Cargando…
Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the rationalisation beliefs endorsed by Chinese male smokers and to examine the association between rationalisation and the intention to quit. SETTING: Questionnaires were conducted among male smokers in three cities (Shanghai, Nanning and Mudanjiang) which represent...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025285 |
_version_ | 1783393917855596544 |
---|---|
author | Huang, Xinyuan Fu, Wenjie Zhang, Haiying Li, Hong Li, Xiaoxia Yang, Yong Wang, Fan Gao, Junling Zheng, Pinpin Fu, Hua Chapman, Simon Ding, Ding |
author_facet | Huang, Xinyuan Fu, Wenjie Zhang, Haiying Li, Hong Li, Xiaoxia Yang, Yong Wang, Fan Gao, Junling Zheng, Pinpin Fu, Hua Chapman, Simon Ding, Ding |
author_sort | Huang, Xinyuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the rationalisation beliefs endorsed by Chinese male smokers and to examine the association between rationalisation and the intention to quit. SETTING: Questionnaires were conducted among male smokers in three cities (Shanghai, Nanning and Mudanjiang) which represent different geographical locations, economic development levels and legislative status of tobacco control in China. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: It was a multicentre cross-sectional survey involved a total of 3710 male smokers over 18 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were intention to quit, smoking rationalisation scores and sub scores in six dimensions. Smoking rationalisation was assessed using a newly developed Chinese rationalisation scale. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between rationalisation and intention to quit. RESULTS: On average, smokers scored 3.3 out of 5 on the smoking rationalisation scale. With a one point increase in total rationalisation scale, the odds for intention to quit in the next 6 months decreased by 48% (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.61; p<0.001). Separate logistic regressions for six subscales of rationalisation shown consistent inverse associations with intention to quit (all p values <0.001). Believing that smoking was socially acceptable was the strongest predictor (OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.71; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rationalisation beliefs could be important barriers to smoking cessation. Some beliefs have stronger association with quit intention than others. Eroding rationalisation beliefs endorsed by smokers is a potential strategy for smoking cessation intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6368028 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63680282019-03-10 Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit Huang, Xinyuan Fu, Wenjie Zhang, Haiying Li, Hong Li, Xiaoxia Yang, Yong Wang, Fan Gao, Junling Zheng, Pinpin Fu, Hua Chapman, Simon Ding, Ding BMJ Open Smoking and Tobacco OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the rationalisation beliefs endorsed by Chinese male smokers and to examine the association between rationalisation and the intention to quit. SETTING: Questionnaires were conducted among male smokers in three cities (Shanghai, Nanning and Mudanjiang) which represent different geographical locations, economic development levels and legislative status of tobacco control in China. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: It was a multicentre cross-sectional survey involved a total of 3710 male smokers over 18 years. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes were intention to quit, smoking rationalisation scores and sub scores in six dimensions. Smoking rationalisation was assessed using a newly developed Chinese rationalisation scale. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to examine the relationship between rationalisation and intention to quit. RESULTS: On average, smokers scored 3.3 out of 5 on the smoking rationalisation scale. With a one point increase in total rationalisation scale, the odds for intention to quit in the next 6 months decreased by 48% (OR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.61; p<0.001). Separate logistic regressions for six subscales of rationalisation shown consistent inverse associations with intention to quit (all p values <0.001). Believing that smoking was socially acceptable was the strongest predictor (OR=0.62, 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.71; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Rationalisation beliefs could be important barriers to smoking cessation. Some beliefs have stronger association with quit intention than others. Eroding rationalisation beliefs endorsed by smokers is a potential strategy for smoking cessation intervention. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6368028/ /pubmed/30782929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025285 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Smoking and Tobacco Huang, Xinyuan Fu, Wenjie Zhang, Haiying Li, Hong Li, Xiaoxia Yang, Yong Wang, Fan Gao, Junling Zheng, Pinpin Fu, Hua Chapman, Simon Ding, Ding Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
title | Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
title_full | Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
title_fullStr | Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
title_full_unstemmed | Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
title_short | Why are male Chinese smokers unwilling to quit? A multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
title_sort | why are male chinese smokers unwilling to quit? a multicentre cross-sectional study on smoking rationalisation and intention to quit |
topic | Smoking and Tobacco |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368028/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782929 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025285 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT huangxinyuan whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT fuwenjie whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT zhanghaiying whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT lihong whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT lixiaoxia whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT yangyong whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT wangfan whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT gaojunling whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT zhengpinpin whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT fuhua whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT chapmansimon whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit AT dingding whyaremalechinesesmokersunwillingtoquitamulticentrecrosssectionalstudyonsmokingrationalisationandintentiontoquit |