Cargando…

Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in sensor technologies have promoted the use of consumer-based accelerometers such as Fitbit Flex in epidemiological and clinical research; however, the validity of the Fitbit Flex in measuring sedentary behavior (SED) and physical activity (PA) has not been fully determi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Redenius, Nicklaus, Kim, Youngwon, Byun, Wonwoo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0668-1
_version_ 1783393884524511232
author Redenius, Nicklaus
Kim, Youngwon
Byun, Wonwoo
author_facet Redenius, Nicklaus
Kim, Youngwon
Byun, Wonwoo
author_sort Redenius, Nicklaus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Recent advances in sensor technologies have promoted the use of consumer-based accelerometers such as Fitbit Flex in epidemiological and clinical research; however, the validity of the Fitbit Flex in measuring sedentary behavior (SED) and physical activity (PA) has not been fully determined against previously validated research-grade accelerometers such as ActiGraph GT3X+. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the Fitbit Flex against ActiGraph GT3X+ in a free-living condition. METHODS: A total of 65 participants (age: M = 42, SD = 14 years, female: 72%) each wore a Fitbit Flex and GT3X+ for seven consecutive days. After excluding sleep and non-wear time, time spent (min/day) in SED and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) were estimated using various cut-points for GT3X+ and brand-specific algorithms for Fitbit, respectively. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA and mean absolute percent errors (MAPE) served to examine differences and measurement errors in SED and MVPA estimates between Fitbit Flex and GT3X+, respectively. Pearson and Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman (BA) plots were used to evaluate the association and potential systematic bias between Fitbit Flex and GT3X+. PROC MIXED procedure in SAS was used to examine the equivalence (i.e., the 90% confidence interval with ±10% equivalence zone) between the devices. RESULTS: Fitbit Flex produced similar SED and low MAPE (mean difference [MD] = 37 min/day, P = .21, MAPE = 6.8%), but significantly higher MVPA and relatively large MAPE (MD = 59–77 min/day, P < .0001, MAPE = 56.6–74.3%) compared with the estimates from GT3X+ using three different cut-points. The correlations between Fitbit Flex and GT3X+ were consistently higher for SED (r = 0.90, ρ = 0.86, P < .01), but weaker for MVPA (r = 0.65–0.76, ρ = 0.69–0.79, P < .01). BA plots revealed that there is no apparent bias in estimating SED. CONCLUSION: In comparison with the GT3X+ accelerometer, the Fitbit Flex provided comparatively accurate estimates of SED, but the Fitbit Flex overestimated MVPA under free-living conditions. Future investigations using the Fitbit Flex should be aware of present findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63678362019-02-15 Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity Redenius, Nicklaus Kim, Youngwon Byun, Wonwoo BMC Med Res Methodol Research Article BACKGROUND: Recent advances in sensor technologies have promoted the use of consumer-based accelerometers such as Fitbit Flex in epidemiological and clinical research; however, the validity of the Fitbit Flex in measuring sedentary behavior (SED) and physical activity (PA) has not been fully determined against previously validated research-grade accelerometers such as ActiGraph GT3X+. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to examine the concurrent validity of the Fitbit Flex against ActiGraph GT3X+ in a free-living condition. METHODS: A total of 65 participants (age: M = 42, SD = 14 years, female: 72%) each wore a Fitbit Flex and GT3X+ for seven consecutive days. After excluding sleep and non-wear time, time spent (min/day) in SED and moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) were estimated using various cut-points for GT3X+ and brand-specific algorithms for Fitbit, respectively. Repeated measures one-way ANOVA and mean absolute percent errors (MAPE) served to examine differences and measurement errors in SED and MVPA estimates between Fitbit Flex and GT3X+, respectively. Pearson and Spearman correlations and Bland-Altman (BA) plots were used to evaluate the association and potential systematic bias between Fitbit Flex and GT3X+. PROC MIXED procedure in SAS was used to examine the equivalence (i.e., the 90% confidence interval with ±10% equivalence zone) between the devices. RESULTS: Fitbit Flex produced similar SED and low MAPE (mean difference [MD] = 37 min/day, P = .21, MAPE = 6.8%), but significantly higher MVPA and relatively large MAPE (MD = 59–77 min/day, P < .0001, MAPE = 56.6–74.3%) compared with the estimates from GT3X+ using three different cut-points. The correlations between Fitbit Flex and GT3X+ were consistently higher for SED (r = 0.90, ρ = 0.86, P < .01), but weaker for MVPA (r = 0.65–0.76, ρ = 0.69–0.79, P < .01). BA plots revealed that there is no apparent bias in estimating SED. CONCLUSION: In comparison with the GT3X+ accelerometer, the Fitbit Flex provided comparatively accurate estimates of SED, but the Fitbit Flex overestimated MVPA under free-living conditions. Future investigations using the Fitbit Flex should be aware of present findings. BioMed Central 2019-02-07 /pmc/articles/PMC6367836/ /pubmed/30732582 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0668-1 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Redenius, Nicklaus
Kim, Youngwon
Byun, Wonwoo
Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
title Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
title_full Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
title_fullStr Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
title_full_unstemmed Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
title_short Concurrent validity of the Fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
title_sort concurrent validity of the fitbit for assessing sedentary behavior and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30732582
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12874-019-0668-1
work_keys_str_mv AT redeniusnicklaus concurrentvalidityofthefitbitforassessingsedentarybehaviorandmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivity
AT kimyoungwon concurrentvalidityofthefitbitforassessingsedentarybehaviorandmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivity
AT byunwonwoo concurrentvalidityofthefitbitforassessingsedentarybehaviorandmoderatetovigorousphysicalactivity