Cargando…
The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke
BACKGROUND: To estimate the additional impact of coping and of being dependent on caregivers, over and above the large effects of disability on utility after ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 539 patients were recruited into an observational, retrospective study when returning for a check-up betw...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1069-6 |
_version_ | 1783393866751148032 |
---|---|
author | Dewilde, Sarah Annemans, Lieven Lloyd, Andrew Peeters, Andre Hemelsoet, Dimitri Vandermeeren, Yves Desfontaines, Philippe Brouns, Raf Vanhooren, Geert Cras, Patrick Michielsens, Boudewijn Redondo, Patricia Thijs, Vincent |
author_facet | Dewilde, Sarah Annemans, Lieven Lloyd, Andrew Peeters, Andre Hemelsoet, Dimitri Vandermeeren, Yves Desfontaines, Philippe Brouns, Raf Vanhooren, Geert Cras, Patrick Michielsens, Boudewijn Redondo, Patricia Thijs, Vincent |
author_sort | Dewilde, Sarah |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To estimate the additional impact of coping and of being dependent on caregivers, over and above the large effects of disability on utility after ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 539 patients were recruited into an observational, retrospective study when returning for a check-up between 3 and 36 months after an ischemic stroke. Patients’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS), dependency on caregivers, the Brandtstädter and Renner Coping questionnaire (with summary scores: Tenacity of Goal Pursuit (TGP) and Flexible Goal Adjustment (FGA) coping styles), EQ-5D-3 L and co-morbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: In multivariable regression, greater disability (mRS) resulted in large utility losses, between 0.06 for mRS 1 to 0.65 for mRS 5 (p < 0.0001). Dependency on caregivers caused an additional dis-utility of 0.104 (p = 0.0006) which varied by mRS (0.044, 0.060, 0.083, 0.115, 0.150 and 0.173 for mRS 0–5). The effect of coping on utility varied by coping style, by the disability level of the patient and by his or her dependency on caregivers. FGA coping was associated with additional increases in utility (p < 0.0001) over and above the effect of disability and dependency, whereas TGA had no significant impact. FGA coping was associated with larger utility changes among more disabled patients (0.018 to 0.105 additional utility, for mRS 0 to mRS 5 respectively). Dependent patients had more to gain from FGA coping than patients who function independently of caregivers: utility gains were between 0.049 and 0.072 for moderate to high levels of FGA coping. In contrast, the same positive evolution in FGA coping resulted in 0.039 and 0.057 utility gain among independent patients. Finally, we found that important stroke risk factors and co-morbidities, such as diabetes and atrial fibrillation, were not predictors of EQ-5D utility in a multivariable setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that treatment strategies targeting flexible coping styles and decreasing dependency on caregivers may lead to significant gains in quality of life above and beyond treatment strategies that solely target disability. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6367764 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63677642019-02-15 The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke Dewilde, Sarah Annemans, Lieven Lloyd, Andrew Peeters, Andre Hemelsoet, Dimitri Vandermeeren, Yves Desfontaines, Philippe Brouns, Raf Vanhooren, Geert Cras, Patrick Michielsens, Boudewijn Redondo, Patricia Thijs, Vincent Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: To estimate the additional impact of coping and of being dependent on caregivers, over and above the large effects of disability on utility after ischemic stroke. METHODS: A total of 539 patients were recruited into an observational, retrospective study when returning for a check-up between 3 and 36 months after an ischemic stroke. Patients’ modified Rankin Scale (mRS), dependency on caregivers, the Brandtstädter and Renner Coping questionnaire (with summary scores: Tenacity of Goal Pursuit (TGP) and Flexible Goal Adjustment (FGA) coping styles), EQ-5D-3 L and co-morbidities were evaluated. RESULTS: In multivariable regression, greater disability (mRS) resulted in large utility losses, between 0.06 for mRS 1 to 0.65 for mRS 5 (p < 0.0001). Dependency on caregivers caused an additional dis-utility of 0.104 (p = 0.0006) which varied by mRS (0.044, 0.060, 0.083, 0.115, 0.150 and 0.173 for mRS 0–5). The effect of coping on utility varied by coping style, by the disability level of the patient and by his or her dependency on caregivers. FGA coping was associated with additional increases in utility (p < 0.0001) over and above the effect of disability and dependency, whereas TGA had no significant impact. FGA coping was associated with larger utility changes among more disabled patients (0.018 to 0.105 additional utility, for mRS 0 to mRS 5 respectively). Dependent patients had more to gain from FGA coping than patients who function independently of caregivers: utility gains were between 0.049 and 0.072 for moderate to high levels of FGA coping. In contrast, the same positive evolution in FGA coping resulted in 0.039 and 0.057 utility gain among independent patients. Finally, we found that important stroke risk factors and co-morbidities, such as diabetes and atrial fibrillation, were not predictors of EQ-5D utility in a multivariable setting. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that treatment strategies targeting flexible coping styles and decreasing dependency on caregivers may lead to significant gains in quality of life above and beyond treatment strategies that solely target disability. BioMed Central 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6367764/ /pubmed/30732619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1069-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Dewilde, Sarah Annemans, Lieven Lloyd, Andrew Peeters, Andre Hemelsoet, Dimitri Vandermeeren, Yves Desfontaines, Philippe Brouns, Raf Vanhooren, Geert Cras, Patrick Michielsens, Boudewijn Redondo, Patricia Thijs, Vincent The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
title | The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
title_full | The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
title_fullStr | The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
title_full_unstemmed | The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
title_short | The combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
title_sort | combined impact of dependency on caregivers, disability, and coping strategy on quality of life after ischemic stroke |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367764/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-018-1069-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewildesarah thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT annemanslieven thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT lloydandrew thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT peetersandre thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT hemelsoetdimitri thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT vandermeerenyves thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT desfontainesphilippe thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT brounsraf thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT vanhoorengeert thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT craspatrick thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT michielsensboudewijn thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT redondopatricia thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT thijsvincent thecombinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT dewildesarah combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT annemanslieven combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT lloydandrew combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT peetersandre combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT hemelsoetdimitri combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT vandermeerenyves combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT desfontainesphilippe combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT brounsraf combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT vanhoorengeert combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT craspatrick combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT michielsensboudewijn combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT redondopatricia combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke AT thijsvincent combinedimpactofdependencyoncaregiversdisabilityandcopingstrategyonqualityoflifeafterischemicstroke |