Cargando…
Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media
OBJECTIVE: To characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the am...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783 |
_version_ | 1783393936062021632 |
---|---|
author | Maggio, Lauren A Ratcliff, Chelsea L Krakow, Melinda Moorhead, Laura L Enkhbayar, Asura Alperin, Juan Pablo |
author_facet | Maggio, Lauren A Ratcliff, Chelsea L Krakow, Melinda Moorhead, Laura L Enkhbayar, Asura Alperin, Juan Pablo |
author_sort | Maggio, Lauren A |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The United States. PARTICIPANTS: The subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric. RESULTS: 16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6368156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63681562019-03-10 Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media Maggio, Lauren A Ratcliff, Chelsea L Krakow, Melinda Moorhead, Laura L Enkhbayar, Asura Alperin, Juan Pablo BMJ Open Medical Publishing and Peer Review OBJECTIVE: To characterise how online media coverage of journal articles on cancer funded by the US government varies by cancer type and stage of the cancer control continuum and to compare the disease prevalence rates with the amount of funded research published for each cancer type and with the amount of media attention each receives. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study. SETTING: The United States. PARTICIPANTS: The subject of analysis was 11 436 journal articles on cancer funded by the US government published in 2016. These articles were identified via PubMed and characterised as receiving online media attention based on data provided by Altmetric. RESULTS: 16.8% (n=1925) of articles published on US government-funded research were covered in the media. Published journal articles addressed all common cancers. Frequency of journal articles differed substantially across the common cancers, with breast cancer (n=1284), lung cancer (n=630) and prostate cancer (n=586) being the subject of the most journal articles. Roughly one-fifth to one-fourth of journal articles within each cancer category received online media attention. Media mentions were disproportionate to actual burden of each cancer type (ie, incidence and mortality), with breast cancer articles receiving the most media mentions. Scientific articles also covered the stages of the cancer continuum to varying degrees. Across the 13 most common cancer types, 4.4% (n=206) of articles focused on prevention and control, 11.7% (n=550) on diagnosis and 10.7% (n=502) on therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Findings revealed a mismatch between prevalent cancers and cancers highlighted in online media. Further, journal articles on cancer control and prevention received less media attention than other cancer continuum stages. Media mentions were not proportional to actual public cancer burden nor volume of scientific publications in each cancer category. Results highlight a need for continued research on the role of media, especially online media, in research dissemination. BMJ Publishing Group 2019-02-03 /pmc/articles/PMC6368156/ /pubmed/30782941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Medical Publishing and Peer Review Maggio, Lauren A Ratcliff, Chelsea L Krakow, Melinda Moorhead, Laura L Enkhbayar, Asura Alperin, Juan Pablo Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
title | Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
title_full | Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
title_fullStr | Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
title_full_unstemmed | Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
title_short | Making headlines: an analysis of US government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
title_sort | making headlines: an analysis of us government-funded cancer research mentioned in online media |
topic | Medical Publishing and Peer Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30782941 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025783 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT maggiolaurena makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia AT ratcliffchelseal makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia AT krakowmelinda makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia AT moorheadlaural makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia AT enkhbayarasura makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia AT alperinjuanpablo makingheadlinesananalysisofusgovernmentfundedcancerresearchmentionedinonlinemedia |