Cargando…

Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection

OBJECTIVE: Identification of otomycotic fungi using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) time of flight (TOF) mass spectroscopy (MS) and to quantify pervasive errors with Bayes rule; values of sensitivity and specificity of culture test and MALDI-TOF-MS method are quantified. METHOD:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rath, Sibanarayan, Das, Saumya Ranjan, Padhy, Rabindra Nath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: KeAi Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.03.006
_version_ 1783393298724945920
author Rath, Sibanarayan
Das, Saumya Ranjan
Padhy, Rabindra Nath
author_facet Rath, Sibanarayan
Das, Saumya Ranjan
Padhy, Rabindra Nath
author_sort Rath, Sibanarayan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Identification of otomycotic fungi using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) time of flight (TOF) mass spectroscopy (MS) and to quantify pervasive errors with Bayes rule; values of sensitivity and specificity of culture test and MALDI-TOF-MS method are quantified. METHOD: Fungi cultured ear discharge samples were identified with culture test and MALDI-TOF-MS system. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or MEC (minimum effective concentration) for 6 antifungals were determined by antifungal susceptibility testing in vitro. With Bayes rule, sensitivity and specificity of both MALDI-TOF MS and culture test methods were computed. RESULTS: Cultures yielded 42 fungal isolates which were confirmed as species (specified against each species) belonging to 8 genera, A. niger 22, Candida sp. 7, A. fumigatus 3, A. flavus 3, mixed Aspergillus sp. 3, Mucor sp. 2, Rhizopus sp. 1, and Scopulariopsis sp.1; and MALDI-TOF-MS system also confirmed those isolates. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing with terms of MIC 50 and MIC 90, isolates fungi were highly susceptible to 6 antifungals; and caspofungin was the most active antifungal. The high value of specificity 84.6%, suggested a limited loss of confidence on the culture test at the absence of an infection, in comparison to MALDI-TOF-MS. Sensitivity of the culture test was 87.5%; this high figure strongly approves the culture test to be the dependable method for the otomycosis diagnosis, when the infection is stable. CONCLUSION: Based on sensitivity and specificity together the culture test could be done in face of the gold-standard MALDI-TOF-MS system the estimating both methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6364575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher KeAi Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63645752019-02-15 Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection Rath, Sibanarayan Das, Saumya Ranjan Padhy, Rabindra Nath World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg Research Paper OBJECTIVE: Identification of otomycotic fungi using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) time of flight (TOF) mass spectroscopy (MS) and to quantify pervasive errors with Bayes rule; values of sensitivity and specificity of culture test and MALDI-TOF-MS method are quantified. METHOD: Fungi cultured ear discharge samples were identified with culture test and MALDI-TOF-MS system. Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) or MEC (minimum effective concentration) for 6 antifungals were determined by antifungal susceptibility testing in vitro. With Bayes rule, sensitivity and specificity of both MALDI-TOF MS and culture test methods were computed. RESULTS: Cultures yielded 42 fungal isolates which were confirmed as species (specified against each species) belonging to 8 genera, A. niger 22, Candida sp. 7, A. fumigatus 3, A. flavus 3, mixed Aspergillus sp. 3, Mucor sp. 2, Rhizopus sp. 1, and Scopulariopsis sp.1; and MALDI-TOF-MS system also confirmed those isolates. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing with terms of MIC 50 and MIC 90, isolates fungi were highly susceptible to 6 antifungals; and caspofungin was the most active antifungal. The high value of specificity 84.6%, suggested a limited loss of confidence on the culture test at the absence of an infection, in comparison to MALDI-TOF-MS. Sensitivity of the culture test was 87.5%; this high figure strongly approves the culture test to be the dependable method for the otomycosis diagnosis, when the infection is stable. CONCLUSION: Based on sensitivity and specificity together the culture test could be done in face of the gold-standard MALDI-TOF-MS system the estimating both methods. KeAi Publishing 2019-01-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6364575/ /pubmed/30775695 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.03.006 Text en © 2018 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Paper
Rath, Sibanarayan
Das, Saumya Ranjan
Padhy, Rabindra Nath
Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection
title Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection
title_full Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection
title_fullStr Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection
title_short Bayesian analysis of two methods MALDI-TOF-MS system and culture test in otomycosis infection
title_sort bayesian analysis of two methods maldi-tof-ms system and culture test in otomycosis infection
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775695
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wjorl.2018.03.006
work_keys_str_mv AT rathsibanarayan bayesiananalysisoftwomethodsmalditofmssystemandculturetestinotomycosisinfection
AT dassaumyaranjan bayesiananalysisoftwomethodsmalditofmssystemandculturetestinotomycosisinfection
AT padhyrabindranath bayesiananalysisoftwomethodsmalditofmssystemandculturetestinotomycosisinfection