Cargando…
Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer
Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were fur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774797 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046 |
_version_ | 1783394088440037376 |
---|---|
author | Aktemur Türker, Sevinç Uzunoğlu, Emel Purali, Nuhan |
author_facet | Aktemur Türker, Sevinç Uzunoğlu, Emel Purali, Nuhan |
author_sort | Aktemur Türker, Sevinç |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the sealer tested: AH 26, BioRoot RCS and MTA Plus. Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and the relevant sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from the mid-third area of each root. Two slices were selected for the push-out test and the remaining slice was used to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage. Results. The retention of MTA Plus and BioRoot RCS was higher than that of AH 26 when the smear layer was preserved (P<0.05). BioRoot RCS showed the lowest penetration depth when the smear layer was removed (P<0.05). Conclusion. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers had a limited effect on their adhesion to root canal wall. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6368950 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | Tabriz University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63689502019-02-15 Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer Aktemur Türker, Sevinç Uzunoğlu, Emel Purali, Nuhan J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects Original Article Background. This study compared the effect of smear layer on the penetration depth and push-out bond strength of various root canal sealers. Methods. A total of 90 extracted human mandibular premolars were assigned into 2 groups: smear layer preserved and smear layer removed. Then the roots were further divided into 3 subgroups according to the sealer tested: AH 26, BioRoot RCS and MTA Plus. Obturation was performed with gutta-percha and the relevant sealer was mixed with 0.1% rhodamine B. Three 1-mm-thick slices were obtained from the mid-third area of each root. Two slices were selected for the push-out test and the remaining slice was used to calculate the dentinal tubule penetration depth and percentage. Results. The retention of MTA Plus and BioRoot RCS was higher than that of AH 26 when the smear layer was preserved (P<0.05). BioRoot RCS showed the lowest penetration depth when the smear layer was removed (P<0.05). Conclusion. Dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers had a limited effect on their adhesion to root canal wall. Tabriz University of Medical Sciences 2018 2018-12-19 /pmc/articles/PMC6368950/ /pubmed/30774797 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046 Text en © 2018 Türker & Uzunoĝlu. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article published and distributed by Tabriz University of Medical Sciences under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Aktemur Türker, Sevinç Uzunoğlu, Emel Purali, Nuhan Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
title | Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
title_full | Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
title_short | Evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of AH 26, BioRoot RCS, and MTA Plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
title_sort | evaluation of dentinal tubule penetration depth and push-out bond strength of ah 26, bioroot rcs, and mta plus root canal sealers in presence or absence of smear layer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6368950/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774797 http://dx.doi.org/10.15171/joddd.2018.046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT aktemurturkersevinc evaluationofdentinaltubulepenetrationdepthandpushoutbondstrengthofah26biorootrcsandmtaplusrootcanalsealersinpresenceorabsenceofsmearlayer AT uzunogluemel evaluationofdentinaltubulepenetrationdepthandpushoutbondstrengthofah26biorootrcsandmtaplusrootcanalsealersinpresenceorabsenceofsmearlayer AT puralinuhan evaluationofdentinaltubulepenetrationdepthandpushoutbondstrengthofah26biorootrcsandmtaplusrootcanalsealersinpresenceorabsenceofsmearlayer |