Cargando…
Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study
Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aime...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z |
_version_ | 1783394022673350656 |
---|---|
author | Xie, Yizhao Zhao, Yannan Gong, Chengcheng Chen, Zhanhong Zhang, Yinbin Zhao, Yanxia Yuan, Peng Hu, Sainan Li, Yi Hu, Xichun Zhang, Jian Wang, Leiping Wang, Biyun |
author_facet | Xie, Yizhao Zhao, Yannan Gong, Chengcheng Chen, Zhanhong Zhang, Yinbin Zhao, Yanxia Yuan, Peng Hu, Sainan Li, Yi Hu, Xichun Zhang, Jian Wang, Leiping Wang, Biyun |
author_sort | Xie, Yizhao |
collection | PubMed |
description | Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aimed to investigate the profile of daily practice regarding therapy after Ful. A consecutive series of 131 HR+, HER2- MBC patients who failed Ful 500 mg as first-line or second-line therapy from June 2014 to June 2017 in 6 institutions were included and analysed. Among 131 patients who failed Ful with similar baseline characteristics, 31 (23.7%) received endocrine therapy (ET), and 100 (76.3%) were treated with chemotherapy (CT). The most frequently applied CT regimen was capecitabine (32%), and the ET regimen was exemestane + everolimus (35.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone-only metastasis were associated with lower CT use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 1.51–41.84, P = 0.01). Among patients who received CT and ET as subsequent treatments, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.2–8.8) and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1–7.9), respectively (p = 0.03). Among patients who were resistant to Ful (PFS < 6 months), the PFS on CT was significantly longer than that on ET (7.1 months vs 3.9 months, p = 0.024, HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.26–0.97); however, among patients with a PFS ≥6 months on Ful, the efficacy of CT and ET was similar. Additionally, among patients with an older age, bone-only metastasis and ≥3 metastatic sites, no significant difference was observed between the CT and ET groups. Moreover, ET was much more tolerated than CT in terms of the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities (9.6% vs 27%, P < 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Thus, our findings reveal the pattern of post-Ful treatment in current clinical practice and provide evidence on the efficacy, safety and choice of these treatments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6368624 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63686242019-02-14 Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study Xie, Yizhao Zhao, Yannan Gong, Chengcheng Chen, Zhanhong Zhang, Yinbin Zhao, Yanxia Yuan, Peng Hu, Sainan Li, Yi Hu, Xichun Zhang, Jian Wang, Leiping Wang, Biyun Sci Rep Article Fulvestrant (Ful) is an effective and widely used agent for first- and second-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-negative (HR+/HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, there is no evidence of treatment after progression on Ful. Our study aimed to investigate the profile of daily practice regarding therapy after Ful. A consecutive series of 131 HR+, HER2- MBC patients who failed Ful 500 mg as first-line or second-line therapy from June 2014 to June 2017 in 6 institutions were included and analysed. Among 131 patients who failed Ful with similar baseline characteristics, 31 (23.7%) received endocrine therapy (ET), and 100 (76.3%) were treated with chemotherapy (CT). The most frequently applied CT regimen was capecitabine (32%), and the ET regimen was exemestane + everolimus (35.5%). Multivariate analysis showed that patients with bone-only metastasis were associated with lower CT use (OR = 7.97, 95% CI 1.51–41.84, P = 0.01). Among patients who received CT and ET as subsequent treatments, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 months (95% CI 6.2–8.8) and 6.0 months (95% CI 4.1–7.9), respectively (p = 0.03). Among patients who were resistant to Ful (PFS < 6 months), the PFS on CT was significantly longer than that on ET (7.1 months vs 3.9 months, p = 0.024, HR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.26–0.97); however, among patients with a PFS ≥6 months on Ful, the efficacy of CT and ET was similar. Additionally, among patients with an older age, bone-only metastasis and ≥3 metastatic sites, no significant difference was observed between the CT and ET groups. Moreover, ET was much more tolerated than CT in terms of the incidence of grade 3/4 toxicities (9.6% vs 27%, P < 0.05). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached. Thus, our findings reveal the pattern of post-Ful treatment in current clinical practice and provide evidence on the efficacy, safety and choice of these treatments. Nature Publishing Group UK 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368624/ /pubmed/30737426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Xie, Yizhao Zhao, Yannan Gong, Chengcheng Chen, Zhanhong Zhang, Yinbin Zhao, Yanxia Yuan, Peng Hu, Sainan Li, Yi Hu, Xichun Zhang, Jian Wang, Leiping Wang, Biyun Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study |
title | Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study |
title_full | Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study |
title_fullStr | Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study |
title_short | Treatment after Progression on Fulvestrant among Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients in Clinical Practice: a Multicenter, Retrospective Study |
title_sort | treatment after progression on fulvestrant among metastatic breast cancer patients in clinical practice: a multicenter, retrospective study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368624/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30737426 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37472-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xieyizhao treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT zhaoyannan treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT gongchengcheng treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT chenzhanhong treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT zhangyinbin treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT zhaoyanxia treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT yuanpeng treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT husainan treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT liyi treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT huxichun treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT zhangjian treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT wangleiping treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy AT wangbiyun treatmentafterprogressiononfulvestrantamongmetastaticbreastcancerpatientsinclinicalpracticeamulticenterretrospectivestudy |