Cargando…

Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints

In this work, aluminium–carbon-fibre reinforced plastic joints have been studied. Three types of samples were designed as double lap joints where the aluminium inserts were fabricated using both classical methods (milling) and additive manufacturing. Two versions of the joint were fabricated using a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jansson, Anton, Pejryd, Lars
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01200
_version_ 1783393490587090944
author Jansson, Anton
Pejryd, Lars
author_facet Jansson, Anton
Pejryd, Lars
author_sort Jansson, Anton
collection PubMed
description In this work, aluminium–carbon-fibre reinforced plastic joints have been studied. Three types of samples were designed as double lap joints where the aluminium inserts were fabricated using both classical methods (milling) and additive manufacturing. Two versions of the joint were fabricated using additive manufacturing, one flat, and the other with small teeth designed to hook into the carbon-fibre plies. The joints were characterised using a non-linear, dual-energy computed tomography method to evaluate the bond between the composite and the metal inserts. The mechanical strength of the bonds was evaluated, both through tensile tests and four-point bending. A simple finite element model was used to discuss the joints behaviour. It was found that the joints fabricated using additive manufactured inserts were more resistant to peel stress than the milled inserts. In four-point bending tests the moment that the joint could withstand was increased by roughly 300% with the use of additive manufacturing and 400% with the use of additive manufacturing and small teeth. However, in tensile tests it was found that the teeth design reduced the maximum load capacity of the joints by roughly 30% due to porosity. Further, it was found that the additive manufactured samples did not add to the capability of withstanding shear stress. The information gained with the dual-energy computed tomography method was highly valuable as the behaviour of the joints would have been difficult to explain without the porosity information.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6365805
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63658052019-02-15 Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints Jansson, Anton Pejryd, Lars Heliyon Article In this work, aluminium–carbon-fibre reinforced plastic joints have been studied. Three types of samples were designed as double lap joints where the aluminium inserts were fabricated using both classical methods (milling) and additive manufacturing. Two versions of the joint were fabricated using additive manufacturing, one flat, and the other with small teeth designed to hook into the carbon-fibre plies. The joints were characterised using a non-linear, dual-energy computed tomography method to evaluate the bond between the composite and the metal inserts. The mechanical strength of the bonds was evaluated, both through tensile tests and four-point bending. A simple finite element model was used to discuss the joints behaviour. It was found that the joints fabricated using additive manufactured inserts were more resistant to peel stress than the milled inserts. In four-point bending tests the moment that the joint could withstand was increased by roughly 300% with the use of additive manufacturing and 400% with the use of additive manufacturing and small teeth. However, in tensile tests it was found that the teeth design reduced the maximum load capacity of the joints by roughly 30% due to porosity. Further, it was found that the additive manufactured samples did not add to the capability of withstanding shear stress. The information gained with the dual-energy computed tomography method was highly valuable as the behaviour of the joints would have been difficult to explain without the porosity information. Elsevier 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6365805/ /pubmed/30839940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01200 Text en © 2019 Published by Elsevier Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Jansson, Anton
Pejryd, Lars
Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
title Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
title_full Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
title_fullStr Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
title_full_unstemmed Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
title_short Dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
title_sort dual-energy computed tomography investigation of additive manufacturing aluminium–carbon-fibre composite joints
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6365805/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30839940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01200
work_keys_str_mv AT janssonanton dualenergycomputedtomographyinvestigationofadditivemanufacturingaluminiumcarbonfibrecompositejoints
AT pejrydlars dualenergycomputedtomographyinvestigationofadditivemanufacturingaluminiumcarbonfibrecompositejoints