Cargando…
Evidence that nonsignificant results are sometimes preferred: Reverse P-hacking or selective reporting?
There is increased concern about poor scientific practices arising from an excessive focus on P-values. Two particularly worrisome practices are selective reporting of significant results and ‘P-hacking’. The latter is the manipulation of data collection, usage, or analyses to obtain statistically s...
Autores principales: | Chuard, Pierre J. C., Vrtílek, Milan, Head, Megan L., Jennions, Michael D. |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6364929/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30682013 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000127 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The Extent and Consequences of P-Hacking in Science
por: Head, Megan L., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Application of the Reverse Fragility Index to Statistically Nonsignificant Randomized Clinical Trial Results
por: Khan, Muhammad Shahzeb, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evidence of Experimental Bias in the Life Sciences: Why We Need Blind Data Recording
por: Holman, Luke, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Nonsignificant P values cannot prove null hypothesis: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence
por: Jaykaran,, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Sometimes you’re the scooper, and sometimes you get scooped: How to turn both into something good
por: Kim, Jin-Soo, et al.
Publicado: (2018)