Cargando…

Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study

Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aime...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xie, Yizhao, Zhao, Yannan, Gong, Chengcheng, Chen, Zhanhong, Zhang, Yinbin, Zhao, Yanxia, Yuan, Peng, Hu, Sainan, Li, Yi, Hu, Xichun, Zhang, Jian, Wang, Leiping, Wang, Biyun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z
_version_ 1783394022673350656
author Xie, Yizhao
Zhao, Yannan
Gong, Chengcheng
Chen, Zhanhong
Zhang, Yinbin
Zhao, Yanxia
Yuan, Peng
Hu, Sainan
Li, Yi
Hu, Xichun
Zhang, Jian
Wang, Leiping
Wang, Biyun
author_facet Xie, Yizhao
Zhao, Yannan
Gong, Chengcheng
Chen, Zhanhong
Zhang, Yinbin
Zhao, Yanxia
Yuan, Peng
Hu, Sainan
Li, Yi
Hu, Xichun
Zhang, Jian
Wang, Leiping
Wang, Biyun
author_sort Xie, Yizhao
collection PubMed
description Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aimed to investigate the profile of daily practice regarding therapy after Ful. A consecutive series of 131 HR+, HER2- MBC patients who failed Ful 500 mg as first-line or second-line therapy from June 2014 to June 2017 in 6 institutions were included and analysed. Among 131 patients who failed Ful with similar baseline characteristics, 31 (23.7%) received endocrine therapy (ET), and 100 (76.3%) were treated with chemotherapy (CT). The most frequently applied CT regimen was capecitabine (32%), and the ET regimen was exemestane + everolimus (35.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone-only metastasis were associated with lower CT use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 1.51–41.84, P = 0.01). Among patients who received CT and ET as subsequent treatments, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.2–8.8) and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1–7.9), respectively (p = 0.03). Among patients who were resistant to Ful (PFS < 6 months), the PFS on CT was significantly longer than that on ET (7.1 months vs 3.9 months, p = 0.024, HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.26–0.97); however, among patients with a PFS ≥6 months on Ful, the efficacy of CT and ET was similar. Additionally, among patients with an older age, bone-only metastasis and ≥3 metastatic sites, no significant difference was observed between the CT and ET groups. Moreover, ET was much more tolerated than CT in terms of the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities (9.6% vs 27%, P < 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Thus, our findings reveal the pattern of post-Ful treatment in current clinical practice and provide evidence on the efficacy, safety and choice of these treatments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63686242019-02-14 Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study Xie, Yizhao Zhao, Yannan Gong, Chengcheng Chen, Zhanhong Zhang, Yinbin Zhao, Yanxia Yuan, Peng Hu, Sainan Li, Yi Hu, Xichun Zhang, Jian Wang, Leiping Wang, Biyun Sci Rep Article Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aimed to investigate the profile of daily practice regarding therapy after Ful. A consecutive series of 131 HR+, HER2- MBC patients who failed Ful 500 mg as first-line or second-line therapy from June 2014 to June 2017 in 6 institutions were included and analysed. Among 131 patients who failed Ful with similar baseline characteristics, 31 (23.7%) received endocrine therapy (ET), and 100 (76.3%) were treated with chemotherapy (CT). The most frequently applied CT regimen was capecitabine (32%), and the ET regimen was exemestane + everolimus (35.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone-only metastasis were associated with lower CT use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 1.51–41.84, P = 0.01). Among patients who received CT and ET as subsequent treatments, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.2–8.8) and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1–7.9), respectively (p = 0.03). Among patients who were resistant to Ful (PFS < 6 months), the PFS on CT was significantly longer than that on ET (7.1 months vs 3.9 months, p = 0.024, HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.26–0.97); however, among patients with a PFS ≥6 months on Ful, the efficacy of CT and ET was similar. Additionally, among patients with an older age, bone-only metastasis and ≥3 metastatic sites, no significant difference was observed between the CT and ET groups. Moreover, ET was much more tolerated than CT in terms of the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities (9.6% vs 27%, P < 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Thus, our findings reveal the pattern of post-Ful treatment in current clinical practice and provide evidence on the efficacy, safety and choice of these treatments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368624/ /pubmed/30737426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Xie, Yizhao
Zhao, Yannan
Gong, Chengcheng
Chen, Zhanhong
Zhang, Yinbin
Zhao, Yanxia
Yuan, Peng
Hu, Sainan
Li, Yi
Hu, Xichun
Zhang, Jian
Wang, Leiping
Wang, Biyun
Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
title Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
title_full Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
title_fullStr Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
title_full_unstemmed Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
title_short Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
title_sort treatment after progression on fulvestrant among metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical practice: a multicenter, retrospective study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737426
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z
work_keys_str_mv AT xieyizhao treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaoyannan treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT gongchengcheng treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT chenzhanhong treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhangyinbin treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhaoyanxia treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT yuanpeng treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT husainan treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT liyi treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT huxichun treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT zhangjian treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT wangleiping treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy
AT wangbiyun treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy