Cargando…
Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia
BACKGROUND. Older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. H...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2018
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0317 |
_version_ | 1783394272882458624 |
---|---|
author | El‐Jawahri, Areej Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret VanDusen, Harry Traeger, Lara Abel, Gregory A. Greer, Joseph A. Fathi, Amir Steensma, David P. LeBlanc, Thomas W. Li, Zhigang DeAngelo, Daniel Wadleigh, Martha Hobbs, Gabriela Foster, Julia Brunner, Andrew Amrein, Philip Stone, Richard M. Temel, Jennifer S. |
author_facet | El‐Jawahri, Areej Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret VanDusen, Harry Traeger, Lara Abel, Gregory A. Greer, Joseph A. Fathi, Amir Steensma, David P. LeBlanc, Thomas W. Li, Zhigang DeAngelo, Daniel Wadleigh, Martha Hobbs, Gabriela Foster, Julia Brunner, Andrew Amrein, Philip Stone, Richard M. Temel, Jennifer S. |
author_sort | El‐Jawahri, Areej |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND. Older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. However, studies of how these patients understand the risks and benefits of such treatments are lacking. METHODS. We conducted a longitudinal study of older patients newly diagnosed with AML assessing patients’ (n = 100) and oncologists’ (n = 11) perceptions of treatment‐related mortality at enrollment and prognosis at 1 month. We examined concordance between patients’ and oncologists’ perceptions using Cohen's kappa (κ < 0.10 indicates little/no concordance). RESULTS. We enrolled patients within 72 hours of initiating intensive (n = 50) or nonintensive (n = 50) chemotherapy. Whereas 91% of patients reported that they were “somewhat” to “extremely likely” to die from treatment, oncologists estimated that only 12% were at high risk of dying because of treatment (κ = −0.09). Ninety percent of patients reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured of their AML, whereas oncologists estimated this chance of cure for only 31% of patients (κ = 0.05). Among patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, 98% reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured, whereas their oncologists estimated this likelihood of cure for only 49% (κ = 0.04); among those receiving nonintensive chemotherapy and their clinicians, these proportions were 82% and 13%, respectively (κ = 0.03). Patients who indicated a lower likelihood of cure reported significantly higher depression symptoms (p = .03). CONCLUSION. Older patients with AML overestimate the risks and benefits of treatment. Interventions to facilitate communication and enhance patients’ understanding of the goals of therapy and treatment risk are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are confronted with challenging decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. A clear understanding of the likely outcome and risks of the various treatment strategies is essential for these patients to make informed decisions about their care. This article reports that older patients with AML overestimate both the risks and benefits of treatment and have substantial misperceptions about their prognosis. Interventions to enhance patients’ understanding of their prognosis and treatment risk are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6369944 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2018 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63699442019-08-01 Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia El‐Jawahri, Areej Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret VanDusen, Harry Traeger, Lara Abel, Gregory A. Greer, Joseph A. Fathi, Amir Steensma, David P. LeBlanc, Thomas W. Li, Zhigang DeAngelo, Daniel Wadleigh, Martha Hobbs, Gabriela Foster, Julia Brunner, Andrew Amrein, Philip Stone, Richard M. Temel, Jennifer S. Oncologist Symptom Management and Supportive Care BACKGROUND. Older patients (≥60 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) face difficult decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. However, studies of how these patients understand the risks and benefits of such treatments are lacking. METHODS. We conducted a longitudinal study of older patients newly diagnosed with AML assessing patients’ (n = 100) and oncologists’ (n = 11) perceptions of treatment‐related mortality at enrollment and prognosis at 1 month. We examined concordance between patients’ and oncologists’ perceptions using Cohen's kappa (κ < 0.10 indicates little/no concordance). RESULTS. We enrolled patients within 72 hours of initiating intensive (n = 50) or nonintensive (n = 50) chemotherapy. Whereas 91% of patients reported that they were “somewhat” to “extremely likely” to die from treatment, oncologists estimated that only 12% were at high risk of dying because of treatment (κ = −0.09). Ninety percent of patients reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured of their AML, whereas oncologists estimated this chance of cure for only 31% of patients (κ = 0.05). Among patients receiving intensive chemotherapy, 98% reported that they were “somewhat” or “very likely” to be cured, whereas their oncologists estimated this likelihood of cure for only 49% (κ = 0.04); among those receiving nonintensive chemotherapy and their clinicians, these proportions were 82% and 13%, respectively (κ = 0.03). Patients who indicated a lower likelihood of cure reported significantly higher depression symptoms (p = .03). CONCLUSION. Older patients with AML overestimate the risks and benefits of treatment. Interventions to facilitate communication and enhance patients’ understanding of the goals of therapy and treatment risk are needed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE. Older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are confronted with challenging decisions regarding treatment with “intensive” chemotherapy that carries significant toxicity for a small chance of a cure versus “nonintensive” chemotherapy to control the disease, but with fewer side effects. A clear understanding of the likely outcome and risks of the various treatment strategies is essential for these patients to make informed decisions about their care. This article reports that older patients with AML overestimate both the risks and benefits of treatment and have substantial misperceptions about their prognosis. Interventions to enhance patients’ understanding of their prognosis and treatment risk are needed. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2018-08-23 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC6369944/ /pubmed/30139841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0317 Text en © AlphaMed Press 2018 |
spellingShingle | Symptom Management and Supportive Care El‐Jawahri, Areej Nelson‐Lowe, Margaret VanDusen, Harry Traeger, Lara Abel, Gregory A. Greer, Joseph A. Fathi, Amir Steensma, David P. LeBlanc, Thomas W. Li, Zhigang DeAngelo, Daniel Wadleigh, Martha Hobbs, Gabriela Foster, Julia Brunner, Andrew Amrein, Philip Stone, Richard M. Temel, Jennifer S. Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title | Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full | Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_fullStr | Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_short | Patient‐Clinician Discordance in Perceptions of Treatment Risks and Benefits in Older Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia |
title_sort | patient‐clinician discordance in perceptions of treatment risks and benefits in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia |
topic | Symptom Management and Supportive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6369944/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30139841 http://dx.doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0317 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT eljawahriareej patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT nelsonlowemargaret patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT vandusenharry patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT traegerlara patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT abelgregorya patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT greerjosepha patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT fathiamir patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT steensmadavidp patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT leblancthomasw patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT lizhigang patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT deangelodaniel patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT wadleighmartha patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT hobbsgabriela patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT fosterjulia patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT brunnerandrew patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT amreinphilip patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT stonerichardm patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia AT temeljennifers patientcliniciandiscordanceinperceptionsoftreatmentrisksandbenefitsinolderpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemia |