Cargando…

Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy are not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy with circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy. DESIGN: This was a parallel gr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lin, Hong-Cheng, He, Qiu-Lan, Shao, Wan-Jin, Chen, Xin-Lin, Peng, Hui, Xie, Shang-Kui, Wang, Xiao-Xue, Ren, Dong-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30489326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001261
_version_ 1783393386052452352
author Lin, Hong-Cheng
He, Qiu-Lan
Shao, Wan-Jin
Chen, Xin-Lin
Peng, Hui
Xie, Shang-Kui
Wang, Xiao-Xue
Ren, Dong-Lin
author_facet Lin, Hong-Cheng
He, Qiu-Lan
Shao, Wan-Jin
Chen, Xin-Lin
Peng, Hui
Xie, Shang-Kui
Wang, Xiao-Xue
Ren, Dong-Lin
author_sort Lin, Hong-Cheng
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy are not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy with circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy. DESIGN: This was a parallel group, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic center. PATIENTS: Patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids between August 2011 and November 2013 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Three hundred patients were randomly assigned to undergo either partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group 1, n = 150) or circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group 2, n = 150). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of recurrent prolapse at a median follow-up period of 5 years with a predefined noninferiority margin of 3.75%. Secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of postoperative pain, fecal urgency, anal continence, and the frequency of specific complications, including anorectal stenosis and rectovaginal fistula. RESULTS: The visual analog scores in group 1 were less than those in group 2 (p < 0.001). Fewer patients in group 1 experienced postoperative urgency compared with those in group 2 (p = 0.001). Anal continence significantly worsened after both procedures, but the difference between preoperative and postoperative continence scores was higher for group 2 than for group 1. Postoperative rectal stenosis did not develop in patients in group 1, although it occurred in 8 patients (5%) in group 2 (p = 0.004). The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate between group 1 (9% (95% CI, 4%–13%)) and group 2 (12% (95% CI, 7%–17%)) did not differ significantly (p = 0.137), and the difference was within the noninferiority margin (absolute difference, –3.33% (95% CI, –10.00% to 3.55%)). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited because it was a single-center trial. CONCLUSIONS: Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy is noninferior to circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy for patients with grade III to IV hemorrhoids at a median follow-up period of 5 years. However, partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy was associated with reduced postoperative pain and urgency, better postoperative anal continence, and minimal risk of rectal stenosis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A790. Trial registration (chictr.org) identifier is chiCTR-trc-11001506.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6365260
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Lippincott
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63652602019-02-20 Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial Lin, Hong-Cheng He, Qiu-Lan Shao, Wan-Jin Chen, Xin-Lin Peng, Hui Xie, Shang-Kui Wang, Xiao-Xue Ren, Dong-Lin Dis Colon Rectum Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy are not known. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term clinical efficacy and safety of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy with circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy. DESIGN: This was a parallel group, randomized, noninferiority clinical trial. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a single academic center. PATIENTS: Patients with grade III/IV hemorrhoids between August 2011 and November 2013 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Three hundred patients were randomly assigned to undergo either partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group 1, n = 150) or circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy (group 2, n = 150). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of recurrent prolapse at a median follow-up period of 5 years with a predefined noninferiority margin of 3.75%. Secondary outcomes included incidence and severity of postoperative pain, fecal urgency, anal continence, and the frequency of specific complications, including anorectal stenosis and rectovaginal fistula. RESULTS: The visual analog scores in group 1 were less than those in group 2 (p < 0.001). Fewer patients in group 1 experienced postoperative urgency compared with those in group 2 (p = 0.001). Anal continence significantly worsened after both procedures, but the difference between preoperative and postoperative continence scores was higher for group 2 than for group 1. Postoperative rectal stenosis did not develop in patients in group 1, although it occurred in 8 patients (5%) in group 2 (p = 0.004). The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate between group 1 (9% (95% CI, 4%–13%)) and group 2 (12% (95% CI, 7%–17%)) did not differ significantly (p = 0.137), and the difference was within the noninferiority margin (absolute difference, –3.33% (95% CI, –10.00% to 3.55%)). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited because it was a single-center trial. CONCLUSIONS: Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy is noninferior to circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy for patients with grade III to IV hemorrhoids at a median follow-up period of 5 years. However, partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy was associated with reduced postoperative pain and urgency, better postoperative anal continence, and minimal risk of rectal stenosis. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A790. Trial registration (chictr.org) identifier is chiCTR-trc-11001506. Lippincott 2019-02 2018-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC6365260/ /pubmed/30489326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001261 Text en Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Lin, Hong-Cheng
He, Qiu-Lan
Shao, Wan-Jin
Chen, Xin-Lin
Peng, Hui
Xie, Shang-Kui
Wang, Xiao-Xue
Ren, Dong-Lin
Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_full Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_fullStr Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_full_unstemmed Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_short Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
title_sort partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circumferential stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade iii to iv prolapsing hemorrhoids: a randomized, noninferiority trial
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365260/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30489326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DCR.0000000000001261
work_keys_str_mv AT linhongcheng partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT heqiulan partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT shaowanjin partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT chenxinlin partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT penghui partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT xieshangkui partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT wangxiaoxue partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial
AT rendonglin partialstapledhemorrhoidopexyversuscircumferentialstapledhemorrhoidopexyforgradeiiitoivprolapsinghemorrhoidsarandomizednoninferioritytrial