Cargando…

Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand

BACKGROUND: Front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition warning labels to identify potentially harmful foods/beverages have recently been considered in Singapore. The objective of this study was to pilot test two promising FOP warning labels intended to reduce purchases of products high in sugar to determine whet...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ang, Felicia Jia Ler, Agrawal, Sagun, Finkelstein, Eric A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6496-8
_version_ 1783393876688502784
author Ang, Felicia Jia Ler
Agrawal, Sagun
Finkelstein, Eric A.
author_facet Ang, Felicia Jia Ler
Agrawal, Sagun
Finkelstein, Eric A.
author_sort Ang, Felicia Jia Ler
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition warning labels to identify potentially harmful foods/beverages have recently been considered in Singapore. The objective of this study was to pilot test two promising FOP warning labels intended to reduce purchases of products high in sugar to determine whether a full scale trial testing one or both these labels using actual purchases is warranted. METHODS: Five hundred twelve participants ≥21 years old and residing in Singapore completed all study elements online via the NUSMart Online Grocery Store study website. The study was designed as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) where consumers were randomized and asked to hypothetically shop in one of three versions of an online grocery store; 1) no FOP label (control), 2) a graphical high-in-sugar label shaped like a stop sign, or 3) a text-based warning label. The proportion of labelled products purchased (primary outcome) and all secondary measures of diet quality were calculated using participants’ orders. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression was used to compare purchasing behavior across the three study arms. RESULTS: The proportion of high-in-sugar products selected (i.e., those targeted for labelling) was largest in the no label control arm at 20%. The proportion was a non-statistically significant 2 percentage points lower (P = 0.146) for the high-in-sugar stop-sign label arm and 4 percentage points lower (P < 0.05) in the warning label with deterrent text arm. We could not reject the hypothesis of equal effectiveness of the two warning labels (P = 0.231). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the two health warning labels have potential to reduce demand for high-in-sugar products in Singapore. Future studies should test the influence of these labels using actual purchases in efforts to identify whether either labelling strategy should be considered for adoption in the local setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The American Economic Association’s registry for randomized controlled trials; AEARCTR-0003800. Registered 18 January 2019. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6496-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63678072019-02-15 Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand Ang, Felicia Jia Ler Agrawal, Sagun Finkelstein, Eric A. BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Front-of-pack (FOP) nutrition warning labels to identify potentially harmful foods/beverages have recently been considered in Singapore. The objective of this study was to pilot test two promising FOP warning labels intended to reduce purchases of products high in sugar to determine whether a full scale trial testing one or both these labels using actual purchases is warranted. METHODS: Five hundred twelve participants ≥21 years old and residing in Singapore completed all study elements online via the NUSMart Online Grocery Store study website. The study was designed as a Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) where consumers were randomized and asked to hypothetically shop in one of three versions of an online grocery store; 1) no FOP label (control), 2) a graphical high-in-sugar label shaped like a stop sign, or 3) a text-based warning label. The proportion of labelled products purchased (primary outcome) and all secondary measures of diet quality were calculated using participants’ orders. Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression was used to compare purchasing behavior across the three study arms. RESULTS: The proportion of high-in-sugar products selected (i.e., those targeted for labelling) was largest in the no label control arm at 20%. The proportion was a non-statistically significant 2 percentage points lower (P = 0.146) for the high-in-sugar stop-sign label arm and 4 percentage points lower (P < 0.05) in the warning label with deterrent text arm. We could not reject the hypothesis of equal effectiveness of the two warning labels (P = 0.231). CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that the two health warning labels have potential to reduce demand for high-in-sugar products in Singapore. Future studies should test the influence of these labels using actual purchases in efforts to identify whether either labelling strategy should be considered for adoption in the local setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The American Economic Association’s registry for randomized controlled trials; AEARCTR-0003800. Registered 18 January 2019. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12889-019-6496-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6367807/ /pubmed/30732609 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6496-8 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ang, Felicia Jia Ler
Agrawal, Sagun
Finkelstein, Eric A.
Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
title Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
title_full Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
title_fullStr Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
title_full_unstemmed Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
title_short Pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
title_sort pilot randomized controlled trial testing the influence of front-of-pack sugar warning labels on food demand
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732609
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6496-8
work_keys_str_mv AT angfeliciajialer pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialtestingtheinfluenceoffrontofpacksugarwarninglabelsonfooddemand
AT agrawalsagun pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialtestingtheinfluenceoffrontofpacksugarwarninglabelsonfooddemand
AT finkelsteinerica pilotrandomizedcontrolledtrialtestingtheinfluenceoffrontofpacksugarwarninglabelsonfooddemand