Cargando…

Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We reported the validation of the 18-item version of the ‘Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation (IPREA)’ questionnaire that includes 2 new items exploring feeling depressed and shortness of breath during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. METHODS: The validation process was int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumstarck, Karine, Boucekine, Mohamed, Estagnasie, Philippe, Geantot, Marie-Agnès, Berric, Audrey, Simon, Georges, Floccard, Bernard, Signouret, Thomas, Fromentin, Mélanie, Nyunga, Martine, Sossou, Achille, Venot, Marion, Robert, René, Follin, Arnaud, Audibert, Juliette, Renault, Anne, Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté, Collange, Olivier, Levrat, Quentin, Villard, Isabelle, Thevenin, Didier, Pottecher, Julien, Patrigeon, René-Gilles, Revel, Nathalie, Vigne, Coralie, Azoulay, Elie, Mimoz, Olivier, Auquier, Pascal, Kalfon, Pierre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5
_version_ 1783393882345570304
author Baumstarck, Karine
Boucekine, Mohamed
Estagnasie, Philippe
Geantot, Marie-Agnès
Berric, Audrey
Simon, Georges
Floccard, Bernard
Signouret, Thomas
Fromentin, Mélanie
Nyunga, Martine
Sossou, Achille
Venot, Marion
Robert, René
Follin, Arnaud
Audibert, Juliette
Renault, Anne
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté
Collange, Olivier
Levrat, Quentin
Villard, Isabelle
Thevenin, Didier
Pottecher, Julien
Patrigeon, René-Gilles
Revel, Nathalie
Vigne, Coralie
Azoulay, Elie
Mimoz, Olivier
Auquier, Pascal
Kalfon, Pierre
author_facet Baumstarck, Karine
Boucekine, Mohamed
Estagnasie, Philippe
Geantot, Marie-Agnès
Berric, Audrey
Simon, Georges
Floccard, Bernard
Signouret, Thomas
Fromentin, Mélanie
Nyunga, Martine
Sossou, Achille
Venot, Marion
Robert, René
Follin, Arnaud
Audibert, Juliette
Renault, Anne
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté
Collange, Olivier
Levrat, Quentin
Villard, Isabelle
Thevenin, Didier
Pottecher, Julien
Patrigeon, René-Gilles
Revel, Nathalie
Vigne, Coralie
Azoulay, Elie
Mimoz, Olivier
Auquier, Pascal
Kalfon, Pierre
author_sort Baumstarck, Karine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We reported the validation of the 18-item version of the ‘Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation (IPREA)’ questionnaire that includes 2 new items exploring feeling depressed and shortness of breath during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. METHODS: The validation process was integrated in a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, two-parallel group study built to assess the effectiveness of a tailored multicomponent program for reducing self-perceived discomfort in the ICU. All patients aged 18 years or older who survived an ICU stay of 3 calendar days or more were eligible for inclusion. Data collection included demographics (sex, age), type of admission (medical and surgical), health status scores at admission (Knaus score and McCabe index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II), specific ICU therapeutics such as mechanical ventilation (MV), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), use of vasopressors, or renal replacement therapy (RRT), and ICU stay duration. RESULTS: A total of 994 patients were included. The initial structure of IPREA was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis showing satisfactory fit (RMSEA at 0.042, CFI at 0.912). No multidimensional structure was identified, allowing the calculation of an overall discomfort score. The three highest discomforts were sleep deprivation, thirst, and perfusion lines and other devices, and the 3 lowest discomforts were limited visiting hours, hunger, and isolation. The overall discomfort score of the 18-item version of IPREA did not differ between men and women. Higher age was significantly correlated with a lower overall discomfort score. While MV was not linked to self-reported discomfort, patients treated by NIV reported higher overall discomfort scores than patients not treated by NIV. CONCLUSION: The 18-item version of IPREA is easy to use and possesses satisfactory psychometric properties. The availability of a reliable and valid French questionnaire asking about patients’ self-perceived ICU discomforts enables feedback from the health care team to be incorporated in a continuous quality health care improvement strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov NCT02442934 (registration date: May 18, 2015, retrospectively registered).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367827
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63678272019-02-15 Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA Baumstarck, Karine Boucekine, Mohamed Estagnasie, Philippe Geantot, Marie-Agnès Berric, Audrey Simon, Georges Floccard, Bernard Signouret, Thomas Fromentin, Mélanie Nyunga, Martine Sossou, Achille Venot, Marion Robert, René Follin, Arnaud Audibert, Juliette Renault, Anne Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté Collange, Olivier Levrat, Quentin Villard, Isabelle Thevenin, Didier Pottecher, Julien Patrigeon, René-Gilles Revel, Nathalie Vigne, Coralie Azoulay, Elie Mimoz, Olivier Auquier, Pascal Kalfon, Pierre Health Qual Life Outcomes Short Report BACKGROUND AND AIMS: We reported the validation of the 18-item version of the ‘Inconforts des Patients de REAnimation (IPREA)’ questionnaire that includes 2 new items exploring feeling depressed and shortness of breath during an intensive care unit (ICU) stay. METHODS: