unwrapping from the package, the screw carries an impermeable barrier along its entire length, which is only removed seconds prior to implantation. RESULTS: The standard unguarded pedicle screws presented bioburden in the range of 10(5) to 10(7) (colony forming units/implant) with bacterial genus mostly consisting of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, the 2 most common genera found in surgical site infection reports. The common species among them were Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus pettenkoferi, whereas the guarded pedicle screws showed no bioburden. CONCLUSIONS: Shielding the pedicle screws intraoperatively using a guard provides a superior level of asepsis than currently practiced. All unshielded pedicles screws were carrying bioburden of virulent bacterial species, which provides an opportunity for the development of postoperative infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63625542019-02-15 Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination Agarwal, Aakash Lin, Boren Wang, Jeffrey C. Schultz, Christian Garfin, Steve R. Goel, Vijay K. Anand, Neel Agarwal, Anand K. Global Spine J Original Articles STUDY DESIGN: A prospective single-center study. OBJECTIVES: Assess to what degree contamination of pedicle screws occur in standard intraoperative practice and if use of an impermeable guard could mitigate or reduce such an occurrence. METHODS: Two groups of sterile prepackaged pedicle screws, one with an intraoperative guard (group 1) and the other without such a guard (group 2), each consisting of 5 samples distributed over 3 time points, were loaded onto the insertion device by the scrub tech and left on the sterile table. Approximately 20 minutes later, the lead surgeon who had just finished preparing the surgical site touches the pedicle screw. Then instead of implantation it was transferred to a sterile container using fresh clean gloves for bacterial and gene analysis. Guarded screw implies that even after unwrapping from the package, the screw carries an impermeable barrier along its entire length, which is only removed seconds prior to implantation. RESULTS: The standard unguarded pedicle screws presented bioburden in the range of 10(5) to 10(7) (colony forming units/implant) with bacterial genus mostly consisting of Staphylococcus and Micrococcus, the 2 most common genera found in surgical site infection reports. The common species among them were Staphylococcus epidermis, Staphylococcus aureus, Micrococcus luteus, and Staphylococcus pettenkoferi, whereas the guarded pedicle screws showed no bioburden. CONCLUSIONS: Shielding the pedicle screws intraoperatively using a guard provides a superior level of asepsis than currently practiced. All unshielded pedicles screws were carrying bioburden of virulent bacterial species, which provides an opportunity for the development of postoperative infections. SAGE Publications 2018-06-12 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6362554/ /pubmed/30775210 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780676 Text en © The Author(s) 2018 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Articles
Agarwal, Aakash
Lin, Boren
Wang, Jeffrey C.
Schultz, Christian
Garfin, Steve R.
Goel, Vijay K.
Anand, Neel
Agarwal, Anand K.
Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
title Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
title_full Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
title_fullStr Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
title_short Efficacy of Intraoperative Implant Prophylaxis in Reducing Intraoperative Microbial Contamination
title_sort efficacy of intraoperative implant prophylaxis in reducing intraoperative microbial contamination
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775210
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2192568218780676
work_keys_str_mv AT agarwalaakash efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT linboren efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT wangjeffreyc efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT schultzchristian efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT garfinstever efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT goelvijayk efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT anandneel efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination
AT agarwalanandk efficacyofintraoperativeimplantprophylaxisinreducingintraoperativemicrobialcontamination