Cargando…

Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound

Time is talked about in terms of space more frequently than the other way around. Some have suggested that this asymmetry runs deeper than language. The idea that we think about abstract domains (like time) in terms of relatively more concrete domains (like space) but not vice versa can be traced to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kranjec, Alexander, Lehet, Matthew, Woods, Adam J., Chatterjee, Anjan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00048
_version_ 1783393736274739200
author Kranjec, Alexander
Lehet, Matthew
Woods, Adam J.
Chatterjee, Anjan
author_facet Kranjec, Alexander
Lehet, Matthew
Woods, Adam J.
Chatterjee, Anjan
author_sort Kranjec, Alexander
collection PubMed
description Time is talked about in terms of space more frequently than the other way around. Some have suggested that this asymmetry runs deeper than language. The idea that we think about abstract domains (like time) in terms of relatively more concrete domains (like space) but not vice versa can be traced to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. This theoretical account has some empirical support. Previous experiments suggest an embodied basis for space-time asymmetries that runs deeper than language. However, these studies frequently involve verbal and/or visual stimuli. Because vision makes a privileged contribution to spatial processing it is unclear whether these results speak to a general asymmetry between time and space based on each domain’s general level of relative abstractness, or reflect modality-specific effects. The present study was motivated by this uncertainty and what appears to be audition’s privileged contribution to temporal processing. In Experiment 1, using an auditory perceptual task, temporal duration and spatial displacement were shown to be mutually contagious. Irrelevant temporal information influenced spatial judgments and vice versa with a larger effect of time on space. Experiment 2 examined the mutual effects of space, time, and pitch. Pitch was investigated because it is a fundamental characteristic of sound perception. It was reasoned that if space is indeed less relevant to audition than time, then spatial distance judgments should be more easily contaminated by variations in auditory frequency, while variations in distance should be less effective in contaminating pitch perception. While time and pitch were shown to be mutually contagious in Experiment 2, irrelevant variation in auditory frequency affected estimates of spatial distance while variations in spatial distance did not affect pitch judgments. Results overall suggest that the perceptual asymmetry between spatial and temporal domains does not necessarily generalize across modalities, and that time is not generally more abstract than space.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367220
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63672202019-02-15 Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound Kranjec, Alexander Lehet, Matthew Woods, Adam J. Chatterjee, Anjan Front Psychol Psychology Time is talked about in terms of space more frequently than the other way around. Some have suggested that this asymmetry runs deeper than language. The idea that we think about abstract domains (like time) in terms of relatively more concrete domains (like space) but not vice versa can be traced to Conceptual Metaphor Theory. This theoretical account has some empirical support. Previous experiments suggest an embodied basis for space-time asymmetries that runs deeper than language. However, these studies frequently involve verbal and/or visual stimuli. Because vision makes a privileged contribution to spatial processing it is unclear whether these results speak to a general asymmetry between time and space based on each domain’s general level of relative abstractness, or reflect modality-specific effects. The present study was motivated by this uncertainty and what appears to be audition’s privileged contribution to temporal processing. In Experiment 1, using an auditory perceptual task, temporal duration and spatial displacement were shown to be mutually contagious. Irrelevant temporal information influenced spatial judgments and vice versa with a larger effect of time on space. Experiment 2 examined the mutual effects of space, time, and pitch. Pitch was investigated because it is a fundamental characteristic of sound perception. It was reasoned that if space is indeed less relevant to audition than time, then spatial distance judgments should be more easily contaminated by variations in auditory frequency, while variations in distance should be less effective in contaminating pitch perception. While time and pitch were shown to be mutually contagious in Experiment 2, irrelevant variation in auditory frequency affected estimates of spatial distance while variations in spatial distance did not affect pitch judgments. Results overall suggest that the perceptual asymmetry between spatial and temporal domains does not necessarily generalize across modalities, and that time is not generally more abstract than space. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-01 /pmc/articles/PMC6367220/ /pubmed/30774606 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00048 Text en Copyright © 2019 Kranjec, Lehet, Woods and Chatterjee. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Kranjec, Alexander
Lehet, Matthew
Woods, Adam J.
Chatterjee, Anjan
Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
title Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
title_full Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
title_fullStr Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
title_full_unstemmed Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
title_short Time Is Not More Abstract Than Space in Sound
title_sort time is not more abstract than space in sound
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367220/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774606
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00048
work_keys_str_mv AT kranjecalexander timeisnotmoreabstractthanspaceinsound
AT lehetmatthew timeisnotmoreabstractthanspaceinsound
AT woodsadamj timeisnotmoreabstractthanspaceinsound
AT chatterjeeanjan timeisnotmoreabstractthanspaceinsound