Cargando…

Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia

BACKGROUND. Older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El‐Jawahri, Areej, Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret, VanDusen, Harry, Traeger, Lara, Abel, Gregory A., Greer, Joseph A., Fathi, Amir, Steensma, David P., LeBlanc, Thomas W., Li, Zhigang, DeAngelo, Daniel, Wadleigh, Martha, Hobbs, Gabriela, Foster, Julia, Brunner, Andrew, Amrein, Philip, Stone, Richard M., Temel, Jennifer S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0317
_version_ 1783394272882458624
author El‐Jawahri, Areej
Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret
VanDusen, Harry
Traeger, Lara
Abel, Gregory A.
Greer, Joseph A.
Fathi, Amir
Steensma, David P.
LeBlanc, Thomas W.
Li, Zhigang
DeAngelo, Daniel
Wadleigh, Martha
Hobbs, Gabriela
Foster, Julia
Brunner, Andrew
Amrein, Philip
Stone, Richard M.
Temel, Jennifer S.
author_facet El‐Jawahri, Areej
Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret
VanDusen, Harry
Traeger, Lara
Abel, Gregory A.
Greer, Joseph A.
Fathi, Amir
Steensma, David P.
LeBlanc, Thomas W.
Li, Zhigang
DeAngelo, Daniel
Wadleigh, Martha
Hobbs, Gabriela
Foster, Julia
Brunner, Andrew
Amrein, Philip
Stone, Richard M.
Temel, Jennifer S.
author_sort El‐Jawahri, Areej
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND. Older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. However, studies of how these patients understand the risks and benefits of such treatments are lacking. METHODS. We conducted a longitudinal study of older patients newly diagnosed with AML assessing patients’ (n = 100) and oncologists’ (n = 11) perceptions of treatment‐related mortality at enrollment and prognosis at 1 month. We examined concordance between patients’ and oncologists’ perceptions using Cohen's kappa (κ < 0.10 indicates little/no concordance). RESULTS. We enrolled patients within 72 hours of initiating intensive (n = 50) or nonintensive (n = 50) chemotherapy. Whereas 91% of patients reported that they were “somewhat” to “extremely likely” to die from treatment, oncologists estimated that only 12% were at high risk of dying because of treatment (κ = −0.09). Ninety percent of patients reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured of their AML, whereas oncologists estimated this chance of cure for only 31% of patients (κ = 0.05). Among patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, 98% reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured, whereas their oncologists estimated this likelihood of cure for only 49% (κ = 0.04); among those receiving nonintensive chemotherapy and their clinicians, these proportions were 82% and 13%, respectively (κ = 0.03). Patients who indicated a lower likelihood of cure reported significantly higher depression symptoms (p = .03). CONCLUSION. Older patients with AML overestimate the risks and benefits of treatment. Interventions to facilitate communication and enhance patients’ understanding of the goals of therapy and treatment risk are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are confronted with challenging decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. A clear understanding of the likely outcome and risks of the various treatment strategies is essential for these patients to make informed decisions about their care. This article reports that older patients with AML overestimate both the risks and benefits of treatment and have substantial misperceptions about their prognosis. Interventions to enhance patients’ understanding of their prognosis and treatment risk are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6369944
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63699442019-08-01 Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia El‐Jawahri, Areej Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret VanDusen, Harry Traeger, Lara Abel, Gregory A. Greer, Joseph A. Fathi, Amir Steensma, David P. LeBlanc, Thomas W. Li, Zhigang DeAngelo, Daniel Wadleigh, Martha Hobbs, Gabriela Foster, Julia Brunner, Andrew Amrein, Philip Stone, Richard M. Temel, Jennifer S. Oncologist Symptom Management and Supportive Care BACKGROUND. Older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. However, studies of how these patients understand the risks and benefits of such treatments are lacking. METHODS. We conducted a longitudinal study of older patients newly diagnosed with AML assessing patients’ (n = 100) and oncologists’ (n = 11) perceptions of treatment‐related mortality at enrollment and prognosis at 1 month. We examined concordance between patients’ and oncologists’ perceptions using Cohen's kappa (κ < 0.10 indicates little/no concordance). RESULTS. We enrolled patients within 72 hours of initiating intensive (n = 50) or nonintensive (n = 50) chemotherapy. Whereas 91% of patients reported that they were “somewhat” to “extremely likely” to die from treatment, oncologists estimated that only 12% were at high risk of dying because of treatment (κ = −0.09). Ninety percent of patients reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured of their AML, whereas oncologists estimated this chance of cure for only 31% of patients (κ = 0.05). Among patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, 98% reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured, whereas their oncologists estimated this likelihood of cure for only 49% (κ = 0.04); among those receiving nonintensive chemotherapy and their clinicians, these proportions were 82% and 13%, respectively (κ = 0.03). Patients who indicated a lower likelihood of cure reported significantly higher depression symptoms (p = .03). CONCLUSION. Older patients with AML overestimate the risks and benefits of treatment. Interventions to facilitate communication and enhance patients’ understanding of the goals of therapy and treatment risk are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are confronted with challenging decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. A clear understanding of the likely outcome and risks of the various treatment strategies is essential for these patients to make informed decisions about their care. This article reports that older patients with AML overestimate both the risks and benefits of treatment and have substantial misperceptions about their prognosis. Interventions to enhance patients’ understanding of their prognosis and treatment risk are needed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-08-23 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6369944/ /pubmed/30139841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0317 Text en © AlphaMed Press 2018
spellingShingle Symptom Management and Supportive Care
El‐Jawahri, Areej
Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret
VanDusen, Harry
Traeger, Lara
Abel, Gregory A.
Greer, Joseph A.
Fathi, Amir
Steensma, David P.
LeBlanc, Thomas W.
Li, Zhigang
DeAngelo, Daniel
Wadleigh, Martha
Hobbs, Gabriela
Foster, Julia
Brunner, Andrew
Amrein, Philip
Stone, Richard M.
Temel, Jennifer S.
Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_fullStr Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_full_unstemmed Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_short Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
title_sort patient‐clinician discordance in perceptions of treatment risks and benefits in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia
topic Symptom Management and Supportive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369944/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139841
http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0317
work_keys_str_mv AT eljawahriareej patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT nelsonlowemargaret patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT vandusenharry patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT traegerlara patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT abelgregorya patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT greerjosepha patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT fathiamir patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT steensmadavidp patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT leblancthomasw patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT lizhigang patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT deangelodaniel patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT wadleighmartha patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT hobbsgabriela patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT fosterjulia patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT brunnerandrew patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT amreinphilip patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT stonerichardm patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia
AT temeljennifers patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia