Cargando…

Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?

BACKGROUND: Both high socioeconomic status (SES) and high physical activity (PA) are associated with better self-rated health (SRH) and higher quality-of-life (QoL). AIM: To investigate whether high levels of PA may compensate for the association between low SES and subjective health outcomes in ter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johansson, Lisbeth M., Lingfors, Hans, Golsäter, Marie, Kristenson, Margareta, Fransson, Eleonor I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4
_version_ 1783394054201933824
author Johansson, Lisbeth M.
Lingfors, Hans
Golsäter, Marie
Kristenson, Margareta
Fransson, Eleonor I.
author_facet Johansson, Lisbeth M.
Lingfors, Hans
Golsäter, Marie
Kristenson, Margareta
Fransson, Eleonor I.
author_sort Johansson, Lisbeth M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Both high socioeconomic status (SES) and high physical activity (PA) are associated with better self-rated health (SRH) and higher quality-of-life (QoL). AIM: To investigate whether high levels of PA may compensate for the association between low SES and subjective health outcomes in terms of poorer SRH and lower QoL. METHOD: Data from a cross-sectional, population-based study (n = 5326) was utilized. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations between indicators of SES (economic situation and educational level), SRH and QoL, as well as between the combination of SES and PA in relation to SRH and QoL. RESULT: Participants with high PA and economic problems had approximately the same OR for good SRH as those with low PA and without economic problems (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.20–2.54] and 1.81 [1.25–2.63] respectively). Participants with high PA and low education had higher odds for good SRH (OR 3.34 [2.96–5.34] compared to those with low PA and high education (OR 1.46 [0.89–2.39]).Those with high PA and economic problems had an OR of 2.09 [1.42–3.08], for high QoL, while the corresponding OR for those with low PA and without economic problems was 4.38 [2.89–6.63]. CONCLUSION: Physically active people with low SES, had the same or even better odds to report good SRH compared to those with low PA and high SES. For QoL the result was not as consistent. The findings highlight the potential for promotion of PA to reduce SES-based inequalities in SRH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368755
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63687552019-02-15 Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life? Johansson, Lisbeth M. Lingfors, Hans Golsäter, Marie Kristenson, Margareta Fransson, Eleonor I. Health Qual Life Outcomes Research BACKGROUND: Both high socioeconomic status (SES) and high physical activity (PA) are associated with better self-rated health (SRH) and higher quality-of-life (QoL). AIM: To investigate whether high levels of PA may compensate for the association between low SES and subjective health outcomes in terms of poorer SRH and lower QoL. METHOD: Data from a cross-sectional, population-based study (n = 5326) was utilized. Multiple logistic regression models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for the associations between indicators of SES (economic situation and educational level), SRH and QoL, as well as between the combination of SES and PA in relation to SRH and QoL. RESULT: Participants with high PA and economic problems had approximately the same OR for good SRH as those with low PA and without economic problems (OR 1.75 [95% CI 1.20–2.54] and 1.81 [1.25–2.63] respectively). Participants with high PA and low education had higher odds for good SRH (OR 3.34 [2.96–5.34] compared to those with low PA and high education (OR 1.46 [0.89–2.39]).Those with high PA and economic problems had an OR of 2.09 [1.42–3.08], for high QoL, while the corresponding OR for those with low PA and without economic problems was 4.38 [2.89–6.63]. CONCLUSION: Physically active people with low SES, had the same or even better odds to report good SRH compared to those with low PA and high SES. For QoL the result was not as consistent. The findings highlight the potential for promotion of PA to reduce SES-based inequalities in SRH. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-08 /pmc/articles/PMC6368755/ /pubmed/30736815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Johansson, Lisbeth M.
Lingfors, Hans
Golsäter, Marie
Kristenson, Margareta
Fransson, Eleonor I.
Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
title Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
title_full Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
title_fullStr Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
title_full_unstemmed Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
title_short Can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
title_sort can physical activity compensate for low socioeconomic status with regard to poor self-rated health and low quality-of-life?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368755/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30736815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12955-019-1102-4
work_keys_str_mv AT johanssonlisbethm canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife
AT lingforshans canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife
AT golsatermarie canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife
AT kristensonmargareta canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife
AT franssoneleonori canphysicalactivitycompensateforlowsocioeconomicstatuswithregardtopoorselfratedhealthandlowqualityoflife