Cargando…

Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial

BACKGROUND: This paper describes the trial of a novel intervention, Supporting Policy In health with evidence from Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT). It examines (1) the feasibility of delivering this kind of programme in practice; (2) its acceptability to participants; (3) the impact of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Williamson, Anna, Barker, Daniel, Green, Sally, D’Este, Catherine, Davies, Huw T. O., Jorm, Louisa, Shakeshaft, Anthony, Rudge, Sian, Redman, Sally
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8
_version_ 1783393603194716160
author Williamson, Anna
Barker, Daniel
Green, Sally
D’Este, Catherine
Davies, Huw T. O.
Jorm, Louisa
Shakeshaft, Anthony
Rudge, Sian
Redman, Sally
author_facet Williamson, Anna
Barker, Daniel
Green, Sally
D’Este, Catherine
Davies, Huw T. O.
Jorm, Louisa
Shakeshaft, Anthony
Rudge, Sian
Redman, Sally
author_sort Williamson, Anna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This paper describes the trial of a novel intervention, Supporting Policy In health with evidence from Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT). It examines (1) the feasibility of delivering this kind of programme in practice; (2) its acceptability to participants; (3) the impact of the programme on the capacity of policy agencies to engage with research; and (4) the engagement with and use of research by policy agencies. METHODS: SPIRIT was a multifaceted, highly tailored, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, trial involving six health policy agencies in Sydney, Australia. Agencies were randomly allocated to one of three start dates to receive the 1-year intervention programme. SPIRIT included audit, feedback and goal setting; a leadership programme; staff training; the opportunity to test systems to facilitate research use in policies; and exchange with researchers. Outcome measures were collected at each agency every 6 months for 30 months. RESULTS: Participation in SPIRIT was associated with significant increases in research use capacity at staff and agency levels. Staff reported increased confidence in research use skills, and agency leaders reported more extensive systems and structures in place to support research use. Self-report data suggested there was also an increase in tactical research use among agency staff. Given the relatively small numbers of participating agencies and the complexity of their contexts, findings suggest it is possible to effect change in the way policy agencies approach the use of research. This is supported by the responses on the other trial measures; while these were not statistically significant, on 18 of the 20 different measures used, the changes observed were consistent with the hypothesised intervention effect (that is, positive impacts). CONCLUSIONS: As an early test of an innovative approach, SPIRIT has demonstrated that it is possible to increase research engagement and use in policy agencies. While more work is needed to establish the replicability and generalisability of these findings, this trial suggests that building staff skills and organisational structures may be effective in increasing evidence use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6366302
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63663022019-02-15 Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial Williamson, Anna Barker, Daniel Green, Sally D’Este, Catherine Davies, Huw T. O. Jorm, Louisa Shakeshaft, Anthony Rudge, Sian Redman, Sally Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: This paper describes the trial of a novel intervention, Supporting Policy In health with evidence from Research: an Intervention Trial (SPIRIT). It examines (1) the feasibility of delivering this kind of programme in practice; (2) its acceptability to participants; (3) the impact of the programme on the capacity of policy agencies to engage with research; and (4) the engagement with and use of research by policy agencies. METHODS: SPIRIT was a multifaceted, highly tailored, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomised, trial involving six health policy agencies in Sydney, Australia. Agencies were randomly allocated to one of three start dates to receive the 1-year intervention programme. SPIRIT included audit, feedback and goal setting; a leadership programme; staff training; the opportunity to test systems to facilitate research use in policies; and exchange with researchers. Outcome measures were collected at each agency every 6 months for 30 months. RESULTS: Participation in SPIRIT was associated with significant increases in research use capacity at staff and agency levels. Staff reported increased confidence in research use skills, and agency leaders reported more extensive systems and structures in place to support research use. Self-report data suggested there was also an increase in tactical research use among agency staff. Given the relatively small numbers of participating agencies and the complexity of their contexts, findings suggest it is possible to effect change in the way policy agencies approach the use of research. This is supported by the responses on the other trial measures; while these were not statistically significant, on 18 of the 20 different measures used, the changes observed were consistent with the hypothesised intervention effect (that is, positive impacts). CONCLUSIONS: As an early test of an innovative approach, SPIRIT has demonstrated that it is possible to increase research engagement and use in policy agencies. While more work is needed to establish the replicability and generalisability of these findings, this trial suggests that building staff skills and organisational structures may be effective in increasing evidence use. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-06 /pmc/articles/PMC6366302/ /pubmed/30728034 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Williamson, Anna
Barker, Daniel
Green, Sally
D’Este, Catherine
Davies, Huw T. O.
Jorm, Louisa
Shakeshaft, Anthony
Rudge, Sian
Redman, Sally
Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
title Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
title_full Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
title_fullStr Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
title_full_unstemmed Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
title_short Increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
title_sort increasing the capacity of policy agencies to use research findings: a stepped-wedge trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366302/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30728034
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12961-018-0408-8
work_keys_str_mv AT williamsonanna increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT barkerdaniel increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT greensally increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT destecatherine increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT davieshuwto increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT jormlouisa increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT shakeshaftanthony increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT rudgesian increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial
AT redmansally increasingthecapacityofpolicyagenciestouseresearchfindingsasteppedwedgetrial