Cargando…
Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-group cohort study of 46 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). PURPOSE: To assess the responsiveness of the Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI) and to determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the PFRI in a cohort of patients with CLBP....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Society of Spine Surgery
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326688 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0107 |
_version_ | 1783393487424585728 |
---|---|
author | Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin Komesh, Shiva Naghdi, Soofia Fakhari, Zahra Alaei, Parisa |
author_facet | Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin Komesh, Shiva Naghdi, Soofia Fakhari, Zahra Alaei, Parisa |
author_sort | Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin |
collection | PubMed |
description | STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-group cohort study of 46 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). PURPOSE: To assess the responsiveness of the Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI) and to determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the PFRI in a cohort of patients with CLBP. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRI is an instrument for assessing pain and disability in patients with low-back pain. No study so far has examined the responsiveness of the PFRI. METHODS: Forty-six patients with CLBP with a mean age of 50.33±14.28 completed the PFRI, the Persian Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after 10 physiotherapy sessions. A Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) was completed after treatment. RESULTS: The changes in PFRI scores were statistically significant using the paired t-test (p<0.001). The PFRI revealed high effect sizes (range, 0.93–1.82). The PFRI showed significant correlations with the VAS (0.86), the PRMDQ (0.66), and the GRCS (0.45). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the PFRI was good (0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.95). The MCIC for PFRI was 10.63 points. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the responsiveness of the PFRI in patients with CLBP and showed the amount of change in PFRI scores perceived as worthwhile by the patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6365792 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Korean Society of Spine Surgery |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63657922019-02-08 Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin Komesh, Shiva Naghdi, Soofia Fakhari, Zahra Alaei, Parisa Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-group cohort study of 46 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). PURPOSE: To assess the responsiveness of the Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI) and to determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the PFRI in a cohort of patients with CLBP. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRI is an instrument for assessing pain and disability in patients with low-back pain. No study so far has examined the responsiveness of the PFRI. METHODS: Forty-six patients with CLBP with a mean age of 50.33±14.28 completed the PFRI, the Persian Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after 10 physiotherapy sessions. A Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) was completed after treatment. RESULTS: The changes in PFRI scores were statistically significant using the paired t-test (p<0.001). The PFRI revealed high effect sizes (range, 0.93–1.82). The PFRI showed significant correlations with the VAS (0.86), the PRMDQ (0.66), and the GRCS (0.45). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the PFRI was good (0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.95). The MCIC for PFRI was 10.63 points. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the responsiveness of the PFRI in patients with CLBP and showed the amount of change in PFRI scores perceived as worthwhile by the patients. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-02 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6365792/ /pubmed/30326688 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0107 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin Komesh, Shiva Naghdi, Soofia Fakhari, Zahra Alaei, Parisa Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain |
title | Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_full | Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_fullStr | Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_full_unstemmed | Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_short | Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain |
title_sort | responsiveness of minimal clinically important change for the persian functional rating index in patients with chronic low back pain |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365792/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326688 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0107 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ansarinoureddinnakhostin responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain AT komeshshiva responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain AT naghdisoofia responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain AT fakharizahra responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain AT alaeiparisa responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain |