Cargando…

Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams

BACKGROUND: Health in All Policies (HiAP) is an intersectoral approach that facilitates decision-making among policy-makers to maximise positive health impacts of other public policies. Kenya, as a member of WHO, has committed to adopting HiAP, which has been included in the Kenya Health Policy for...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mauti, Joy, Gautier, Lara, De Neve, Jan-Walter, Beiersmann, Claudia, Tosun, Jale, Jahn, Albrecht
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0416-3
_version_ 1783393525794078720
author Mauti, Joy
Gautier, Lara
De Neve, Jan-Walter
Beiersmann, Claudia
Tosun, Jale
Jahn, Albrecht
author_facet Mauti, Joy
Gautier, Lara
De Neve, Jan-Walter
Beiersmann, Claudia
Tosun, Jale
Jahn, Albrecht
author_sort Mauti, Joy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health in All Policies (HiAP) is an intersectoral approach that facilitates decision-making among policy-makers to maximise positive health impacts of other public policies. Kenya, as a member of WHO, has committed to adopting HiAP, which has been included in the Kenya Health Policy for the period 2014–2030. This study aims to assess the extent to which this commitment is being translated into the process of governmental policy-making and supported by international development partners as well as non-state actors. METHODS: To examine HiAP in Kenya, a qualitative case study was performed, including a review of relevant policy documents. Furthermore, 40 key informants with diverse backgrounds (government, UN agencies, development agencies, civil society) were interviewed. Analysis was carried out using the main dimensions of Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach (problems, policy, politics). RESULTS: Kenya is facing major health challenges that are influenced by various social determinants, but the implementation of intersectoral action focusing on health promotion is still arbitrary. On the policy level, little is known about HiAP in other government ministries. Many health-related collaborations exist under the concept of intersectoral collaboration, which is prominent in the country’s development framework – Vision 2030 – but with no specific reference to HiAP. Under the political stream, the study highlights that political commitment from the highest office would facilitate mainstreaming the HiAP strategy, e.g. by setting up a department under the President’s Office. The budgeting process and planning for the Sustainable Development Goals were found to be potential windows of opportunity. CONCLUSION: While HiAP is being adopted as policy in Kenya, it is still perceived by many stakeholders as the business of the health sector, rather than a policy for the whole government and beyond. Kenya’s Vision 2030 should use HiAP to foster progress in all sectors with health promotion as an explicit goal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6366019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63660192019-02-15 Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams Mauti, Joy Gautier, Lara De Neve, Jan-Walter Beiersmann, Claudia Tosun, Jale Jahn, Albrecht Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: Health in All Policies (HiAP) is an intersectoral approach that facilitates decision-making among policy-makers to maximise positive health impacts of other public policies. Kenya, as a member of WHO, has committed to adopting HiAP, which has been included in the Kenya Health Policy for the period 2014–2030. This study aims to assess the extent to which this commitment is being translated into the process of governmental policy-making and supported by international development partners as well as non-state actors. METHODS: To examine HiAP in Kenya, a qualitative case study was performed, including a review of relevant policy documents. Furthermore, 40 key informants with diverse backgrounds (government, UN agencies, development agencies, civil society) were interviewed. Analysis was carried out using the main dimensions of Kingdon’s Multiple Streams Approach (problems, policy, politics). RESULTS: Kenya is facing major health challenges that are influenced by various social determinants, but the implementation of intersectoral action focusing on health promotion is still arbitrary. On the policy level, little is known about HiAP in other government ministries. Many health-related collaborations exist under the concept of intersectoral collaboration, which is prominent in the country’s development framework – Vision 2030 – but with no specific reference to HiAP. Under the political stream, the study highlights that political commitment from the highest office would facilitate mainstreaming the HiAP strategy, e.g. by setting up a department under the President’s Office. The budgeting process and planning for the Sustainable Development Goals were found to be potential windows of opportunity. CONCLUSION: While HiAP is being adopted as policy in Kenya, it is still perceived by many stakeholders as the business of the health sector, rather than a policy for the whole government and beyond. Kenya’s Vision 2030 should use HiAP to foster progress in all sectors with health promotion as an explicit goal. BioMed Central 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6366019/ /pubmed/30728042 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0416-3 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Mauti, Joy
Gautier, Lara
De Neve, Jan-Walter
Beiersmann, Claudia
Tosun, Jale
Jahn, Albrecht
Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams
title Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams
title_full Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams
title_fullStr Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams
title_full_unstemmed Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams
title_short Kenya’s Health in All Policies strategy: a policy analysis using Kingdon’s multiple streams
title_sort kenya’s health in all policies strategy: a policy analysis using kingdon’s multiple streams
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728042
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-019-0416-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mautijoy kenyashealthinallpoliciesstrategyapolicyanalysisusingkingdonsmultiplestreams
AT gautierlara kenyashealthinallpoliciesstrategyapolicyanalysisusingkingdonsmultiplestreams
AT denevejanwalter kenyashealthinallpoliciesstrategyapolicyanalysisusingkingdonsmultiplestreams
AT beiersmannclaudia kenyashealthinallpoliciesstrategyapolicyanalysisusingkingdonsmultiplestreams
AT tosunjale kenyashealthinallpoliciesstrategyapolicyanalysisusingkingdonsmultiplestreams
AT jahnalbrecht kenyashealthinallpoliciesstrategyapolicyanalysisusingkingdonsmultiplestreams