Cargando…
Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review
Background: Depression is a common mental disorder worldwide. Psychological treatments and antidepressant medication are the usual treatments for depression. However, a large proportion of patients with depression do not respond to the treatments. In 2005, Vagus nerve stimulation was approved for th...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00064 |
_version_ | 1783393416664580096 |
---|---|
author | Lv, Hang Zhao, Yan-hua Chen, Jian-guo Wang, Dong-yan Chen, Hao |
author_facet | Lv, Hang Zhao, Yan-hua Chen, Jian-guo Wang, Dong-yan Chen, Hao |
author_sort | Lv, Hang |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Depression is a common mental disorder worldwide. Psychological treatments and antidepressant medication are the usual treatments for depression. However, a large proportion of patients with depression do not respond to the treatments. In 2005, Vagus nerve stimulation was approved for the adjunctive long-term treatment of chronic or recurrent depression in adult patients experiencing a major depressive episode who had failed to respond to four or more adequate antidepressant treatments. However, the efficacy of VNS for treating depression remains unclear. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VNS. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Systematic search was performed in the database of Pubmed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of science for identifying the suitable trials. Suicidal rate was considered as the primary outcome in this review. Result: Only two randomized sham controlled add-on studies including 255 cases (134 with VNS treatment and 121 control cases) were included in this review. None of the studies reported suicidal rate. We performed a qualitative analysis and it is suggested that there was no significant statistic difference between VNS and sham VNS on the score of 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD(24)) (MD: −2.40, 95% CI: −7.90 to 3.10). Similar findings were also reported on improvement percentage of HAMD(24) (MD: 1.00, 95%CI: −6.06 to 8.06), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (MD: 4.70, 95%CI: −2.98 to 12.38) and 30 item Inventory of Depressive Symptomalogy-Self-Report (IDS-SR(30)) (MD: 4.9, 95%CI: −1.89 to 11.69). However, a marginal difference of Beck Depression Inventory self-rating score was detected between the real and sham treatment (MD: 7.80, 95% CI: 0.34 to 15.26). Aminor effect of IDS-SR(30)was also found in real VNS group (RR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.10). Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of VNS for depression is still unclear. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of VNS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6365437 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63654372019-02-14 Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review Lv, Hang Zhao, Yan-hua Chen, Jian-guo Wang, Dong-yan Chen, Hao Front Psychol Psychology Background: Depression is a common mental disorder worldwide. Psychological treatments and antidepressant medication are the usual treatments for depression. However, a large proportion of patients with depression do not respond to the treatments. In 2005, Vagus nerve stimulation was approved for the adjunctive long-term treatment of chronic or recurrent depression in adult patients experiencing a major depressive episode who had failed to respond to four or more adequate antidepressant treatments. However, the efficacy of VNS for treating depression remains unclear. Accordingly, we performed a systematic review to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VNS. Methods: We conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Systematic search was performed in the database of Pubmed, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of science for identifying the suitable trials. Suicidal rate was considered as the primary outcome in this review. Result: Only two randomized sham controlled add-on studies including 255 cases (134 with VNS treatment and 121 control cases) were included in this review. None of the studies reported suicidal rate. We performed a qualitative analysis and it is suggested that there was no significant statistic difference between VNS and sham VNS on the score of 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD(24)) (MD: −2.40, 95% CI: −7.90 to 3.10). Similar findings were also reported on improvement percentage of HAMD(24) (MD: 1.00, 95%CI: −6.06 to 8.06), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (MD: 4.70, 95%CI: −2.98 to 12.38) and 30 item Inventory of Depressive Symptomalogy-Self-Report (IDS-SR(30)) (MD: 4.9, 95%CI: −1.89 to 11.69). However, a marginal difference of Beck Depression Inventory self-rating score was detected between the real and sham treatment (MD: 7.80, 95% CI: 0.34 to 15.26). Aminor effect of IDS-SR(30)was also found in real VNS group (RR: 2.33, 95% CI: 1.07 to 5.10). Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of VNS for depression is still unclear. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the efficacy and safety of VNS. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6365437/ /pubmed/30766497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00064 Text en Copyright © 2019 Lv, Zhao, Chen, Wang and Chen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Lv, Hang Zhao, Yan-hua Chen, Jian-guo Wang, Dong-yan Chen, Hao Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review |
title | Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Depression: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | vagus nerve stimulation for depression: a systematic review |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766497 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00064 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lvhang vagusnervestimulationfordepressionasystematicreview AT zhaoyanhua vagusnervestimulationfordepressionasystematicreview AT chenjianguo vagusnervestimulationfordepressionasystematicreview AT wangdongyan vagusnervestimulationfordepressionasystematicreview AT chenhao vagusnervestimulationfordepressionasystematicreview |