Cargando…

Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-group cohort study of 46 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). PURPOSE: To assess the responsiveness of the Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI) and to determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the PFRI in a cohort of patients with CLBP....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin, Komesh, Shiva, Naghdi, Soofia, Fakhari, Zahra, Alaei, Parisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326688
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0107
_version_ 1783393487424585728
author Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Komesh, Shiva
Naghdi, Soofia
Fakhari, Zahra
Alaei, Parisa
author_facet Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Komesh, Shiva
Naghdi, Soofia
Fakhari, Zahra
Alaei, Parisa
author_sort Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-group cohort study of 46 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). PURPOSE: To assess the responsiveness of the Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI) and to determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the PFRI in a cohort of patients with CLBP. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRI is an instrument for assessing pain and disability in patients with low-back pain. No study so far has examined the responsiveness of the PFRI. METHODS: Forty-six patients with CLBP with a mean age of 50.33±14.28 completed the PFRI, the Persian Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after 10 physiotherapy sessions. A Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) was completed after treatment. RESULTS: The changes in PFRI scores were statistically significant using the paired t-test (p<0.001). The PFRI revealed high effect sizes (range, 0.93–1.82). The PFRI showed significant correlations with the VAS (0.86), the PRMDQ (0.66), and the GRCS (0.45). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the PFRI was good (0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.95). The MCIC for PFRI was 10.63 points. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the responsiveness of the PFRI in patients with CLBP and showed the amount of change in PFRI scores perceived as worthwhile by the patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6365792
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63657922019-02-08 Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin Komesh, Shiva Naghdi, Soofia Fakhari, Zahra Alaei, Parisa Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, within-group cohort study of 46 patients with chronic low-back pain (CLBP). PURPOSE: To assess the responsiveness of the Persian Functional Rating Index (PFRI) and to determine the minimal clinically important change (MCIC) of the PFRI in a cohort of patients with CLBP. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: The FRI is an instrument for assessing pain and disability in patients with low-back pain. No study so far has examined the responsiveness of the PFRI. METHODS: Forty-six patients with CLBP with a mean age of 50.33±14.28 completed the PFRI, the Persian Roland–Morris Disability Questionnaire (PRMDQ), and a Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before and after 10 physiotherapy sessions. A Global Rating of Change Scale (GRCS) was completed after treatment. RESULTS: The changes in PFRI scores were statistically significant using the paired t-test (p<0.001). The PFRI revealed high effect sizes (range, 0.93–1.82). The PFRI showed significant correlations with the VAS (0.86), the PRMDQ (0.66), and the GRCS (0.45). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for the PFRI was good (0.76; 95% confidence interval, 0.56–0.95). The MCIC for PFRI was 10.63 points. CONCLUSIONS: The results supported the responsiveness of the PFRI in patients with CLBP and showed the amount of change in PFRI scores perceived as worthwhile by the patients. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2019-02 2018-10-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6365792/ /pubmed/30326688 http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0107 Text en Copyright © 2019 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Ansari, Noureddin Nakhostin
Komesh, Shiva
Naghdi, Soofia
Fakhari, Zahra
Alaei, Parisa
Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
title Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
title_fullStr Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
title_short Responsiveness of Minimal Clinically Important Change for the Persian Functional Rating Index in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain
title_sort responsiveness of minimal clinically important change for the persian functional rating index in patients with chronic low back pain
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30326688
http://dx.doi.org/10.31616/asj.2018.0107
work_keys_str_mv AT ansarinoureddinnakhostin responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain
AT komeshshiva responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain
AT naghdisoofia responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain
AT fakharizahra responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain
AT alaeiparisa responsivenessofminimalclinicallyimportantchangeforthepersianfunctionalratingindexinpatientswithchroniclowbackpain