Cargando…

Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer

Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were fur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aktemur Türker, Sevinç, Uzunoğlu, Emel, Purali, Nuhan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774797
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046
_version_ 1783394088440037376
author Aktemur Türker, Sevinç
Uzunoğlu, Emel
Purali, Nuhan
author_facet Aktemur Türker, Sevinç
Uzunoğlu, Emel
Purali, Nuhan
author_sort Aktemur Türker, Sevinç
collection PubMed
description Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the sealer tested: AH 26, BioRoot RCS and MTA Plus. Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and the relevant sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from the mid-third area of each root. Two slices were selected for the push-out test and the remaining slice was used to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage. Results. The retention of MTA Plus and BioRoot RCS was higher than that of AH 26 when the smear layer was preserved (P<0.05). BioRoot RCS showed the lowest penetration depth when the smear layer was removed (P<0.05). Conclusion. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers had a limited effect on their adhesion to root canal wall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6368950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63689502019-02-15 Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer Aktemur Türker, Sevinç Uzunoğlu, Emel Purali, Nuhan J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the sealer tested: AH 26, BioRoot RCS and MTA Plus. Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and the relevant sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from the mid-third area of each root. Two slices were selected for the push-out test and the remaining slice was used to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage. Results. The retention of MTA Plus and BioRoot RCS was higher than that of AH 26 when the smear layer was preserved (P<0.05). BioRoot RCS showed the lowest penetration depth when the smear layer was removed (P<0.05). Conclusion. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers had a limited effect on their adhesion to root canal wall. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6368950/ /pubmed/30774797 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046 Text en © 2018 Türker & Uzunoĝlu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Aktemur Türker, Sevinç
Uzunoğlu, Emel
Purali, Nuhan
Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
title Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
title_full Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
title_fullStr Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
title_short Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
title_sort evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of ah 26, bioroot rcs, and mta plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774797
http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046
work_keys_str_mv AT aktemurturkersevinc evaluationofdentinaltubulepenetrationdepthandpushoutbondstrengthofah26biorootrcsandmtaplusrootcanalsealersinpresenceorabsenceofsmearlayer
AT uzunogluemel evaluationofdentinaltubulepenetrationdepthandpushoutbondstrengthofah26biorootrcsandmtaplusrootcanalsealersinpresenceorabsenceofsmearlayer
AT puralinuhan evaluationofdentinaltubulepenetrationdepthandpushoutbondstrengthofah26biorootrcsandmtaplusrootcanalsealersinpresenceorabsenceofsmearlayer