The validation process was integrated in a multicenter, cluster-randomized, controlled, two-parallel group study built to assess the effectiveness of a tailored multicomponent program for reducing self-perceived discomfort in the ICU. All patients aged 18 years or older who survived an ICU stay of 3 calendar days or more were eligible for inclusion. Data collection included demographics (sex, age), type of admission (medical and surgical), health status scores at admission (Knaus score and McCabe index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II), specific ICU therapeutics such as mechanical ventilation (MV), noninvasive ventilation (NIV), use of vasopressors, or renal replacement therapy (RRT), and ICU stay duration. RESULTS: A total of 994 patients were included. The initial structure of IPREA was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis showing satisfactory fit (RMSEA at 0.042, CFI at 0.912). No multidimensional structure was identified, allowing the calculation of an overall discomfort score. The three highest discomforts were sleep deprivation, thirst, and perfusion lines and other devices, and the 3 lowest discomforts were limited visiting hours, hunger, and isolation. The overall discomfort score of the 18-item version of IPREA did not differ between men and women. Higher age was significantly correlated with a lower overall discomfort score. While MV was not linked to self-reported discomfort, patients treated by NIV reported higher overall discomfort scores than patients not treated by NIV. CONCLUSION: The 18-item version of IPREA is easy to use and possesses satisfactory psychometric properties. The availability of a reliable and valid French questionnaire asking about patients’ self-perceived ICU discomforts enables feedback from the health care team to be incorporated in a continuous quality health care improvement strategy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrial.gov NCT02442934 (registration date: May 18, 2015, retrospectively registered). BioMed Central 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6367827/ /pubmed/30732654 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Short Report
Baumstarck, Karine
Boucekine, Mohamed
Estagnasie, Philippe
Geantot, Marie-Agnès
Berric, Audrey
Simon, Georges
Floccard, Bernard
Signouret, Thomas
Fromentin, Mélanie
Nyunga, Martine
Sossou, Achille
Venot, Marion
Robert, René
Follin, Arnaud
Audibert, Juliette
Renault, Anne
Garrouste-Orgeas, Maïté
Collange, Olivier
Levrat, Quentin
Villard, Isabelle
Thevenin, Didier
Pottecher, Julien
Patrigeon, René-Gilles
Revel, Nathalie
Vigne, Coralie
Azoulay, Elie
Mimoz, Olivier
Auquier, Pascal
Kalfon, Pierre
Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
title Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
title_full Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
title_fullStr Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
title_short Assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: Validation of the 18-item version of the IPREA
title_sort assessment of patients’ self-perceived intensive care unit discomforts: validation of the 18-item version of the iprea
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367827/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732654
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1101-5
work_keys_str_mv AT baumstarckkarine assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT boucekinemohamed assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT estagnasiephilippe assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT geantotmarieagnes assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT berricaudrey assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT simongeorges assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT floccardbernard assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT signouretthomas assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT fromentinmelanie assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT nyungamartine assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT sossouachille assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT venotmarion assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT robertrene assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT follinarnaud assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT audibertjuliette assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT renaultanne assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT garrousteorgeasmaite assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT collangeolivier assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT levratquentin assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT villardisabelle assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT thevenindidier assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT pottecherjulien assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT patrigeonrenegilles assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT revelnathalie assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT vignecoralie assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT azoulayelie assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT mimozolivier assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT auquierpascal assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT kalfonpierre assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea
AT assessmentofpatientsselfperceivedintensivecareunitdiscomfortsvalidationofthe18itemversionoftheiprea