Cargando…

Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media

OBJECTIVE: To characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the am...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maggio, Lauren A, Ratcliff, Chelsea L, Krakow, Melinda, Moorhead, Laura L, Enkhbayar, Asura, Alperin, Juan Pablo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783
_version_ 1783393936062021632
author Maggio, Lauren A
Ratcliff, Chelsea L
Krakow, Melinda
Moorhead, Laura L
Enkhbayar, Asura
Alperin, Juan Pablo
author_facet Maggio, Lauren A
Ratcliff, Chelsea L
Krakow, Melinda
Moorhead, Laura L
Enkhbayar, Asura
Alperin, Juan Pablo
author_sort Maggio, Lauren A
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The United States. PARTICIPANTS: The subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric. RESULTS: 16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368156
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63681562019-03-10 Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media Maggio, Lauren A Ratcliff, Chelsea L Krakow, Melinda Moorhead, Laura L Enkhbayar, Asura Alperin, Juan Pablo BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review OBJECTIVE: To characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The United States. PARTICIPANTS: The subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric. RESULTS: 16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6368156/ /pubmed/30782941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Medical Publishing and Peer Review
Maggio, Lauren A
Ratcliff, Chelsea L
Krakow, Melinda
Moorhead, Laura L
Enkhbayar, Asura
Alperin, Juan Pablo
Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
title Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
title_full Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
title_fullStr Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
title_full_unstemmed Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
title_short Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
title_sort making headlines: an analysis of us government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
topic Medical Publishing and Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368156/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782941
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783
work_keys_str_mv AT maggiolaurena makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia
AT ratcliffchelseal makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia
AT krakowmelinda makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia
AT moorheadlaural makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia
AT enkhbayarasura makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia
AT alperinjuanpablo makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia