Cargando…
Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies
Here we quantify and compare the absolute and relative overall survival (OS) benefits conveyed by complete remission (CR) in AML and high-risk MDS, and by CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) in AML and by hematologic improvement (HI) in MDS, following treatment with 7+3 versus azacytidine. We co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30315234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0275-x |
_version_ | 1783393709142835200 |
---|---|
author | Othus, Megan Sekeres, Mikkael A. Nand, Sucha Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Appelbaum, Frederick R. Erba, Harry P. Estey, Eli |
author_facet | Othus, Megan Sekeres, Mikkael A. Nand, Sucha Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Appelbaum, Frederick R. Erba, Harry P. Estey, Eli |
author_sort | Othus, Megan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Here we quantify and compare the absolute and relative overall survival (OS) benefits conveyed by complete remission (CR) in AML and high-risk MDS, and by CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) in AML and by hematologic improvement (HI) in MDS, following treatment with 7+3 versus azacytidine. We compared patients receiving 7+3 in SWOG studies S0106 (n=301) and S1203 (n=261) enrolling adults ≤ 60 years, with patients receiving azacytidine therapies in S0703 (n=133 AML patients ≥ 60) and S1117 (n=277 MDS patients ≥ 18). Absolute survival benefit was evaluated with 1-year, 3-year, and median OS; relative benefit was evaluated with univariate and covariate–adjusted hazard ratios. CR conveyed a relative survival advantage in multivariable analysis, with a similar relative effect of CR across studies. CR also conferred an absolute survival benefit, but with a smaller magnitude of absolute benefit in the azacytidine trials. In AML, OS was similar for CRi and failure to achieve CR/CRi. In MDS, CR conferred a survival advantage versus HI, and HI did versus failure. The relative survival benefit of CR was similar regardless of initial therapy for AML or high-risk MDS. With both therapies, CR has a beneficial effect on survival compared to CRi or HI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6367029 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63670292019-04-12 Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies Othus, Megan Sekeres, Mikkael A. Nand, Sucha Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Appelbaum, Frederick R. Erba, Harry P. Estey, Eli Leukemia Article Here we quantify and compare the absolute and relative overall survival (OS) benefits conveyed by complete remission (CR) in AML and high-risk MDS, and by CR with incomplete count recovery (CRi) in AML and by hematologic improvement (HI) in MDS, following treatment with 7+3 versus azacytidine. We compared patients receiving 7+3 in SWOG studies S0106 (n=301) and S1203 (n=261) enrolling adults ≤ 60 years, with patients receiving azacytidine therapies in S0703 (n=133 AML patients ≥ 60) and S1117 (n=277 MDS patients ≥ 18). Absolute survival benefit was evaluated with 1-year, 3-year, and median OS; relative benefit was evaluated with univariate and covariate–adjusted hazard ratios. CR conveyed a relative survival advantage in multivariable analysis, with a similar relative effect of CR across studies. CR also conferred an absolute survival benefit, but with a smaller magnitude of absolute benefit in the azacytidine trials. In AML, OS was similar for CRi and failure to achieve CR/CRi. In MDS, CR conferred a survival advantage versus HI, and HI did versus failure. The relative survival benefit of CR was similar regardless of initial therapy for AML or high-risk MDS. With both therapies, CR has a beneficial effect on survival compared to CRi or HI. 2018-10-12 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6367029/ /pubmed/30315234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0275-x Text en Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use:http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Othus, Megan Sekeres, Mikkael A. Nand, Sucha Garcia-Manero, Guillermo Appelbaum, Frederick R. Erba, Harry P. Estey, Eli Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies |
title | Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies |
title_full | Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies |
title_fullStr | Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies |
title_short | Relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:An analysis of four SWOG studies |
title_sort | relative survival following response to 7+3 versus azacytidine is similar in acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes:an analysis of four swog studies |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367029/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30315234 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41375-018-0275-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT othusmegan relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies AT sekeresmikkaela relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies AT nandsucha relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies AT garciamaneroguillermo relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies AT appelbaumfrederickr relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies AT erbaharryp relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies AT esteyeli relativesurvivalfollowingresponseto73versusazacytidineissimilarinacutemyeloidleukemiaandhighriskmyelodysplasticsyndromesananalysisoffourswogstudies |