Cargando…

Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior

The evolution of new species is made easier when traits under divergent ecological selection are also mating cues. Such ecological mating cues are now considered more common than previously thought, but we still know little about the genetic changes underlying their evolution or more generally about...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merrill, Richard M., Rastas, Pasi, Martin, Simon H., Melo, Maria C., Barker, Sarah, Davey, John, McMillan, W. Owen, Jiggins, Chris D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30730873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005902
_version_ 1783393660139732992
author Merrill, Richard M.
Rastas, Pasi
Martin, Simon H.
Melo, Maria C.
Barker, Sarah
Davey, John
McMillan, W. Owen
Jiggins, Chris D.
author_facet Merrill, Richard M.
Rastas, Pasi
Martin, Simon H.
Melo, Maria C.
Barker, Sarah
Davey, John
McMillan, W. Owen
Jiggins, Chris D.
author_sort Merrill, Richard M.
collection PubMed
description The evolution of new species is made easier when traits under divergent ecological selection are also mating cues. Such ecological mating cues are now considered more common than previously thought, but we still know little about the genetic changes underlying their evolution or more generally about the genetic basis for assortative mating behaviors. Both tight physical linkage and the existence of large-effect preference loci will strengthen genetic associations between behavioral and ecological barriers, promoting the evolution of assortative mating. The warning patterns of Heliconius melpomene and H. cydno are under disruptive selection due to increased predation of nonmimetic hybrids and are used during mate recognition. We carried out a genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of preference behaviors between these species and showed that divergent male preference has a simple genetic basis. We identify three QTLs that together explain a large proportion (approximately 60%) of the difference in preference behavior observed between the parental species. One of these QTLs is just 1.2 (0–4.8) centiMorgans (cM) from the major color pattern gene optix, and, individually, all three have a large effect on the preference phenotype. Genomic divergence between H. cydno and H. melpomene is high but broadly heterogenous, and admixture is reduced at the preference–optix color pattern locus but not the other preference QTLs. The simple genetic architecture we reveal will facilitate the evolution and maintenance of new species despite ongoing gene flow by coupling behavioral and ecological aspects of reproductive isolation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6366751
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63667512019-02-22 Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior Merrill, Richard M. Rastas, Pasi Martin, Simon H. Melo, Maria C. Barker, Sarah Davey, John McMillan, W. Owen Jiggins, Chris D. PLoS Biol Research Article The evolution of new species is made easier when traits under divergent ecological selection are also mating cues. Such ecological mating cues are now considered more common than previously thought, but we still know little about the genetic changes underlying their evolution or more generally about the genetic basis for assortative mating behaviors. Both tight physical linkage and the existence of large-effect preference loci will strengthen genetic associations between behavioral and ecological barriers, promoting the evolution of assortative mating. The warning patterns of Heliconius melpomene and H. cydno are under disruptive selection due to increased predation of nonmimetic hybrids and are used during mate recognition. We carried out a genome-wide quantitative trait locus (QTL) analysis of preference behaviors between these species and showed that divergent male preference has a simple genetic basis. We identify three QTLs that together explain a large proportion (approximately 60%) of the difference in preference behavior observed between the parental species. One of these QTLs is just 1.2 (0–4.8) centiMorgans (cM) from the major color pattern gene optix, and, individually, all three have a large effect on the preference phenotype. Genomic divergence between H. cydno and H. melpomene is high but broadly heterogenous, and admixture is reduced at the preference–optix color pattern locus but not the other preference QTLs. The simple genetic architecture we reveal will facilitate the evolution and maintenance of new species despite ongoing gene flow by coupling behavioral and ecological aspects of reproductive isolation. Public Library of Science 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6366751/ /pubmed/30730873 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005902 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) public domain dedication.
spellingShingle Research Article
Merrill, Richard M.
Rastas, Pasi
Martin, Simon H.
Melo, Maria C.
Barker, Sarah
Davey, John
McMillan, W. Owen
Jiggins, Chris D.
Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
title Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
title_full Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
title_fullStr Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
title_full_unstemmed Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
title_short Genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
title_sort genetic dissection of assortative mating behavior
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6366751/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30730873
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2005902
work_keys_str_mv AT merrillrichardm geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT rastaspasi geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT martinsimonh geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT melomariac geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT barkersarah geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT daveyjohn geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT mcmillanwowen geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior
AT jigginschrisd geneticdissectionofassortativematingbehavior