Cargando…

Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis ineligible for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or at increased perioperative risk. Due to continually emerging evidence, we performed a systematic revie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagner, Gernot, Steiner, Sabine, Gartlehner, Gerald, Arfsten, Henrike, Wildner, Brigitte, Mayr, Harald, Moertl, Deddo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30722786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0954-3
_version_ 1783392946011242496
author Wagner, Gernot
Steiner, Sabine
Gartlehner, Gerald
Arfsten, Henrike
Wildner, Brigitte
Mayr, Harald
Moertl, Deddo
author_facet Wagner, Gernot
Steiner, Sabine
Gartlehner, Gerald
Arfsten, Henrike
Wildner, Brigitte
Mayr, Harald
Moertl, Deddo
author_sort Wagner, Gernot
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis ineligible for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or at increased perioperative risk. Due to continually emerging evidence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing benefits and harms of TAVI, SAVR, medical therapy, and balloon aortic valvuloplasty. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2002 to June 6, 2017. We dually screened abstracts and full-text articles for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched observational studies. Two investigators independently rated the risk of bias of included studies and determined the certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). If data permitted, we performed meta-analyses using random- and fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Out of 7755 citations, we included six RCTs (5862 patients) and 13 observational studies (6376 patients). In meta-analyses, patients treated with SAVR or TAVI had similar risks for mortality at 30 days (relative risk [RR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.33) and 1 year (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13). TAVI had significantly lower risks for major bleeding but increased risks for major vascular complications, moderate or severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and new pacemaker implantation compared to SAVR. Comparing TAVI to medical therapy, mortality did not differ at 30 days but was significantly reduced at 1 year (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Given similar mortality risks but different patterns of adverse events, the choice between TAVI and SAVR remains an individual one. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-0954-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362570
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63625702019-02-14 Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Wagner, Gernot Steiner, Sabine Gartlehner, Gerald Arfsten, Henrike Wildner, Brigitte Mayr, Harald Moertl, Deddo Syst Rev Research BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVI) is an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis ineligible for surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or at increased perioperative risk. Due to continually emerging evidence, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing benefits and harms of TAVI, SAVR, medical therapy, and balloon aortic valvuloplasty. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL from 2002 to June 6, 2017. We dually screened abstracts and full-text articles for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and propensity score-matched observational studies. Two investigators independently rated the risk of bias of included studies and determined the certainty of evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). If data permitted, we performed meta-analyses using random- and fixed-effects models. RESULTS: Out of 7755 citations, we included six RCTs (5862 patients) and 13 observational studies (6376 patients). In meta-analyses, patients treated with SAVR or TAVI had similar risks for mortality at 30 days (relative risk [RR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.82 to 1.33) and 1 year (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.93 to 1.13). TAVI had significantly lower risks for major bleeding but increased risks for major vascular complications, moderate or severe paravalvular aortic regurgitation, and new pacemaker implantation compared to SAVR. Comparing TAVI to medical therapy, mortality did not differ at 30 days but was significantly reduced at 1 year (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: Given similar mortality risks but different patterns of adverse events, the choice between TAVI and SAVR remains an individual one. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13643-019-0954-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6362570/ /pubmed/30722786 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0954-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Wagner, Gernot
Steiner, Sabine
Gartlehner, Gerald
Arfsten, Henrike
Wildner, Brigitte
Mayr, Harald
Moertl, Deddo
Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort comparison of transcatheter aortic valve implantation with other approaches to treat aortic valve stenosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362570/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30722786
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-019-0954-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wagnergernot comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT steinersabine comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT gartlehnergerald comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT arfstenhenrike comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wildnerbrigitte comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT mayrharald comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT moertldeddo comparisonoftranscatheteraorticvalveimplantationwithotherapproachestotreataorticvalvestenosisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis