Cargando…

From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective

Our current knowledge of the structure, function, and diseases of the brain comes from direct examination of its substance. In the last centuries, only a few elite had managed to retrieve, gather, and preserve the elusive brain for their own research. The resulting brain collections, stored in forma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlos, Arenn Faye, Poloni, Tino Emanuele, Medici, Valentina, Chikhladze, Maia, Guaita, Antonio, Ceroni, Mauro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002
_version_ 1783393404459155456
author Carlos, Arenn Faye
Poloni, Tino Emanuele
Medici, Valentina
Chikhladze, Maia
Guaita, Antonio
Ceroni, Mauro
author_facet Carlos, Arenn Faye
Poloni, Tino Emanuele
Medici, Valentina
Chikhladze, Maia
Guaita, Antonio
Ceroni, Mauro
author_sort Carlos, Arenn Faye
collection PubMed
description Our current knowledge of the structure, function, and diseases of the brain comes from direct examination of its substance. In the last centuries, only a few elite had managed to retrieve, gather, and preserve the elusive brain for their own research. The resulting brain collections, stored in formalin-filled jars or dried up in cabinets, served anatomical, neuropathological, anthropometric, ideological, and diagnostic purposes. In the 1960s, the first modern brain banks actively collecting and strategically preserving both diseased and healthy brains to be consequently distributed to the scientific community were instituted. In an era where state-of-the-art biochemical “Omic” studies and advanced metabolic and molecular neuroimaging exist, it is now, more than ever, that postmortem brain investigations must be performed. Only through the comparison and integration of postmortem neuropathological and biochemical findings and antemortem data from clinical, neuropsychological neuroimaging, and other biomarker examinations can we truly understand neurological disease mechanisms. Brain banks supplying brain specimens, antemortem information, and postmortem diagnosis are a major benefactor of brain research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6365388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63653882019-02-15 From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective Carlos, Arenn Faye Poloni, Tino Emanuele Medici, Valentina Chikhladze, Maia Guaita, Antonio Ceroni, Mauro Alzheimers Dement (N Y) Policy Forum Our current knowledge of the structure, function, and diseases of the brain comes from direct examination of its substance. In the last centuries, only a few elite had managed to retrieve, gather, and preserve the elusive brain for their own research. The resulting brain collections, stored in formalin-filled jars or dried up in cabinets, served anatomical, neuropathological, anthropometric, ideological, and diagnostic purposes. In the 1960s, the first modern brain banks actively collecting and strategically preserving both diseased and healthy brains to be consequently distributed to the scientific community were instituted. In an era where state-of-the-art biochemical “Omic” studies and advanced metabolic and molecular neuroimaging exist, it is now, more than ever, that postmortem brain investigations must be performed. Only through the comparison and integration of postmortem neuropathological and biochemical findings and antemortem data from clinical, neuropsychological neuroimaging, and other biomarker examinations can we truly understand neurological disease mechanisms. Brain banks supplying brain specimens, antemortem information, and postmortem diagnosis are a major benefactor of brain research. Elsevier 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6365388/ /pubmed/30775417 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002 Text en © 2019 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Policy Forum
Carlos, Arenn Faye
Poloni, Tino Emanuele
Medici, Valentina
Chikhladze, Maia
Guaita, Antonio
Ceroni, Mauro
From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
title From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
title_full From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
title_fullStr From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
title_full_unstemmed From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
title_short From brain collections to modern brain banks: A historical perspective
title_sort from brain collections to modern brain banks: a historical perspective
topic Policy Forum
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30775417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trci.2018.12.002
work_keys_str_mv AT carlosarennfaye frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective
AT polonitinoemanuele frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective
AT medicivalentina frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective
AT chikhladzemaia frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective
AT guaitaantonio frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective
AT ceronimauro frombraincollectionstomodernbrainbanksahistoricalperspective