Cargando…

Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme

The use of standard enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques allows for the improvement of oilfield performance after waterflooding processes. Chemical EOR methods modify different properties of fluids and/or rock to mobilize the remaining oil. Moreover, combined techniques have been developed to maxi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Druetta, Pablo, Picchioni, Francesco
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2018
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02900
_version_ 1783394236455976960
author Druetta, Pablo
Picchioni, Francesco
author_facet Druetta, Pablo
Picchioni, Francesco
author_sort Druetta, Pablo
collection PubMed
description The use of standard enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques allows for the improvement of oilfield performance after waterflooding processes. Chemical EOR methods modify different properties of fluids and/or rock to mobilize the remaining oil. Moreover, combined techniques have been developed to maximize the performance by using the joint properties of the chemical slugs. A new simulator is presented to study a surfactant–polymer flooding, based on a two-phase, five-component system (aqueous and oleous phases with water, petroleum, polymer, surfactant, and salt) for a 2D reservoir model. The physical properties modified by these chemicals are considered as well as the synergy between them. The analysis of the chemical injection strategy is deemed vital for the success of the operations. This plays a major role in the efficiency of the recovery process, including the order and the time gap between each chemical slug injection. As the latter is increased, the flooding tends to behave as two separate processes. Best results are found when both slugs are injected overlapped, with the polymer in first place which improves the sweeping efficiency of the viscous oil. This simulator can be used to study different chemical combinations and their injection procedure to optimize the EOR process.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6369668
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63696682019-02-14 Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme Druetta, Pablo Picchioni, Francesco Energy Fuels The use of standard enhanced oil recovery (EOR) techniques allows for the improvement of oilfield performance after waterflooding processes. Chemical EOR methods modify different properties of fluids and/or rock to mobilize the remaining oil. Moreover, combined techniques have been developed to maximize the performance by using the joint properties of the chemical slugs. A new simulator is presented to study a surfactant–polymer flooding, based on a two-phase, five-component system (aqueous and oleous phases with water, petroleum, polymer, surfactant, and salt) for a 2D reservoir model. The physical properties modified by these chemicals are considered as well as the synergy between them. The analysis of the chemical injection strategy is deemed vital for the success of the operations. This plays a major role in the efficiency of the recovery process, including the order and the time gap between each chemical slug injection. As the latter is increased, the flooding tends to behave as two separate processes. Best results are found when both slugs are injected overlapped, with the polymer in first place which improves the sweeping efficiency of the viscous oil. This simulator can be used to study different chemical combinations and their injection procedure to optimize the EOR process. American Chemical Society 2018-10-30 2018-12-20 /pmc/articles/PMC6369668/ /pubmed/30774190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02900 Text en Copyright © 2018 American Chemical Society This is an open access article published under a Creative Commons Non-Commercial No Derivative Works (CC-BY-NC-ND) Attribution License (http://pubs.acs.org/page/policy/authorchoice_ccbyncnd_termsofuse.html) , which permits copying and redistribution of the article, and creation of adaptations, all for non-commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Druetta, Pablo
Picchioni, Francesco
Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme
title Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme
title_full Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme
title_fullStr Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme
title_full_unstemmed Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme
title_short Surfactant–Polymer Flooding: Influence of the Injection Scheme
title_sort surfactant–polymer flooding: influence of the injection scheme
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369668/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30774190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b02900
work_keys_str_mv AT druettapablo surfactantpolymerfloodinginfluenceoftheinjectionscheme
AT picchionifrancesco surfactantpolymerfloodinginfluenceoftheinjectionscheme