Cargando…
Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associated factors for personal, work-related and patient/client-related burnout in clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in academic medicine. DESIGN: Prevalence survey using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. SETTING: Mid-size academic health ce...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023506 |
_version_ | 1783393906327552000 |
---|---|
author | Messias, Erick Gathright, Molly M Freeman, Emily S Flynn, Victoria Atkinson, Timothy Thrush, Carol R Clardy, James A Thapa, Purushottam |
author_facet | Messias, Erick Gathright, Molly M Freeman, Emily S Flynn, Victoria Atkinson, Timothy Thrush, Carol R Clardy, James A Thapa, Purushottam |
author_sort | Messias, Erick |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associated factors for personal, work-related and patient/client-related burnout in clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in academic medicine. DESIGN: Prevalence survey using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. SETTING: Mid-size academic health centre. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical providers (n=6489) and biomedical scientists (n=248) were invited to complete the survey. 1646 completed responses (response rate 24.4%) were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence estimates and adjusted ORs (AOR) were stratified for gender, age and professional category. RESULTS: Type of burnout varies across professional categories, with significant differences between clinicians and scientists. The prevalence of personal burnout was 52.7% (95%CI 50% to 55%), work-related burnout 47.5% (95%CI 45% to 49%) and patient/client-related burnout 20.3% (95%CI 18% to 22%). The prevalence of personal and work-related burnout was higher among women, while those aged 20–30 had a higher prevalence of all three burnout categories. Overall, clinical professionals had higher personal and work-related burnout, while biomedical scientists had higher client-related burnout. Accounting for the effects of gender and age, a significantly higher risk for personal burnout was found for physicians (AOR 1.64; 95%CI 1.3 to 2.1) and nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.03 to 2.2). Significantly higher odds of work-related burnout were found for nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.2 to 1.9) and residents (AOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.04 to 3.6). Basic scientists (AOR 10.0; 95%CI 5.7 to 17.6), physicians (AOR 2.8; 95%CI 1.9 to 4.1) and nurses (AOR 2.1; 95%CI 1.3 to 3.5) had higher odds of patient/client-related burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Types of burnout are unevenly distributed in academic medical centres. Physicians have higher risk of personal and patient/client-related burnout, residents have higher risk of work-related burnout, basic scientists are at higher risk of client-related burnout and nurses have higher odds of all three types of burnout. Interventions addressing the problem of burnout in clinical environments may be inadequate to support biomedical scientists. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6367953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63679532019-03-10 Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey Messias, Erick Gathright, Molly M Freeman, Emily S Flynn, Victoria Atkinson, Timothy Thrush, Carol R Clardy, James A Thapa, Purushottam BMJ Open Medical Education and Training OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and associated factors for personal, work-related and patient/client-related burnout in clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in academic medicine. DESIGN: Prevalence survey using the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory. SETTING: Mid-size academic health centre. PARTICIPANTS: Clinical providers (n=6489) and biomedical scientists (n=248) were invited to complete the survey. 1646 completed responses (response rate 24.4%) were analysed. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence estimates and adjusted ORs (AOR) were stratified for gender, age and professional category. RESULTS: Type of burnout varies across professional categories, with significant differences between clinicians and scientists. The prevalence of personal burnout was 52.7% (95%CI 50% to 55%), work-related burnout 47.5% (95%CI 45% to 49%) and patient/client-related burnout 20.3% (95%CI 18% to 22%). The prevalence of personal and work-related burnout was higher among women, while those aged 20–30 had a higher prevalence of all three burnout categories. Overall, clinical professionals had higher personal and work-related burnout, while biomedical scientists had higher client-related burnout. Accounting for the effects of gender and age, a significantly higher risk for personal burnout was found for physicians (AOR 1.64; 95%CI 1.3 to 2.1) and nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.03 to 2.2). Significantly higher odds of work-related burnout were found for nurses (AOR 1.5; 95%CI 1.2 to 1.9) and residents (AOR 1.9; 95%CI 1.04 to 3.6). Basic scientists (AOR 10.0; 95%CI 5.7 to 17.6), physicians (AOR 2.8; 95%CI 1.9 to 4.1) and nurses (AOR 2.1; 95%CI 1.3 to 3.5) had higher odds of patient/client-related burnout. CONCLUSIONS: Types of burnout are unevenly distributed in academic medical centres. Physicians have higher risk of personal and patient/client-related burnout, residents have higher risk of work-related burnout, basic scientists are at higher risk of client-related burnout and nurses have higher odds of all three types of burnout. Interventions addressing the problem of burnout in clinical environments may be inadequate to support biomedical scientists. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6367953/ /pubmed/30782882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023506 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Education and Training Messias, Erick Gathright, Molly M Freeman, Emily S Flynn, Victoria Atkinson, Timothy Thrush, Carol R Clardy, James A Thapa, Purushottam Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
title | Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
title_full | Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
title_short | Differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | differences in burnout prevalence between clinical professionals and biomedical scientists in an academic medical centre: a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Medical Education and Training |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023506 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messiaserick differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT gathrightmollym differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT freemanemilys differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT flynnvictoria differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT atkinsontimothy differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT thrushcarolr differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT clardyjamesa differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey AT thapapurushottam differencesinburnoutprevalencebetweenclinicalprofessionalsandbiomedicalscientistsinanacademicmedicalcentreacrosssectionalsurvey |