Cargando…

Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors

BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) programmes for the control of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana, have been ongoing in some endemic districts for 16 years. The current study aimed to assess factors that govern the success of MDA programmes for breaking transmission of lymphatic filariasis in G...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pi-Bansa, Sellase, Osei, Joseph Harold Nyarko, Frempong, Kwadwo Kyeremeh, Elhassan, Elizabeth, Akuoko, Osei Kweku, Agyemang, David, Ahorlu, Collins, Appawu, Maxwell Alexander, Koudou, Benjamin Guibehi, Wilson, Michael David, de Souza, Dziedzom Komi, Dadzie, Samuel Kweku, Utzinger, Jürg, Boakye, Daniel Adjei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0520-1
_version_ 1783392954719666176
author Pi-Bansa, Sellase
Osei, Joseph Harold Nyarko
Frempong, Kwadwo Kyeremeh
Elhassan, Elizabeth
Akuoko, Osei Kweku
Agyemang, David
Ahorlu, Collins
Appawu, Maxwell Alexander
Koudou, Benjamin Guibehi
Wilson, Michael David
de Souza, Dziedzom Komi
Dadzie, Samuel Kweku
Utzinger, Jürg
Boakye, Daniel Adjei
author_facet Pi-Bansa, Sellase
Osei, Joseph Harold Nyarko
Frempong, Kwadwo Kyeremeh
Elhassan, Elizabeth
Akuoko, Osei Kweku
Agyemang, David
Ahorlu, Collins
Appawu, Maxwell Alexander
Koudou, Benjamin Guibehi
Wilson, Michael David
de Souza, Dziedzom Komi
Dadzie, Samuel Kweku
Utzinger, Jürg
Boakye, Daniel Adjei
author_sort Pi-Bansa, Sellase
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) programmes for the control of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana, have been ongoing in some endemic districts for 16 years. The current study aimed to assess factors that govern the success of MDA programmes for breaking transmission of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana. METHODS: The study was undertaken in two “hotspot” districts (Ahanta West and Kassena Nankana West) and two control districts (Mpohor and Bongo) in Ghana. Mosquitoes were collected and identified using morphological and molecular tools. A proportion of the cibarial armatures of each species was examined. Dissections were performed on Anopheles gambiae for filarial worm detection. A questionnaire was administered to obtain information on MDA compliance and vector control activities. Data were compared between districts to determine factors that might explain persistent transmission of lymphatic filariasis. RESULTS: High numbers of mosquitoes were sampled in Ahanta West district compared to Mpohor district (F = 16.09, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the numbers of mosquitoes collected in Kassena Nankana West and Bongo districts (F = 2.16, P = 0.185). Mansonia species were predominant in Ahanta West district. An. coluzzii mosquitoes were prevalent in all districts. An. melas with infected and infective filarial worms was found only in Ahanta West district. No differences were found in cibarial teeth numbers and shape for mosquito species in the surveyed districts. Reported MDA coverage was high in all districts. The average use of bednet and indoor residual spraying was 82.4 and 66.2%, respectively. There was high compliance in the five preceding MDA rounds in Ahanta West and Kassena Nankana West districts, both considered hotspots of lymphatic filariasis transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The study on persistent transmission of lymphatic filariasis in the two areas in Ghana present information that shows the importance of local understanding of factors affecting control and elimination of lymphatic filariasis. Unlike Kassena Nankana West district where transmission dynamics could be explained by initial infection prevalence and low vector densities, ongoing lymphatic filariasis transmission in Ahanta West district might be explained by high biting rates of An. gambiae and initial infection prevalence, coupled with high densities of An. melas and Mansonia vector species that have low or no teeth and exhibiting limitation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40249-019-0520-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6362603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63626032019-02-14 Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors Pi-Bansa, Sellase Osei, Joseph Harold Nyarko Frempong, Kwadwo Kyeremeh Elhassan, Elizabeth Akuoko, Osei Kweku Agyemang, David Ahorlu, Collins Appawu, Maxwell Alexander Koudou, Benjamin Guibehi Wilson, Michael David de Souza, Dziedzom Komi Dadzie, Samuel Kweku Utzinger, Jürg Boakye, Daniel Adjei Infect Dis Poverty Research Article BACKGROUND: Mass drug administration (MDA) programmes for the control of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana, have been ongoing in some endemic districts for 16 years. The current study aimed to assess factors that govern the success of MDA programmes for breaking transmission of lymphatic filariasis in Ghana. METHODS: The study was undertaken in two “hotspot” districts (Ahanta West and Kassena Nankana West) and two control districts (Mpohor and Bongo) in Ghana. Mosquitoes were collected and identified using morphological and molecular tools. A proportion of the cibarial armatures of each species was examined. Dissections were performed on Anopheles gambiae for filarial worm detection. A questionnaire was administered to obtain information on MDA compliance and vector control activities. Data were compared between districts to determine factors that might explain persistent transmission of lymphatic filariasis. RESULTS: High numbers of mosquitoes were sampled in Ahanta West district compared to Mpohor district (F = 16.09, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference between the numbers of mosquitoes collected in Kassena Nankana West and Bongo districts (F = 2.16, P = 0.185). Mansonia species were predominant in Ahanta West district. An. coluzzii mosquitoes were prevalent in all districts. An. melas with infected and infective filarial worms was found only in Ahanta West district. No differences were found in cibarial teeth numbers and shape for mosquito species in the surveyed districts. Reported MDA coverage was high in all districts. The average use of bednet and indoor residual spraying was 82.4 and 66.2%, respectively. There was high compliance in the five preceding MDA rounds in Ahanta West and Kassena Nankana West districts, both considered hotspots of lymphatic filariasis transmission. CONCLUSIONS: The study on persistent transmission of lymphatic filariasis in the two areas in Ghana present information that shows the importance of local understanding of factors affecting control and elimination of lymphatic filariasis. Unlike Kassena Nankana West district where transmission dynamics could be explained by initial infection prevalence and low vector densities, ongoing lymphatic filariasis transmission in Ahanta West district might be explained by high biting rates of An. gambiae and initial infection prevalence, coupled with high densities of An. melas and Mansonia vector species that have low or no teeth and exhibiting limitation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40249-019-0520-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6362603/ /pubmed/30717788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0520-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pi-Bansa, Sellase
Osei, Joseph Harold Nyarko
Frempong, Kwadwo Kyeremeh
Elhassan, Elizabeth
Akuoko, Osei Kweku
Agyemang, David
Ahorlu, Collins
Appawu, Maxwell Alexander
Koudou, Benjamin Guibehi
Wilson, Michael David
de Souza, Dziedzom Komi
Dadzie, Samuel Kweku
Utzinger, Jürg
Boakye, Daniel Adjei
Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors
title Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors
title_full Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors
title_fullStr Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors
title_full_unstemmed Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors
title_short Potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in Ghana: the importance of vectors
title_sort potential factors influencing lymphatic filariasis transmission in “hotspot” and “control” areas in ghana: the importance of vectors
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6362603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30717788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40249-019-0520-1
work_keys_str_mv AT pibansasellase potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT oseijosephharoldnyarko potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT frempongkwadwokyeremeh potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT elhassanelizabeth potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT akuokooseikweku potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT agyemangdavid potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT ahorlucollins potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT appawumaxwellalexander potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT koudoubenjaminguibehi potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT wilsonmichaeldavid potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT desouzadziedzomkomi potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT dadziesamuelkweku potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT utzingerjurg potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors
AT boakyedanieladjei potentialfactorsinfluencinglymphaticfilariasistransmissioninhotspotandcontrolareasinghanatheimportanceofvectors