Cargando…
Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study
BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node (LN) dissection for advanced distal gastric cancer remains controversial. The present study compared the safety and efficacy of extended LN dissection (D2 plus) with standard D2 radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patient...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1572-1 |
_version_ | 1783393526275375104 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Pengfei Du, Yian Xu, Zhiyuan Huang, Ling Cheng, Xiangdong |
author_facet | Yu, Pengfei Du, Yian Xu, Zhiyuan Huang, Ling Cheng, Xiangdong |
author_sort | Yu, Pengfei |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node (LN) dissection for advanced distal gastric cancer remains controversial. The present study compared the safety and efficacy of extended LN dissection (D2 plus) with standard D2 radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: D2 group and D2 plus group. Patients in the D2 group received standard D2 LN dissection, while patients in the D2 plus group received an additional nos. 8p, 12b, 13, and 14v LNs dissection. The clinicopathological and surgical data of these two groups were compared, and the factors that may influence survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled, out of which 64 patients were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, and complications between the two groups. In the D2 plus group, the positive rate of the nos. 12b, 13, and 14v LN was 3.1%, 9.4%, and 12.5%, respectively. The positive rate of the no. 13 LN correlated with the duodenal involvement, while the positive rate of the no. 14v LN correlated with no. 6 LN metastasis. The survival analysis indicated that among patients with duodenum involvement, the 3-year disease-free survival rate of the D2 plus group was significantly better than that of the D2 group. CONCLUSION: Duodenum involvement and positive no. 6 LN were high-risk factors of advanced distal gastric cancer. D2 plus radical surgery turned out to be safe and feasible, and may improve the prognosis of these patients. However, further clinical trials are still warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01836991, registered on 22 April 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1572-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6366021 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63660212019-02-15 Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study Yu, Pengfei Du, Yian Xu, Zhiyuan Huang, Ling Cheng, Xiangdong World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The optimal extent of lymph node (LN) dissection for advanced distal gastric cancer remains controversial. The present study compared the safety and efficacy of extended LN dissection (D2 plus) with standard D2 radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer. METHODS: Eligible patients were enrolled and randomly assigned into two groups: D2 group and D2 plus group. Patients in the D2 group received standard D2 LN dissection, while patients in the D2 plus group received an additional nos. 8p, 12b, 13, and 14v LNs dissection. The clinicopathological and surgical data of these two groups were compared, and the factors that may influence survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventy patients were enrolled, out of which 64 patients were analyzed. There were no significant differences in the operative time, blood loss, and complications between the two groups. In the D2 plus group, the positive rate of the nos. 12b, 13, and 14v LN was 3.1%, 9.4%, and 12.5%, respectively. The positive rate of the no. 13 LN correlated with the duodenal involvement, while the positive rate of the no. 14v LN correlated with no. 6 LN metastasis. The survival analysis indicated that among patients with duodenum involvement, the 3-year disease-free survival rate of the D2 plus group was significantly better than that of the D2 group. CONCLUSION: Duodenum involvement and positive no. 6 LN were high-risk factors of advanced distal gastric cancer. D2 plus radical surgery turned out to be safe and feasible, and may improve the prognosis of these patients. However, further clinical trials are still warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01836991, registered on 22 April 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12957-019-1572-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6366021/ /pubmed/30728027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1572-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Yu, Pengfei Du, Yian Xu, Zhiyuan Huang, Ling Cheng, Xiangdong Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
title | Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
title_full | Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
title_fullStr | Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
title_short | Comparison of D2 and D2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
title_sort | comparison of d2 and d2 plus radical surgery for advanced distal gastric cancer: a randomized controlled study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366021/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728027 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-019-1572-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yupengfei comparisonofd2andd2plusradicalsurgeryforadvanceddistalgastriccancerarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT duyian comparisonofd2andd2plusradicalsurgeryforadvanceddistalgastriccancerarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT xuzhiyuan comparisonofd2andd2plusradicalsurgeryforadvanceddistalgastriccancerarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT huangling comparisonofd2andd2plusradicalsurgeryforadvanceddistalgastriccancerarandomizedcontrolledstudy AT chengxiangdong comparisonofd2andd2plusradicalsurgeryforadvanceddistalgastriccancerarandomizedcontrolledstudy |