Cargando…
From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
Our current knowledge of the structure, function, and diseases of the brain comes from direct examination of its substance. In the last centuries, only a few elite had managed to retrieve, gather, and preserve the elusive brain for their own research. The resulting brain collections, stored in forma...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002 |
_version_ | 1783393404459155456 |
---|---|
author | Carlos, Arenn Faye Poloni, Tino Emanuele Medici, Valentina Chikhladze, Maia Guaita, Antonio Ceroni, Mauro |
author_facet | Carlos, Arenn Faye Poloni, Tino Emanuele Medici, Valentina Chikhladze, Maia Guaita, Antonio Ceroni, Mauro |
author_sort | Carlos, Arenn Faye |
collection | PubMed |
description | Our current knowledge of the structure, function, and diseases of the brain comes from direct examination of its substance. In the last centuries, only a few elite had managed to retrieve, gather, and preserve the elusive brain for their own research. The resulting brain collections, stored in formalin-filled jars or dried up in cabinets, served anatomical, neuropathological, anthropometric, ideological, and diagnostic purposes. In the 1960s, the first modern brain banks actively collecting and strategically preserving both diseased and healthy brains to be consequently distributed to the scientific community were instituted. In an era where state-of-the-art biochemical “Omic” studies and advanced metabolic and molecular neuroimaging exist, it is now, more than ever, that postmortem brain investigations must be performed. Only through the comparison and integration of postmortem neuropathological and biochemical findings and antemortem data from clinical, neuropsychological neuroimaging, and other biomarker examinations can we truly understand neurological disease mechanisms. Brain banks supplying brain specimens, antemortem information, and postmortem diagnosis are a major benefactor of brain research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6365388 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63653882019-02-15 From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective Carlos, Arenn Faye Poloni, Tino Emanuele Medici, Valentina Chikhladze, Maia Guaita, Antonio Ceroni, Mauro Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Policy Forum Our current knowledge of the structure, function, and diseases of the brain comes from direct examination of its substance. In the last centuries, only a few elite had managed to retrieve, gather, and preserve the elusive brain for their own research. The resulting brain collections, stored in formalin-filled jars or dried up in cabinets, served anatomical, neuropathological, anthropometric, ideological, and diagnostic purposes. In the 1960s, the first modern brain banks actively collecting and strategically preserving both diseased and healthy brains to be consequently distributed to the scientific community were instituted. In an era where state-of-the-art biochemical “Omic” studies and advanced metabolic and molecular neuroimaging exist, it is now, more than ever, that postmortem brain investigations must be performed. Only through the comparison and integration of postmortem neuropathological and biochemical findings and antemortem data from clinical, neuropsychological neuroimaging, and other biomarker examinations can we truly understand neurological disease mechanisms. Brain banks supplying brain specimens, antemortem information, and postmortem diagnosis are a major benefactor of brain research. Elsevier 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6365388/ /pubmed/30775417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Policy Forum Carlos, Arenn Faye Poloni, Tino Emanuele Medici, Valentina Chikhladze, Maia Guaita, Antonio Ceroni, Mauro From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective |
title | From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective |
title_full | From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective |
title_fullStr | From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective |
title_full_unstemmed | From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective |
title_short | From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective |
title_sort | from brain collections to modern brain banks: a historical perspective |
topic | Policy Forum |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365388/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carlosarennfaye frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective AT polonitinoemanuele frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective AT medicivalentina frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective AT chikhladzemaia frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective AT guaitaantonio frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective AT ceronimauro frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective |