Cargando…

Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada

PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research is a course designed and piloted in Canada to help patients, researchers, health care professionals and health system decision-makers gain an introductory understanding of patient-oriented research, the research enterprise, and how to w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bell, Tim, Vat, Lidewij Eva, McGavin, Colleen, Keller, Malori, Getchell, Leah, Rychtera, Anna, Fernandez, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0141-7
_version_ 1783394213076926464
author Bell, Tim
Vat, Lidewij Eva
McGavin, Colleen
Keller, Malori
Getchell, Leah
Rychtera, Anna
Fernandez, Nicolas
author_facet Bell, Tim
Vat, Lidewij Eva
McGavin, Colleen
Keller, Malori
Getchell, Leah
Rychtera, Anna
Fernandez, Nicolas
author_sort Bell, Tim
collection PubMed
description PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research is a course designed and piloted in Canada to help patients, researchers, health care professionals and health system decision-makers gain an introductory understanding of patient-oriented research, the research enterprise, and how to work in a team. The course curriculum was co-developed by a diverse group of people with different lived experiences and relevant expertise. The course is meant to be delivered in a ‘co-learning format’ with classes comprised of all the above stakeholder groups learning together. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of the project leaders, developers, facilitators and patient co-facilitators who were involved in the process of co-developing, piloting and revising the curriculum. Our findings suggest that co-developing a patient-oriented research curriculum increases its quality, uptake and credibility. The co-development process not only resulted in training that benefited the target learners, but it provided valuable learning experiences about patient-oriented research for the project leaders, developers, facilitators and patient co-facilitators. These findings and the resulting recommendations may provide guidance for other learning and development groups wishing to undertake a similar project. ABSTRACT: Background Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research is a course designed and piloted in Canada to build mutually beneficial relationships for conducting patient-oriented research by ensuring that relevant stakeholders – patients, researchers, health care professionals and health system decision-makers – have a common foundational understanding of patient-oriented research, the research enterprise, and team dynamics. The curriculum was co-developed by a group of patients, researchers, patient engagement experts and curriculum development experts and involved consultations with broader groups of the relevant stakeholders mentioned above. It was designed to be delivered in a ‘co-learning format’ with classes comprised of all stakeholder groups learning together. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of individuals involved in the process of co-developing, piloting and revising Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research. Methods An embedded case study was conducted with individuals who were involved in the co-development, pilot and revision of Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research. These individuals took on different roles during the curriculum development process, including project co-lead, developer, facilitator, and patient co-facilitator. The constant comparison method was used to inductively develop themes from the two focus group sessions. Results Discussions from the focus groups revealed the value of co-building the content, co-facilitating the course sessions, and the importance of the co-learning format. The training itself was perceived as valuable and the systematic approach to co-development was perceived as a success. Several barriers were identified, including the amount of resources, time and commitment required to complete the project. There was a notable tension between maintaining the integrity of the content and having the freedom to adapt it to local contexts. Over the course of the project, the project co-leads, developers and facilitators found that their own understanding of patient-oriented research deepened. Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that co-developing a patient-oriented research curriculum increases its quality, uptake and credibility. The co-development process not only resulted in training that benefited the target learners, but also built capacity for patient-oriented research within the project co-leads, developers, facilitators and patient co-facilitators. Our findings and recommendations may provide guidance for other learning and development groups wishing to undertake a similar project. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40900-019-0141-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6369555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63695552019-02-20 Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada Bell, Tim Vat, Lidewij Eva McGavin, Colleen Keller, Malori Getchell, Leah Rychtera, Anna Fernandez, Nicolas Res Involv Engagem Research Article PLAIN ENGLISH SUMMARY: Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research is a course designed and piloted in Canada to help patients, researchers, health care professionals and health system decision-makers gain an introductory understanding of patient-oriented research, the research enterprise, and how to work in a team. The course curriculum was co-developed by a diverse group of people with different lived experiences and relevant expertise. The course is meant to be delivered in a ‘co-learning format’ with classes comprised of all the above stakeholder groups learning together. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of the project leaders, developers, facilitators and patient co-facilitators who were involved in the process of co-developing, piloting and revising the curriculum. Our findings suggest that co-developing a patient-oriented research curriculum increases its quality, uptake and credibility. The co-development process not only resulted in training that benefited the target learners, but it provided valuable learning experiences about patient-oriented research for the project leaders, developers, facilitators and patient co-facilitators. These findings and the resulting recommendations may provide guidance for other learning and development groups wishing to undertake a similar project. ABSTRACT: Background Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research is a course designed and piloted in Canada to build mutually beneficial relationships for conducting patient-oriented research by ensuring that relevant stakeholders – patients, researchers, health care professionals and health system decision-makers – have a common foundational understanding of patient-oriented research, the research enterprise, and team dynamics. The curriculum was co-developed by a group of patients, researchers, patient engagement experts and curriculum development experts and involved consultations with broader groups of the relevant stakeholders mentioned above. It was designed to be delivered in a ‘co-learning format’ with classes comprised of all stakeholder groups learning together. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of individuals involved in the process of co-developing, piloting and revising Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research. Methods An embedded case study was conducted with individuals who were involved in the co-development, pilot and revision of Foundations in Patient-Oriented Research. These individuals took on different roles during the curriculum development process, including project co-lead, developer, facilitator, and patient co-facilitator. The constant comparison method was used to inductively develop themes from the two focus group sessions. Results Discussions from the focus groups revealed the value of co-building the content, co-facilitating the course sessions, and the importance of the co-learning format. The training itself was perceived as valuable and the systematic approach to co-development was perceived as a success. Several barriers were identified, including the amount of resources, time and commitment required to complete the project. There was a notable tension between maintaining the integrity of the content and having the freedom to adapt it to local contexts. Over the course of the project, the project co-leads, developers and facilitators found that their own understanding of patient-oriented research deepened. Conclusions The findings of this study suggest that co-developing a patient-oriented research curriculum increases its quality, uptake and credibility. The co-development process not only resulted in training that benefited the target learners, but also built capacity for patient-oriented research within the project co-leads, developers, facilitators and patient co-facilitators. Our findings and recommendations may provide guidance for other learning and development groups wishing to undertake a similar project. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1186/s40900-019-0141-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2019-02-11 /pmc/articles/PMC6369555/ /pubmed/30788148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0141-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bell, Tim
Vat, Lidewij Eva
McGavin, Colleen
Keller, Malori
Getchell, Leah
Rychtera, Anna
Fernandez, Nicolas
Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada
title Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada
title_full Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada
title_fullStr Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada
title_full_unstemmed Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada
title_short Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada
title_sort co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in canada
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30788148
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40900-019-0141-7
work_keys_str_mv AT belltim cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada
AT vatlidewijeva cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada
AT mcgavincolleen cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada
AT kellermalori cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada
AT getchellleah cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada
AT rychteraanna cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada
AT fernandeznicolas cobuildingapatientorientedresearchcurriculumincanada