Cargando…

Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis

The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of a static flexural test, the biomechanical parameters necessary for the occurrence of a proximal femoral fracture in a synthetic bone model after the removal of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Freitas, Anderson, Breta, Jhefferson B, Júnior, Joubert, Shimano, Antônio C, Daher, Walter R, Bessa, Munir, De Alcantara, Weverton P, Ramos, Lucas Sacramento, Dantas, Ergon L, Aquino, Ruben J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761232
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3680
_version_ 1783393721992085504
author Freitas, Anderson
Breta, Jhefferson B
Júnior, Joubert
Shimano, Antônio C
Daher, Walter R
Bessa, Munir
De Alcantara, Weverton P
Ramos, Lucas Sacramento
Dantas, Ergon L
Aquino, Ruben J
author_facet Freitas, Anderson
Breta, Jhefferson B
Júnior, Joubert
Shimano, Antônio C
Daher, Walter R
Bessa, Munir
De Alcantara, Weverton P
Ramos, Lucas Sacramento
Dantas, Ergon L
Aquino, Ruben J
author_sort Freitas, Anderson
collection PubMed
description The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of a static flexural test, the biomechanical parameters necessary for the occurrence of a proximal femoral fracture in a synthetic bone model after the removal of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Twenty synthetic bones made of the same material and from the same manufacturer were used: ten units as the control group (CG), five units as the test group without reinforcement (TG), and five units as the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall over the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the control group, the assay was performed with its integrity preserved. In the TG and TGR groups, a DHS model was introduced, and the tests were performed as follows: TG after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR group, after removal of the synthesis material and filling the orifice of the femoral neck with PMMA. All groups presented with a basicervical fracture of the femoral neck. The CG group presented a mean of 935 newtons (N) of maximum load and 7.0 joules (J) of energy for fracture occurrence. TG and TGR groups presented, respectively, a maximum load of 750 N and 1,068 N, and energy of 6.0 J and 7.3 J. According to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), there was no significant difference in flow load (p = 0.16), energy to flow (p = 0.16), stiffness (p = 0.28), maximum load (p = 0.10), and energy to fracture (p = 0.54) between the studied groups. The removal of the DHS implant from the synthetic bone did not present a significant increase of the maximum load and the energy necessary for the occurrence of a fracture with the use of the PMMA reinforcement technique.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63671152019-02-13 Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis Freitas, Anderson Breta, Jhefferson B Júnior, Joubert Shimano, Antônio C Daher, Walter R Bessa, Munir De Alcantara, Weverton P Ramos, Lucas Sacramento Dantas, Ergon L Aquino, Ruben J Cureus Orthopedics The objective of this study was to evaluate, by means of a static flexural test, the biomechanical parameters necessary for the occurrence of a proximal femoral fracture in a synthetic bone model after the removal of a dynamic hip screw (DHS) and comparing the results obtained with a reinforcement technique using polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). Twenty synthetic bones made of the same material and from the same manufacturer were used: ten units as the control group (CG), five units as the test group without reinforcement (TG), and five units as the test group with reinforcement (TGR). The biomechanical analysis was performed simulating a fall over the trochanter using a servo-hydraulic machine. In the control group, the assay was performed with its integrity preserved. In the TG and TGR groups, a DHS model was introduced, and the tests were performed as follows: TG after simple removal of the synthesis material, and in the TGR group, after removal of the synthesis material and filling the orifice of the femoral neck with PMMA. All groups presented with a basicervical fracture of the femoral neck. The CG group presented a mean of 935 newtons (N) of maximum load and 7.0 joules (J) of energy for fracture occurrence. TG and TGR groups presented, respectively, a maximum load of 750 N and 1,068 N, and energy of 6.0 J and 7.3 J. According to the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), there was no significant difference in flow load (p = 0.16), energy to flow (p = 0.16), stiffness (p = 0.28), maximum load (p = 0.10), and energy to fracture (p = 0.54) between the studied groups. The removal of the DHS implant from the synthetic bone did not present a significant increase of the maximum load and the energy necessary for the occurrence of a fracture with the use of the PMMA reinforcement technique. Cureus 2018-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC6367115/ /pubmed/30761232 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3680 Text en Copyright © 2018, Freitas et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Orthopedics
Freitas, Anderson
Breta, Jhefferson B
Júnior, Joubert
Shimano, Antônio C
Daher, Walter R
Bessa, Munir
De Alcantara, Weverton P
Ramos, Lucas Sacramento
Dantas, Ergon L
Aquino, Ruben J
Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis
title Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis
title_full Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis
title_fullStr Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis
title_short Biomechanical Test Following Removal of a Dynamic Hip Screw: In Vitro Analysis
title_sort biomechanical test following removal of a dynamic hip screw: in vitro analysis
topic Orthopedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761232
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3680
work_keys_str_mv AT freitasanderson biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT bretajheffersonb biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT juniorjoubert biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT shimanoantonioc biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT daherwalterr biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT bessamunir biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT dealcantarawevertonp biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT ramoslucassacramento biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT dantasergonl biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis
AT aquinorubenj biomechanicaltestfollowingremovalofadynamichipscrewinvitroanalysis