Cargando…

Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls

Background: Non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCI) represent an emerging technology for enabling persons with impaired or lost grasping and reaching functions due to high spinal cord injury (SCI) to control assistive devices. A major drawback of BCIs is a high rate of false classifications. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keyl, Philipp, Schneiders, Matthias, Schuld, Christian, Franz, Steffen, Hommelsen, Maximilian, Weidner, Nobert, Rupp, Rüdiger
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01192
_version_ 1783393418538385408
author Keyl, Philipp
Schneiders, Matthias
Schuld, Christian
Franz, Steffen
Hommelsen, Maximilian
Weidner, Nobert
Rupp, Rüdiger
author_facet Keyl, Philipp
Schneiders, Matthias
Schuld, Christian
Franz, Steffen
Hommelsen, Maximilian
Weidner, Nobert
Rupp, Rüdiger
author_sort Keyl, Philipp
collection PubMed
description Background: Non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCI) represent an emerging technology for enabling persons with impaired or lost grasping and reaching functions due to high spinal cord injury (SCI) to control assistive devices. A major drawback of BCIs is a high rate of false classifications. The robustness and performance of BCIs might be improved using cerebral electrophysiological correlates of error recognition (error-related potentials, ErrPs). As ErrPs have never been systematically examined in subjects with SCI, this study compares the characteristics of ErrPs in individuals with SCI with those of able-bodied control subjects. Methods: ErrPs at FCz and Cz were analyzed in 11 subjects with SCI (9 male, median age 28 y) and in 11 sex- and age-matched controls. Moving a shoulder joystick according to a visual cue, subjects received feedback about the match/mismatch of the performed movement. ErrPs occurring after “error”-feedback were evaluated by comparing means of voltage values within three consecutive time windows after feedback (wP1, wN1, wP2 containing peak voltages P1, N1, P2) using repeated-measurement analysis of variance. Results: In the control group, mean voltage values for the “error” and “correct” feedback condition differed significantly around N1 (FCz: 254 ms, Cz: 252 ms) and P2 (FCz: 347 ms, Cz: 345 ms), but not around P1 (FCz: 181 ms, Cz: 179 ms). ErrPs of the control and the SCI group showed similar morphology, however mean amplitudes of ErrPs were significantly smaller in individuals with SCI compared to controls for wN1 (FCz: control = −1.55 μV, SCI = −0.27 μV, p = 0.02; Cz: control = −1.03 μV, SCI = 0.11 μV, p = 0.04) and wP2 (FCz: control = 2.79 μV, SCI = 1.29 μV, p = 0.011; Cz: control = 2.12 μV, SCI = 0.81 μV, p = 0.003). Mean voltage values in wP1, wN1, and wP2 did not correlate significantly with either chronicity after or level of injury. Conclusion: The morphology of ErrPs in subjects with and without SCI is comparable, however, with reduced mean amplitude in wN1 and wP2 in the SCI group. Further studies should evaluate whether ErrP-classification can be used for online correction of false BCI-commands in individuals with SCI.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6365444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63654442019-02-14 Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls Keyl, Philipp Schneiders, Matthias Schuld, Christian Franz, Steffen Hommelsen, Maximilian Weidner, Nobert Rupp, Rüdiger Front Neurol Neurology Background: Non-invasive brain-computer interfaces (BCI) represent an emerging technology for enabling persons with impaired or lost grasping and reaching functions due to high spinal cord injury (SCI) to control assistive devices. A major drawback of BCIs is a high rate of false classifications. The robustness and performance of BCIs might be improved using cerebral electrophysiological correlates of error recognition (error-related potentials, ErrPs). As ErrPs have never been systematically examined in subjects with SCI, this study compares the characteristics of ErrPs in individuals with SCI with those of able-bodied control subjects. Methods: ErrPs at FCz and Cz were analyzed in 11 subjects with SCI (9 male, median age 28 y) and in 11 sex- and age-matched controls. Moving a shoulder joystick according to a visual cue, subjects received feedback about the match/mismatch of the performed movement. ErrPs occurring after “error”-feedback were evaluated by comparing means of voltage values within three consecutive time windows after feedback (wP1, wN1, wP2 containing peak voltages P1, N1, P2) using repeated-measurement analysis of variance. Results: In the control group, mean voltage values for the “error” and “correct” feedback condition differed significantly around N1 (FCz: 254 ms, Cz: 252 ms) and P2 (FCz: 347 ms, Cz: 345 ms), but not around P1 (FCz: 181 ms, Cz: 179 ms). ErrPs of the control and the SCI group showed similar morphology, however mean amplitudes of ErrPs were significantly smaller in individuals with SCI compared to controls for wN1 (FCz: control = −1.55 μV, SCI = −0.27 μV, p = 0.02; Cz: control = −1.03 μV, SCI = 0.11 μV, p = 0.04) and wP2 (FCz: control = 2.79 μV, SCI = 1.29 μV, p = 0.011; Cz: control = 2.12 μV, SCI = 0.81 μV, p = 0.003). Mean voltage values in wP1, wN1, and wP2 did not correlate significantly with either chronicity after or level of injury. Conclusion: The morphology of ErrPs in subjects with and without SCI is comparable, however, with reduced mean amplitude in wN1 and wP2 in the SCI group. Further studies should evaluate whether ErrP-classification can be used for online correction of false BCI-commands in individuals with SCI. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC6365444/ /pubmed/30766510 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01192 Text en Copyright © 2019 Keyl, Schneiders, Schuld, Franz, Hommelsen, Weidner and Rupp. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neurology
Keyl, Philipp
Schneiders, Matthias
Schuld, Christian
Franz, Steffen
Hommelsen, Maximilian
Weidner, Nobert
Rupp, Rüdiger
Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls
title Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls
title_full Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls
title_fullStr Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls
title_full_unstemmed Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls
title_short Differences in Characteristics of Error-Related Potentials Between Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury and Age- and Sex-Matched Able-Bodied Controls
title_sort differences in characteristics of error-related potentials between individuals with spinal cord injury and age- and sex-matched able-bodied controls
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30766510
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.01192
work_keys_str_mv AT keylphilipp differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols
AT schneidersmatthias differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols
AT schuldchristian differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols
AT franzsteffen differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols
AT hommelsenmaximilian differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols
AT weidnernobert differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols
AT rupprudiger differencesincharacteristicsoferrorrelatedpotentialsbetweenindividualswithspinalcordinjuryandageandsexmatchedablebodiedcontrols