Cargando…

Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period. SETTING: This study was conducted in Putrajaya...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghazali, Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan, Jamil, Siti Amira, Sharin, Ili Abdullah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783585
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_25_18
_version_ 1783393893891440640
author Ghazali, Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan
Jamil, Siti Amira
Sharin, Ili Abdullah
author_facet Ghazali, Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan
Jamil, Siti Amira
Sharin, Ili Abdullah
author_sort Ghazali, Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period. SETTING: This study was conducted in Putrajaya Hospital, a district hospital with consultant care level in obstetrics and gynecology. SAMPLE: Forty women presented with confirmed cases of endometrial cancer based on histopathology result and underwent extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy between January 2010 and December 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient outcomes were compared between 26 women who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and 14 women who underwent open laparotomy extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Data were collected using electronic medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative outcomes, operative time, total intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, and total days of postoperative stay were obtained. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group with mean 262.50 ± 47.87 and laparotomy group with mean 381.82 ± 138.33, 95% confidence interval, P < 0.05. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group, where the mean postoperative stay in laparoscopic group was 2.5 ± 2.0 days and laparotomy 5.0 ± 3.6 days. There was no significant difference in mean operative time (the mean operative time: 256 ± 76.40 for laparotomy and 288.75 ± 43.66 for the laparoscopic approach). More number of lymph nodes were harvested laparoscopically (29.75 ± 16.59) than laparotomy (23.0 ± 12.62); however, this was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery had significant lesser blood loss and it is comparable to laparotomy in the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Experienced surgeon will be able to perform hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy as equally good to laparotomy with adequate tumor excision and complete staging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367911
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63679112019-02-19 Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience Ghazali, Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan Jamil, Siti Amira Sharin, Ili Abdullah Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of laparoscopy compared with laparotomy in extrafascial hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of small cases over a 5-year period. SETTING: This study was conducted in Putrajaya Hospital, a district hospital with consultant care level in obstetrics and gynecology. SAMPLE: Forty women presented with confirmed cases of endometrial cancer based on histopathology result and underwent extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy between January 2010 and December 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patient outcomes were compared between 26 women who underwent laparoscopic total hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy and 14 women who underwent open laparotomy extrafascial hysterectomy with or without lymphadenectomy. Data were collected using electronic medical records. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Postoperative outcomes, operative time, total intraoperative blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, and total days of postoperative stay were obtained. RESULTS: There was a significant reduction in operative blood loss in the laparoscopic group with mean 262.50 ± 47.87 and laparotomy group with mean 381.82 ± 138.33, 95% confidence interval, P < 0.05. Postoperative hospital stay was also significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group, where the mean postoperative stay in laparoscopic group was 2.5 ± 2.0 days and laparotomy 5.0 ± 3.6 days. There was no significant difference in mean operative time (the mean operative time: 256 ± 76.40 for laparotomy and 288.75 ± 43.66 for the laparoscopic approach). More number of lymph nodes were harvested laparoscopically (29.75 ± 16.59) than laparotomy (23.0 ± 12.62); however, this was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic surgery had significant lesser blood loss and it is comparable to laparotomy in the surgical management of endometrial cancer. Experienced surgeon will be able to perform hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy as equally good to laparotomy with adequate tumor excision and complete staging. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2019 2019-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC6367911/ /pubmed/30783585 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_25_18 Text en Copyright: © 2019 Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghazali, Wan Ahmad Hazim Wan
Jamil, Siti Amira
Sharin, Ili Abdullah
Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience
title Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience
title_full Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience
title_fullStr Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience
title_full_unstemmed Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience
title_short Laparoscopic versus Laparotomy: Staging Surgery for Endometrial Cancer – Malaysia's Early Experience
title_sort laparoscopic versus laparotomy: staging surgery for endometrial cancer – malaysia's early experience
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367911/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30783585
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_25_18
work_keys_str_mv AT ghazaliwanahmadhazimwan laparoscopicversuslaparotomystagingsurgeryforendometrialcancermalaysiasearlyexperience
AT jamilsitiamira laparoscopicversuslaparotomystagingsurgeryforendometrialcancermalaysiasearlyexperience
AT shariniliabdullah laparoscopicversuslaparotomystagingsurgeryforendometrialcancermalaysiasearlyexperience