Cargando…

Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design

BACKGROUOND: The purpose of this study was to examine resting the metabolic response to the ingestion of a complex containing Citrus Aurantium + Caffeine (CA + C) and if its consumption influences metabolic recovery following a high-intensity anaerobic exercise bout in habitual caffeine users. METHO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kliszczewicz, Brian, Bechke, Emily, Williamson, Cassie, Green, Zackery, Bailey, Paul, McLester, John, McLester, Cherilyn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0271-1
_version_ 1783393534977507328
author Kliszczewicz, Brian
Bechke, Emily
Williamson, Cassie
Green, Zackery
Bailey, Paul
McLester, John
McLester, Cherilyn
author_facet Kliszczewicz, Brian
Bechke, Emily
Williamson, Cassie
Green, Zackery
Bailey, Paul
McLester, John
McLester, Cherilyn
author_sort Kliszczewicz, Brian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUOND: The purpose of this study was to examine resting the metabolic response to the ingestion of a complex containing Citrus Aurantium + Caffeine (CA + C) and if its consumption influences metabolic recovery following a high-intensity anaerobic exercise bout in habitual caffeine users. METHODS: Ten physically active males (25.1 ± 3.9 years; weight 78.71 ± 9.53 kg; height 177.2 ± 4.6 cm; body fat 15.5 ± 3.13%) participated in this study. This study was performed in a double-blind, randomized crossover fashion consisting of two exhaustive exercise protocols. On each visit the participants consumed either a CA + C (100 mg of CA and 100 mg of C) or placebo (dextrose) capsule. After consumption, participants were monitored throughout a 45-min ingestion period, then completed a repeated Wingate protocol, and were then monitored throughout a 45-min recovery period. Metabolic function was measured through blood glucose, plasma insulin, plasma triglycerides, and plasma catecholamines: epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE). Biomarkers were taken at four different time points; Ingestion period: baseline (I1), post-ingestion period (I2); Recovery period: immediately post-exercise (R1), post-recovery period (R2). RESULTS: A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant time-dependent increases in plasma E and NE at I2 only in the CA + C trial (p < 0.05), and a significant decrease in blood glucose at I2 in the PLA trial (p < 0.05); however, no meaningful changes in glucose was observed following CA + C ingestion. No changes in insulin or triglycerides were observed during the ingestion period. No trial-dependent differences were observed in the Recovery period. All biomarkers of metabolic recovery were equivalent when evaluating R1 v R2. Participants recovered in a similar time-dependent manner in all markers of metabolism following the PLA and CA + C trials. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggested that normal recommended dosages of 100 mg CA + 100 mg C is sufficient to promote glucose sparing at rest, with modest increases in SNS activity; however, the individual role of CA or C in this response cannot be determined.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6366059
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63660592019-02-15 Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design Kliszczewicz, Brian Bechke, Emily Williamson, Cassie Green, Zackery Bailey, Paul McLester, John McLester, Cherilyn J Int Soc Sports Nutr Research Article BACKGROUOND: The purpose of this study was to examine resting the metabolic response to the ingestion of a complex containing Citrus Aurantium + Caffeine (CA + C) and if its consumption influences metabolic recovery following a high-intensity anaerobic exercise bout in habitual caffeine users. METHODS: Ten physically active males (25.1 ± 3.9 years; weight 78.71 ± 9.53 kg; height 177.2 ± 4.6 cm; body fat 15.5 ± 3.13%) participated in this study. This study was performed in a double-blind, randomized crossover fashion consisting of two exhaustive exercise protocols. On each visit the participants consumed either a CA + C (100 mg of CA and 100 mg of C) or placebo (dextrose) capsule. After consumption, participants were monitored throughout a 45-min ingestion period, then completed a repeated Wingate protocol, and were then monitored throughout a 45-min recovery period. Metabolic function was measured through blood glucose, plasma insulin, plasma triglycerides, and plasma catecholamines: epinephrine (E) and norepinephrine (NE). Biomarkers were taken at four different time points; Ingestion period: baseline (I1), post-ingestion period (I2); Recovery period: immediately post-exercise (R1), post-recovery period (R2). RESULTS: A repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant time-dependent increases in plasma E and NE at I2 only in the CA + C trial (p < 0.05), and a significant decrease in blood glucose at I2 in the PLA trial (p < 0.05); however, no meaningful changes in glucose was observed following CA + C ingestion. No changes in insulin or triglycerides were observed during the ingestion period. No trial-dependent differences were observed in the Recovery period. All biomarkers of metabolic recovery were equivalent when evaluating R1 v R2. Participants recovered in a similar time-dependent manner in all markers of metabolism following the PLA and CA + C trials. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study suggested that normal recommended dosages of 100 mg CA + 100 mg C is sufficient to promote glucose sparing at rest, with modest increases in SNS activity; however, the individual role of CA or C in this response cannot be determined. BioMed Central 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6366059/ /pubmed/30728061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0271-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kliszczewicz, Brian
Bechke, Emily
Williamson, Cassie
Green, Zackery
Bailey, Paul
McLester, John
McLester, Cherilyn
Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
title Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
title_full Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
title_fullStr Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
title_full_unstemmed Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
title_short Citrus Aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
title_sort citrus aurantium and caffeine complex versus placebo on biomarkers of metabolism: a double blind crossover design
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366059/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12970-019-0271-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kliszczewiczbrian citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign
AT bechkeemily citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign
AT williamsoncassie citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign
AT greenzackery citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign
AT baileypaul citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign
AT mclesterjohn citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign
AT mclestercherilyn citrusaurantiumandcaffeinecomplexversusplaceboonbiomarkersofmetabolismadoubleblindcrossoverdesign