Cargando…

Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation

This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). From January 2006 to December 2012, 644 pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Qiaofang, Zhu, Shuchai, Li, Shuguang, Deng, Wenzhao
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30653123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014080
_version_ 1783394300761997312
author Li, Qiaofang
Zhu, Shuchai
Li, Shuguang
Deng, Wenzhao
author_facet Li, Qiaofang
Zhu, Shuchai
Li, Shuguang
Deng, Wenzhao
author_sort Li, Qiaofang
collection PubMed
description This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). From January 2006 to December 2012, 644 patients (ENI = 157, IFI = 487) with stage I to IVa ESCC (AJCC 2010) at our institution were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify 471 (ENI = 157, IFI = 314) well-balanced patients for comparison. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of the study. After PSM, the median OS was 26.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9–35.7) for the ENI arm versus 21.5 (95% CI: 17.9–25.1) months in the IFI arm. The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS were 77.1%, 42.0%, and 26.1% for the ENI arm versus 73.2%, 32.2%, and 19.0% for the IFI arm (P = .020). ENI was a significant independent predictor of 5-year OS (1.301 [1.052–1.609]; P = .015). Furthermore, patients with stage I/II ESCC or lymph node (LN) positivity in the ENI arm had significantly better 5-year OS than their counterparts in the IFI arm. In addition, for LN positivity patients treated with definitive radiotherapy alone, ENI tended to prolong OS compared with IFI (P = .035). The 2 arms were comparable in toxicities. Using IMRT, ENI is superior to IFI in improving OS of ESCC patients, with acceptable toxicities that were comparable to those to IFI, especially for LN positivity ESCC patients treated with definitive irradiation alone. These results should be confirmed in a large randomized study comparing these 2 modalities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-6370116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-63701162019-02-22 Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation Li, Qiaofang Zhu, Shuchai Li, Shuguang Deng, Wenzhao Medicine (Baltimore) Research Article This retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of elective nodal irradiation (ENI) and involved-field irradiation (IFI) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). From January 2006 to December 2012, 644 patients (ENI = 157, IFI = 487) with stage I to IVa ESCC (AJCC 2010) at our institution were analyzed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to identify 471 (ENI = 157, IFI = 314) well-balanced patients for comparison. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome of the study. After PSM, the median OS was 26.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9–35.7) for the ENI arm versus 21.5 (95% CI: 17.9–25.1) months in the IFI arm. The 1-, 3-, 5-year OS were 77.1%, 42.0%, and 26.1% for the ENI arm versus 73.2%, 32.2%, and 19.0% for the IFI arm (P = .020). ENI was a significant independent predictor of 5-year OS (1.301 [1.052–1.609]; P = .015). Furthermore, patients with stage I/II ESCC or lymph node (LN) positivity in the ENI arm had significantly better 5-year OS than their counterparts in the IFI arm. In addition, for LN positivity patients treated with definitive radiotherapy alone, ENI tended to prolong OS compared with IFI (P = .035). The 2 arms were comparable in toxicities. Using IMRT, ENI is superior to IFI in improving OS of ESCC patients, with acceptable toxicities that were comparable to those to IFI, especially for LN positivity ESCC patients treated with definitive irradiation alone. These results should be confirmed in a large randomized study comparing these 2 modalities. Wolters Kluwer Health 2019-01-18 /pmc/articles/PMC6370116/ /pubmed/30653123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014080 Text en Copyright © 2019 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle Research Article
Li, Qiaofang
Zhu, Shuchai
Li, Shuguang
Deng, Wenzhao
Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
title Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
title_full Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
title_fullStr Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
title_full_unstemmed Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
title_short Elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
title_sort elective nodal irradiation provides a superior therapeutic modality for lymph node positivity esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients receiving definitive radiotherapy versus involved-field irradiation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30653123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014080
work_keys_str_mv AT liqiaofang electivenodalirradiationprovidesasuperiortherapeuticmodalityforlymphnodepositivityesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyversusinvolvedfieldirradiation
AT zhushuchai electivenodalirradiationprovidesasuperiortherapeuticmodalityforlymphnodepositivityesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyversusinvolvedfieldirradiation
AT lishuguang electivenodalirradiationprovidesasuperiortherapeuticmodalityforlymphnodepositivityesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyversusinvolvedfieldirradiation
AT dengwenzhao electivenodalirradiationprovidesasuperiortherapeuticmodalityforlymphnodepositivityesophagealsquamouscellcarcinomapatientsreceivingdefinitiveradiotherapyversusinvolvedfieldirradiation