Cargando…
Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
BACKGROUND: Both high socioeconomic status (SES) and high physical activity (PA) are associated with better self-rated health (SRH) and higher quality-of-life (QoL). AIM: To investigate whether high levels of PA may compensate for the association between low SES and subjective health outcomes in ter...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4 |
_version_ | 1783394054201933824 |
---|---|
author | Johansson, Lisbeth M. Lingfors, Hans Golsäter, Marie Kristenson, Margareta Fransson, Eleonor I. |
author_facet | Johansson, Lisbeth M. Lingfors, Hans Golsäter, Marie Kristenson, Margareta Fransson, Eleonor I. |
author_sort | Johansson, Lisbeth M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Both high socioeconomic status (SES) and high physical activity (PA) are associated with better self-rated health (SRH) and higher quality-of-life (QoL). AIM: To investigate whether high levels of PA may compensate for the association between low SES and subjective health outcomes in terms of poorer SRH and lower QoL. METHOD: Data from a cross-sectional, population-based study (n = 5326) was utilized. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations between indicators of SES (economic situation and educational level), SRH and QoL, as well as between the combination of SES and PA in relation to SRH and QoL. RESULT: Participants with high PA and economic problems had approximately the same OR for good SRH as those with low PA and without economic problems (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.20–2.54] and 1.81 [1.25–2.63] respectively). Participants with high PA and low education had higher odds for good SRH (OR 3.34 [2.96–5.34] compared to those with low PA and high education (OR 1.46 [0.89–2.39]).Those with high PA and economic problems had an OR of 2.09 [1.42–3.08], for high QoL, while the corresponding OR for those with low PA and without economic problems was 4.38 [2.89–6.63]. CONCLUSION: Physically active people with low SES, had the same or even better odds to report good SRH compared to those with low PA and high SES. For QoL the result was not as consistent. The findings highlight the potential for promotion of PA to reduce SES-based inequalities in SRH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6368755 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63687552019-02-15 Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? Johansson, Lisbeth M. Lingfors, Hans Golsäter, Marie Kristenson, Margareta Fransson, Eleonor I. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Both high socioeconomic status (SES) and high physical activity (PA) are associated with better self-rated health (SRH) and higher quality-of-life (QoL). AIM: To investigate whether high levels of PA may compensate for the association between low SES and subjective health outcomes in terms of poorer SRH and lower QoL. METHOD: Data from a cross-sectional, population-based study (n = 5326) was utilized. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations between indicators of SES (economic situation and educational level), SRH and QoL, as well as between the combination of SES and PA in relation to SRH and QoL. RESULT: Participants with high PA and economic problems had approximately the same OR for good SRH as those with low PA and without economic problems (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.20–2.54] and 1.81 [1.25–2.63] respectively). Participants with high PA and low education had higher odds for good SRH (OR 3.34 [2.96–5.34] compared to those with low PA and high education (OR 1.46 [0.89–2.39]).Those with high PA and economic problems had an OR of 2.09 [1.42–3.08], for high QoL, while the corresponding OR for those with low PA and without economic problems was 4.38 [2.89–6.63]. CONCLUSION: Physically active people with low SES, had the same or even better odds to report good SRH compared to those with low PA and high SES. For QoL the result was not as consistent. The findings highlight the potential for promotion of PA to reduce SES-based inequalities in SRH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368755/ /pubmed/30736815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Johansson, Lisbeth M. Lingfors, Hans Golsäter, Marie Kristenson, Margareta Fransson, Eleonor I. Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
title | Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
title_full | Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
title_fullStr | Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
title_short | Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
title_sort | can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368755/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johanssonlisbethm canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife AT lingforshans canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife AT golsatermarie canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife AT kristensonmargareta canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife AT franssoneleonori canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife |