Cargando…

A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg

A randomized, multicenter, open-label study explored the effect of a fixed-dose (FD) of plerixafor versus the approved weight-based (WB) dose for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and a body weight of ≤70 kg. After mobilization with granulocy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuruvilla, John, Tzeng, Cheng-Hwai, Cho, Seok-Goo, Kim, Seok Jin, Tang, Jih-Luh, Su, Yaming, Wu, Jingyang, Vargo, Rita, Cheverton, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0253-y
_version_ 1783393400823742464
author Kuruvilla, John
Tzeng, Cheng-Hwai
Cho, Seok-Goo
Kim, Seok Jin
Tang, Jih-Luh
Su, Yaming
Wu, Jingyang
Vargo, Rita
Cheverton, Peter
author_facet Kuruvilla, John
Tzeng, Cheng-Hwai
Cho, Seok-Goo
Kim, Seok Jin
Tang, Jih-Luh
Su, Yaming
Wu, Jingyang
Vargo, Rita
Cheverton, Peter
author_sort Kuruvilla, John
collection PubMed
description A randomized, multicenter, open-label study explored the effect of a fixed-dose (FD) of plerixafor versus the approved weight-based (WB) dose for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and a body weight of ≤70 kg. After mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days, patients were randomized 1:1 to either plerixafor FD 20 mg (n = 30) or WB 0.24 mg/kg (n = 31) on the evening of Day 4. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in ≤4 days of apheresis, and total systemic exposure to plerixafor (area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 10 h [AUC(0–10)]). There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients attaining the primary efficacy endpoint (60% FD arm, 55% WB arm; P = 0.395). Exposure to plerixafor was greater in the FD arm relative to the WB arm; however, there was no appreciable difference regarding fold increases of peripheral blood CD34(+) cells. The safety profile was similar between treatment groups. These results suggest there is no statistically significant difference in HSC mobilization with a standard WB dosing regimen of plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with low body weight compared with an FD regimen.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6365372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63653722019-02-08 A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg Kuruvilla, John Tzeng, Cheng-Hwai Cho, Seok-Goo Kim, Seok Jin Tang, Jih-Luh Su, Yaming Wu, Jingyang Vargo, Rita Cheverton, Peter Bone Marrow Transplant Article A randomized, multicenter, open-label study explored the effect of a fixed-dose (FD) of plerixafor versus the approved weight-based (WB) dose for the mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and a body weight of ≤70 kg. After mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 μg/kg/day for 4 days, patients were randomized 1:1 to either plerixafor FD 20 mg (n = 30) or WB 0.24 mg/kg (n = 31) on the evening of Day 4. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving ≥5 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in ≤4 days of apheresis, and total systemic exposure to plerixafor (area under the concentration–time curve from 0 to 10 h [AUC(0–10)]). There was no statistically significant difference between the proportion of patients attaining the primary efficacy endpoint (60% FD arm, 55% WB arm; P = 0.395). Exposure to plerixafor was greater in the FD arm relative to the WB arm; however, there was no appreciable difference regarding fold increases of peripheral blood CD34(+) cells. The safety profile was similar between treatment groups. These results suggest there is no statistically significant difference in HSC mobilization with a standard WB dosing regimen of plerixafor plus G-CSF in patients with low body weight compared with an FD regimen. Nature Publishing Group UK 2018-06-12 2019 /pmc/articles/PMC6365372/ /pubmed/29895931 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0253-y Text en © The Author(s) 2018 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Kuruvilla, John
Tzeng, Cheng-Hwai
Cho, Seok-Goo
Kim, Seok Jin
Tang, Jih-Luh
Su, Yaming
Wu, Jingyang
Vargo, Rita
Cheverton, Peter
A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
title A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
title_full A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
title_fullStr A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
title_full_unstemmed A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
title_short A phase IV, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with G-CSF in patients with Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
title_sort phase iv, randomized, multicenter, open-label trial comparing efficacy and systemic exposure for a standard weight-based dose versus a fixed dose of plerixafor in combination with g-csf in patients with non-hodgkin’s lymphoma weighing ≤70 kg
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29895931
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41409-018-0253-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kuruvillajohn aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT tzengchenghwai aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT choseokgoo aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT kimseokjin aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT tangjihluh aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT suyaming aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT wujingyang aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT vargorita aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT chevertonpeter aphaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT kuruvillajohn phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT tzengchenghwai phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT choseokgoo phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT kimseokjin phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT tangjihluh phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT suyaming phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT wujingyang phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT vargorita phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg
AT chevertonpeter phaseivrandomizedmulticenteropenlabeltrialcomparingefficacyandsystemicexposureforastandardweightbaseddoseversusafixeddoseofplerixaforincombinationwithgcsfinpatientswithnonhodgkinslymphomaweighing70kg