Cargando…

Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View

Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation),...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Chris, Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana, Cload, Bruce, Stirling, Alena, Davis, Philip J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cureus 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761240
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3688
_version_ 1783393988010573824
author Bell, Chris
Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana
Cload, Bruce
Stirling, Alena
Davis, Philip J
author_facet Bell, Chris
Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana
Cload, Bruce
Stirling, Alena
Davis, Philip J
author_sort Bell, Chris
collection PubMed
description Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation), as well as individual patient morbidity and mortality (through under-activation). In order to help refine the MTP activation criteria and protocols, we surveyed clinicians on acceptable over- and under-activation rates for massive transfusions. Methods We surveyed Canadian content experts in their respective fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 was comprised of trauma and acute care specialists (TACS), while Group 2 was comprised of clinical and laboratory medicine specialists (CLMS). Between-group differences were examined using Fisher’s exact test and the likelihood ratio. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results We received responses from 35 clinicians in the TACS group and 10 clinicians in the CLMS group. About half (45.7%) of respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP overactivation rate of 5% - 10% acceptable (vs. 60% of the CLMS group; not significant (NS)). Approximately one-third (34.2%) of the respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable, whereas the majority (60%) of respondents in the CLMS group considered an under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable (NS). A significantly greater proportion of respondents in the TACS group felt that an anticipated need for > 20 units of packed red blood cells within the next 24 hours was an acceptable criterion for MTP activation. Respondents in the CLMS group were more likely to consider “poor communication” as a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion Similarities in acceptable MTP over- and under-activation rates were noted across specialties. Collaboration between involved parties is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Cureus
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63684272019-02-13 Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View Bell, Chris Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana Cload, Bruce Stirling, Alena Davis, Philip J Cureus Anesthesiology Background Massive transfusion protocols (MTP) aid in the efficient delivery of blood components to rapidly exsanguinating patients. Unfortunately, clinical gestalt and currently available clinical scoring systems lack the optimal accuracy to prevent blood product wastage (through over-activation), as well as individual patient morbidity and mortality (through under-activation). In order to help refine the MTP activation criteria and protocols, we surveyed clinicians on acceptable over- and under-activation rates for massive transfusions. Methods We surveyed Canadian content experts in their respective fields, using a snowball survey technique. Respondents were categorized into two groups: Group 1 was comprised of trauma and acute care specialists (TACS), while Group 2 was comprised of clinical and laboratory medicine specialists (CLMS). Between-group differences were examined using Fisher’s exact test and the likelihood ratio. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Results We received responses from 35 clinicians in the TACS group and 10 clinicians in the CLMS group. About half (45.7%) of respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP overactivation rate of 5% - 10% acceptable (vs. 60% of the CLMS group; not significant (NS)). Approximately one-third (34.2%) of the respondents in the TACS group considered an MTP under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable, whereas the majority (60%) of respondents in the CLMS group considered an under-activation rate of less than 5% acceptable (NS). A significantly greater proportion of respondents in the TACS group felt that an anticipated need for > 20 units of packed red blood cells within the next 24 hours was an acceptable criterion for MTP activation. Respondents in the CLMS group were more likely to consider “poor communication” as a reason for blood component wastage. Conclusion Similarities in acceptable MTP over- and under-activation rates were noted across specialties. Collaboration between involved parties is necessary for MTP protocol development to improve patient outcomes and reduce blood wastage. Cureus 2018-12-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6368427/ /pubmed/30761240 http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3688 Text en Copyright © 2018, Bell et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Anesthesiology
Bell, Chris
Prokopchuk-Gauk, Oksana
Cload, Bruce
Stirling, Alena
Davis, Philip J
Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View
title Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View
title_full Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View
title_fullStr Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View
title_full_unstemmed Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View
title_short Optimum Accuracy of Massive Transfusion Protocol Activation: The Clinician’s View
title_sort optimum accuracy of massive transfusion protocol activation: the clinician’s view
topic Anesthesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30761240
http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.3688
work_keys_str_mv AT bellchris optimumaccuracyofmassivetransfusionprotocolactivationthecliniciansview
AT prokopchukgaukoksana optimumaccuracyofmassivetransfusionprotocolactivationthecliniciansview
AT cloadbruce optimumaccuracyofmassivetransfusionprotocolactivationthecliniciansview
AT stirlingalena optimumaccuracyofmassivetransfusionprotocolactivationthecliniciansview
AT davisphilipj optimumaccuracyofmassivetransfusionprotocolactivationthecliniciansview