Cargando…

Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018

Since 2004, podcasts have emerged as a decentralized medium for science communication to the global public. However, to date, there have been no large-scale quantitative studies of the production and dissemination of science podcasts. This study identified 952 English language science podcasts avail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: MacKenzie, Lewis E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30800351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180932
_version_ 1783393565466951680
author MacKenzie, Lewis E.
author_facet MacKenzie, Lewis E.
author_sort MacKenzie, Lewis E.
collection PubMed
description Since 2004, podcasts have emerged as a decentralized medium for science communication to the global public. However, to date, there have been no large-scale quantitative studies of the production and dissemination of science podcasts. This study identified 952 English language science podcasts available between January and February 2018 and analysed online textual and visual data related to the podcasts and classified and noted key production parameters. It was found that the total number of science podcast series available grew linearly between 2004 and 2010, and then exponentially between 2010 and 2018. Sixty-five per cent of science podcast series were hosted by scientists and 77% were targeted to public audiences. Although a wide range of primarily single-subject science podcasts series were noted, 34% of science podcast series were not dedicated to a science subject. Compared to biology and physics, chemistry may be under-represented by science podcasts. Only 24% of science podcast series had any overt financial income. Sixty-two per cent of science podcast series were affiliated to an organization; producing a greater number of episodes (median = 24, average = 96) than independent science podcast series (median = 16, average = 48). This study provides the first ‘snapshot’ of how science podcasts are being used to communicate science to public audiences around the globe.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6366159
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63661592019-02-22 Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018 MacKenzie, Lewis E. R Soc Open Sci Computer Science Since 2004, podcasts have emerged as a decentralized medium for science communication to the global public. However, to date, there have been no large-scale quantitative studies of the production and dissemination of science podcasts. This study identified 952 English language science podcasts available between January and February 2018 and analysed online textual and visual data related to the podcasts and classified and noted key production parameters. It was found that the total number of science podcast series available grew linearly between 2004 and 2010, and then exponentially between 2010 and 2018. Sixty-five per cent of science podcast series were hosted by scientists and 77% were targeted to public audiences. Although a wide range of primarily single-subject science podcasts series were noted, 34% of science podcast series were not dedicated to a science subject. Compared to biology and physics, chemistry may be under-represented by science podcasts. Only 24% of science podcast series had any overt financial income. Sixty-two per cent of science podcast series were affiliated to an organization; producing a greater number of episodes (median = 24, average = 96) than independent science podcast series (median = 16, average = 48). This study provides the first ‘snapshot’ of how science podcasts are being used to communicate science to public audiences around the globe. The Royal Society Publishing 2019-01-09 /pmc/articles/PMC6366159/ /pubmed/30800351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180932 Text en © 2019 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Computer Science
MacKenzie, Lewis E.
Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
title Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
title_full Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
title_fullStr Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
title_full_unstemmed Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
title_short Science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
title_sort science podcasts: analysis of global production and output from 2004 to 2018
topic Computer Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366159/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30800351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.180932
work_keys_str_mv AT mackenzielewise sciencepodcastsanalysisofglobalproductionandoutputfrom2004to2018