Cargando…

Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing numbers of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures being carried out, the frequency of major acetabular defects is also rising. A combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup has been used in our department since 2007 in order to reduce the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schmidt-Braekling, Tom, Sieber, Dorothee, Gosheger, Georg, Theil, Jan C., Moellenbeck, Burkhard, Andreou, Dimosthenis, Dieckmann, Ralf
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30730966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212072
_version_ 1783393647624978432
author Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
Sieber, Dorothee
Gosheger, Georg
Theil, Jan C.
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Dieckmann, Ralf
author_facet Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
Sieber, Dorothee
Gosheger, Georg
Theil, Jan C.
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Dieckmann, Ralf
author_sort Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing numbers of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures being carried out, the frequency of major acetabular defects is also rising. A combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup has been used in our department since 2007 in order to reduce the dislocation rate associated with complex defects. Although both implants have an important place in endoprosthetics, there are as yet limited data on the dislocation and complication rates with this combination. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients in whom a Burch–Schneider cage and a dual mobility cup were implanted in our department between 2007 and 2014 and who had a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. RESULTS: The study included 79 patients with a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years. The implant survival rate was 85% at 65 months. Postoperative dislocation occurred in two cases (2.1%), with the first dislocation taking place within the first 3 weeks in both of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows a promising dislocation rate with a combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup. Particularly in the medium-term follow-up, no further dislocations occurred in the study. A maximum cup inclination of 45° in revision cases was associated with a lower dislocation rate in this group of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6366705
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63667052019-02-22 Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe? Schmidt-Braekling, Tom Sieber, Dorothee Gosheger, Georg Theil, Jan C. Moellenbeck, Burkhard Andreou, Dimosthenis Dieckmann, Ralf PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing numbers of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures being carried out, the frequency of major acetabular defects is also rising. A combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup has been used in our department since 2007 in order to reduce the dislocation rate associated with complex defects. Although both implants have an important place in endoprosthetics, there are as yet limited data on the dislocation and complication rates with this combination. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients in whom a Burch–Schneider cage and a dual mobility cup were implanted in our department between 2007 and 2014 and who had a minimum follow-up period of 24 months. RESULTS: The study included 79 patients with a mean follow-up period of 5.3 years. The implant survival rate was 85% at 65 months. Postoperative dislocation occurred in two cases (2.1%), with the first dislocation taking place within the first 3 weeks in both of these patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows a promising dislocation rate with a combination of an anti-protrusio cage and a dual mobility cup. Particularly in the medium-term follow-up, no further dislocations occurred in the study. A maximum cup inclination of 45° in revision cases was associated with a lower dislocation rate in this group of patients. Public Library of Science 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6366705/ /pubmed/30730966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212072 Text en © 2019 Schmidt-Braekling et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Schmidt-Braekling, Tom
Sieber, Dorothee
Gosheger, Georg
Theil, Jan C.
Moellenbeck, Burkhard
Andreou, Dimosthenis
Dieckmann, Ralf
Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?
title Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?
title_full Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?
title_fullStr Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?
title_full_unstemmed Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?
title_short Dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: Are we safe?
title_sort dislocation rates with combinations of anti-protrusio cages and dual mobility cups in revision cases: are we safe?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366705/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30730966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212072
work_keys_str_mv AT schmidtbraeklingtom dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe
AT sieberdorothee dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe
AT goshegergeorg dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe
AT theiljanc dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe
AT moellenbeckburkhard dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe
AT andreoudimosthenis dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe
AT dieckmannralf dislocationrateswithcombinationsofantiprotrusiocagesanddualmobilitycupsinrevisioncasesarewesafe