Cargando…
Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor
BACKGROUND: Sugar beet is a highly salt-tolerant crop. However, its ability to withstand high salinity is reduced compared to sea beet, a wild ancestor of all beet crops. The aim of this study was to investigate transcriptional patterns associated with physiological, cytological and biochemical mech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30727960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1661-x |
_version_ | 1783393278942511104 |
---|---|
author | Skorupa, Monika Gołębiewski, Marcin Kurnik, Katarzyna Niedojadło, Janusz Kęsy, Jacek Klamkowski, Krzysztof Wójcik, Katarzyna Treder, Waldemar Tretyn, Andrzej Tyburski, Jarosław |
author_facet | Skorupa, Monika Gołębiewski, Marcin Kurnik, Katarzyna Niedojadło, Janusz Kęsy, Jacek Klamkowski, Krzysztof Wójcik, Katarzyna Treder, Waldemar Tretyn, Andrzej Tyburski, Jarosław |
author_sort | Skorupa, Monika |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sugar beet is a highly salt-tolerant crop. However, its ability to withstand high salinity is reduced compared to sea beet, a wild ancestor of all beet crops. The aim of this study was to investigate transcriptional patterns associated with physiological, cytological and biochemical mechanisms involved in salt response in these closely related subspecies. Salt acclimation strategies were assessed in plants subjected to either gradually increasing salt levels (salt-stress) or in excised leaves, exposed instantly to salinity (salt-shock). RESULT: The majority of DEGs was down-regulated under stress, which may lead to certain aspects of metabolism being reduced in this treatment, as exemplified by lowered transpiration and photosynthesis. This effect was more pronounced in sugar beet. Additionally, sugar beet, but not sea beet, growth was restricted. Silencing of genes encoding numerous transcription factors and signaling proteins was observed, concomitantly with the up-regulation of lipid transfer protein-encoding genes and those coding for NRTs. Bark storage protein genes were up-regulated in sugar beet to the level observed in unstressed sea beet. Osmotic adjustment, manifested by increased water and proline content, occurred in salt-shocked leaves of both genotypes, due to the concerted activation of genes encoding aquaporins, ion channels and osmoprotectants synthesizing enzymes. bHLH137 was the only TF-encoding gene induced by salt in a dose-dependent manner irrespective of the mode of salt treatment. Moreover, the incidence of bHLH-binding motives in promoter regions of salinity-regulated genes was significantly greater than in non-regulated ones. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining homeostasis under salt stress requires deeper transcriptomic changes in the sugar beet than in the sea beet. In both genotypes salt shock elicits greater transcriptomic changes than stress and it results in greater number of up-regulated genes compared to the latter. NRTs and bark storage protein may play a yet undefined role in salt stress-acclimation in beet. bHLH is a putative regulator of salt response in beet leaves and a promising candidate for further studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1661-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6364445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63644452019-02-15 Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor Skorupa, Monika Gołębiewski, Marcin Kurnik, Katarzyna Niedojadło, Janusz Kęsy, Jacek Klamkowski, Krzysztof Wójcik, Katarzyna Treder, Waldemar Tretyn, Andrzej Tyburski, Jarosław BMC Plant Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Sugar beet is a highly salt-tolerant crop. However, its ability to withstand high salinity is reduced compared to sea beet, a wild ancestor of all beet crops. The aim of this study was to investigate transcriptional patterns associated with physiological, cytological and biochemical mechanisms involved in salt response in these closely related subspecies. Salt acclimation strategies were assessed in plants subjected to either gradually increasing salt levels (salt-stress) or in excised leaves, exposed instantly to salinity (salt-shock). RESULT: The majority of DEGs was down-regulated under stress, which may lead to certain aspects of metabolism being reduced in this treatment, as exemplified by lowered transpiration and photosynthesis. This effect was more pronounced in sugar beet. Additionally, sugar beet, but not sea beet, growth was restricted. Silencing of genes encoding numerous transcription factors and signaling proteins was observed, concomitantly with the up-regulation of lipid transfer protein-encoding genes and those coding for NRTs. Bark storage protein genes were up-regulated in sugar beet to the level observed in unstressed sea beet. Osmotic adjustment, manifested by increased water and proline content, occurred in salt-shocked leaves of both genotypes, due to the concerted activation of genes encoding aquaporins, ion channels and osmoprotectants synthesizing enzymes. bHLH137 was the only TF-encoding gene induced by salt in a dose-dependent manner irrespective of the mode of salt treatment. Moreover, the incidence of bHLH-binding motives in promoter regions of salinity-regulated genes was significantly greater than in non-regulated ones. CONCLUSIONS: Maintaining homeostasis under salt stress requires deeper transcriptomic changes in the sugar beet than in the sea beet. In both genotypes salt shock elicits greater transcriptomic changes than stress and it results in greater number of up-regulated genes compared to the latter. NRTs and bark storage protein may play a yet undefined role in salt stress-acclimation in beet. bHLH is a putative regulator of salt response in beet leaves and a promising candidate for further studies. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12870-019-1661-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6364445/ /pubmed/30727960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1661-x Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Skorupa, Monika Gołębiewski, Marcin Kurnik, Katarzyna Niedojadło, Janusz Kęsy, Jacek Klamkowski, Krzysztof Wójcik, Katarzyna Treder, Waldemar Tretyn, Andrzej Tyburski, Jarosław Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
title | Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
title_full | Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
title_fullStr | Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
title_full_unstemmed | Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
title_short | Salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
title_sort | salt stress vs. salt shock - the case of sugar beet and its halophytic ancestor |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30727960 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-019-1661-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT skorupamonika saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT gołebiewskimarcin saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT kurnikkatarzyna saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT niedojadłojanusz saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT kesyjacek saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT klamkowskikrzysztof saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT wojcikkatarzyna saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT trederwaldemar saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT tretynandrzej saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor AT tyburskijarosław saltstressvssaltshockthecaseofsugarbeetanditshalophyticancestor |