Cargando…
The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis
BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterized by a complex immune response. This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical effectiveness of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IVIgGM) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Four databases, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30725235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0501-3 |
_version_ | 1783393454988984320 |
---|---|
author | Cui, Jie Wei, Xuxia Lv, Haijin Li, Yuntao Li, Ping Chen, Zhen Liu, Genglong |
author_facet | Cui, Jie Wei, Xuxia Lv, Haijin Li, Yuntao Li, Ping Chen, Zhen Liu, Genglong |
author_sort | Cui, Jie |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterized by a complex immune response. This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical effectiveness of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IVIgGM) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Four databases, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase, were systematically searched from inception to June 2018 to update the 2013 edition of the Cochrane review by two investigators, who independently selected studies, extracted relevant data, and evaluated study quality. Data were subjected to a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) for the primary and secondary outcomes. Level of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS: Nineteen studies comprising 1530 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that the use of IVIgGM reduced the mortality risk of septic patients (relative risk 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.69, I(2) = 0%). TSA showed that IVIgGM had a significant effect on mortality. Additionally, the meta-analysis suggested that use of IVIgGM shortened length of mechanical ventilation (mean difference − 3.16 days; 95% CI − 5.71 to − 0.61 days) and did not shorten length of stay in the intensive care unit (mean difference − 0.38 days; 95% CI − 3.55 to 2.80 days). The GRADE scale showed that the certainty of the body of evidence was low for both benefits and IVIgGM. CONCLUSION: Administration of IVIgGM to adult septic patients may be associated with reduced mortality. Treatment effects tended to be smaller or less consistent when including only those studies deemed adequate for each indicator. The available evidence is not clearly sufficient to support the widespread use of IVIgGM in the treatment of sepsis. Trial registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084120. Registered on 11 February 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0501-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6365591 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63655912019-02-27 The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis Cui, Jie Wei, Xuxia Lv, Haijin Li, Yuntao Li, Ping Chen, Zhen Liu, Genglong Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Sepsis is characterized by a complex immune response. This meta-analysis evaluated the clinical effectiveness of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (IVIgGM) in patients with sepsis and septic shock. METHODS: Four databases, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, the ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase, were systematically searched from inception to June 2018 to update the 2013 edition of the Cochrane review by two investigators, who independently selected studies, extracted relevant data, and evaluated study quality. Data were subjected to a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) for the primary and secondary outcomes. Level of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) scale. RESULTS: Nineteen studies comprising 1530 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled analyses showed that the use of IVIgGM reduced the mortality risk of septic patients (relative risk 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52–0.69, I(2) = 0%). TSA showed that IVIgGM had a significant effect on mortality. Additionally, the meta-analysis suggested that use of IVIgGM shortened length of mechanical ventilation (mean difference − 3.16 days; 95% CI − 5.71 to − 0.61 days) and did not shorten length of stay in the intensive care unit (mean difference − 0.38 days; 95% CI − 3.55 to 2.80 days). The GRADE scale showed that the certainty of the body of evidence was low for both benefits and IVIgGM. CONCLUSION: Administration of IVIgGM to adult septic patients may be associated with reduced mortality. Treatment effects tended to be smaller or less consistent when including only those studies deemed adequate for each indicator. The available evidence is not clearly sufficient to support the widespread use of IVIgGM in the treatment of sepsis. Trial registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42018084120. Registered on 11 February 2018. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s13613-019-0501-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6365591/ /pubmed/30725235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0501-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Cui, Jie Wei, Xuxia Lv, Haijin Li, Yuntao Li, Ping Chen, Zhen Liu, Genglong The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title | The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full | The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_fullStr | The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_short | The clinical efficacy of intravenous IgM-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
title_sort | clinical efficacy of intravenous igm-enriched immunoglobulin (pentaglobin) in sepsis or septic shock: a meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365591/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30725235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-019-0501-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cuijie theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT weixuxia theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT lvhaijin theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liyuntao theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liping theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT chenzhen theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liugenglong theclinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT cuijie clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT weixuxia clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT lvhaijin clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liyuntao clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liping clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT chenzhen clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis AT liugenglong clinicalefficacyofintravenousigmenrichedimmunoglobulinpentaglobininsepsisorsepticshockametaanalysiswithtrialsequentialanalysis |