Cargando…

Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum

OBJECTIVES: To explore the added value of hospital-registry data on invasive epithelial ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers. DESIGN: Historic cohort analyses. METHODS: Unadjusted and adjusted regression. SETTING: Major South Australian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 1596 women (1984–2015 diagnoses). RES...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roder, David, Davy, Margaret, Selva-Nayagam, Sid, Paramasivam, Sellvakumaran, Adams, Jacqui, Keefe, Dorothy, Miller, Caroline, Powell, Kate, Fusco, Kellie, Buranyi-Trevarton, Dianne, Oehler, Martin K
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024036
_version_ 1783393908588281856
author Roder, David
Davy, Margaret
Selva-Nayagam, Sid
Paramasivam, Sellvakumaran
Adams, Jacqui
Keefe, Dorothy
Miller, Caroline
Powell, Kate
Fusco, Kellie
Buranyi-Trevarton, Dianne
Oehler, Martin K
author_facet Roder, David
Davy, Margaret
Selva-Nayagam, Sid
Paramasivam, Sellvakumaran
Adams, Jacqui
Keefe, Dorothy
Miller, Caroline
Powell, Kate
Fusco, Kellie
Buranyi-Trevarton, Dianne
Oehler, Martin K
author_sort Roder, David
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To explore the added value of hospital-registry data on invasive epithelial ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers. DESIGN: Historic cohort analyses. METHODS: Unadjusted and adjusted regression. SETTING: Major South Australian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 1596 women (1984–2015 diagnoses). RESULTS: 5-Year and 10-year survival was 48% and 41%, respectively, equivalent to relative survival for Australia and the USA. After adjusting for age, clinical and geographic factors, risk of ovarian cancer death was 25% lower in 2010–2015 than 1984–1989. Women generally had surgical treatment (87%) in their first round of care. This was more common for younger patients (adjusted OR (95% CIs) 0.17 (0.04 to 0.65) for 80+ vs <40 years) and earlier International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (adjusted OR 0.48 (0.13 to 1.78) for stage IIIB/C and 0.13 (0.04 to 0.45) for stage IV vs stage IA). Most (74%) had systemic therapy, which was more common for advanced stages (adjusted ORs >15.0 for stages III and IV vs stage IA). Few (9%) had radiotherapy. Women generally had systemic therapy (74%), without difference by service accessibility and socioeconomic disadvantage, suggesting equity. However, surgery was less common for residents of the most compared with least remote areas (adjusted OR 0.49 (0.24 to 0.99)); and more common prior to adjustment in the highest versus lowest socioeconomic category (unadjusted OR 1.55 (1.01 to 2.39)), but this elevation did not apply after adjustment (adjusted OR 0.19 (0.63 to 2.25)), with the difference largely explained by stage. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-registry data add value for assessing local service delivery. Equivalent survival to Australia-wide and USA survival, and temporal gains after adjusting for stage and other patient characteristics are reassuring. Survival gains may reflect therapeutic benefits of more extensive surgery and improved chemotherapy regimens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6367964
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63679642019-03-10 Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum Roder, David Davy, Margaret Selva-Nayagam, Sid Paramasivam, Sellvakumaran Adams, Jacqui Keefe, Dorothy Miller, Caroline Powell, Kate Fusco, Kellie Buranyi-Trevarton, Dianne Oehler, Martin K BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: To explore the added value of hospital-registry data on invasive epithelial ovarian, tubal and peritoneal cancers. DESIGN: Historic cohort analyses. METHODS: Unadjusted and adjusted regression. SETTING: Major South Australian hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: 1596 women (1984–2015 diagnoses). RESULTS: 5-Year and 10-year survival was 48% and 41%, respectively, equivalent to relative survival for Australia and the USA. After adjusting for age, clinical and geographic factors, risk of ovarian cancer death was 25% lower in 2010–2015 than 1984–1989. Women generally had surgical treatment (87%) in their first round of care. This was more common for younger patients (adjusted OR (95% CIs) 0.17 (0.04 to 0.65) for 80+ vs <40 years) and earlier International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stages (adjusted OR 0.48 (0.13 to 1.78) for stage IIIB/C and 0.13 (0.04 to 0.45) for stage IV vs stage IA). Most (74%) had systemic therapy, which was more common for advanced stages (adjusted ORs >15.0 for stages III and IV vs stage IA). Few (9%) had radiotherapy. Women generally had systemic therapy (74%), without difference by service accessibility and socioeconomic disadvantage, suggesting equity. However, surgery was less common for residents of the most compared with least remote areas (adjusted OR 0.49 (0.24 to 0.99)); and more common prior to adjustment in the highest versus lowest socioeconomic category (unadjusted OR 1.55 (1.01 to 2.39)), but this elevation did not apply after adjustment (adjusted OR 0.19 (0.63 to 2.25)), with the difference largely explained by stage. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital-registry data add value for assessing local service delivery. Equivalent survival to Australia-wide and USA survival, and temporal gains after adjusting for stage and other patient characteristics are reassuring. Survival gains may reflect therapeutic benefits of more extensive surgery and improved chemotherapy regimens. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6367964/ /pubmed/30782891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024036 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Public Health
Roder, David
Davy, Margaret
Selva-Nayagam, Sid
Paramasivam, Sellvakumaran
Adams, Jacqui
Keefe, Dorothy
Miller, Caroline
Powell, Kate
Fusco, Kellie
Buranyi-Trevarton, Dianne
Oehler, Martin K
Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
title Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
title_full Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
title_fullStr Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
title_short Exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
title_sort exploring the added value of hospital-registry data for showing local service outcomes: cancers of the ovary, fallopian tube and peritoneum
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367964/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024036
work_keys_str_mv AT roderdavid exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT davymargaret exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT selvanayagamsid exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT paramasivamsellvakumaran exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT adamsjacqui exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT keefedorothy exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT millercaroline exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT powellkate exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT fuscokellie exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT buranyitrevartondianne exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum
AT oehlermartink exploringtheaddedvalueofhospitalregistrydataforshowinglocalserviceoutcomescancersoftheovaryfallopiantubeandperitoneum