Cargando…
Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
Background and Objective: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a complex and wide spread problem and is considered one of the most frequent chronic metabolic conditions during pregnancy. According to a recent consensus conference held in Italy, new technologies can play a role in the so-called pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00153 |
_version_ | 1783394401734623232 |
---|---|
author | Fantinelli, Stefania Marchetti, Daniela Verrocchio, Maria Cristina Franzago, Marica Fulcheri, Mario Vitacolonna, Ester |
author_facet | Fantinelli, Stefania Marchetti, Daniela Verrocchio, Maria Cristina Franzago, Marica Fulcheri, Mario Vitacolonna, Ester |
author_sort | Fantinelli, Stefania |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and Objective: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a complex and wide spread problem and is considered one of the most frequent chronic metabolic conditions during pregnancy. According to a recent consensus conference held in Italy, new technologies can play a role in the so-called process of fertilization of the individual's ecosystem engagement, representing support for systemic collaboration among the main actors. The current systematic review aimed at providing an update of the literature about telemedicine for GDM, considering the role of psychological dimensions such as empowerment/self-efficacy, engagement and satisfaction. Methods: The review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. The data sources were PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Results: Thirteen articles were identified as eligible and relevant for the final qualitative synthesis, but none was specific for the topic of engagement. The quality or research bias of the studies presents methodological limits. Most studies had clinical outcomes as a primary object. Concerning empowerment and self-efficacy, there were only preliminary findings reporting any improvements derived from using telemedicine approaches. Conversely, there were more consistent and positive results concerning the satisfaction of patients and clinicians. Conclusions: These results are not sufficient to state a conclusive evaluation of positive effects of telemedicine use for GDM care. A more in-depth investigation of engagement and empowerment dimensions is necessary, as some benefits for the management of chronic conditions were already detected. Further investigations will also be necessary concerning the acceptability and feasibility of telemedicine systems by clinicians. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6370698 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63706982019-02-25 Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies Fantinelli, Stefania Marchetti, Daniela Verrocchio, Maria Cristina Franzago, Marica Fulcheri, Mario Vitacolonna, Ester Front Psychol Psychology Background and Objective: Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a complex and wide spread problem and is considered one of the most frequent chronic metabolic conditions during pregnancy. According to a recent consensus conference held in Italy, new technologies can play a role in the so-called process of fertilization of the individual's ecosystem engagement, representing support for systemic collaboration among the main actors. The current systematic review aimed at providing an update of the literature about telemedicine for GDM, considering the role of psychological dimensions such as empowerment/self-efficacy, engagement and satisfaction. Methods: The review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) framework. The data sources were PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane, and Scopus databases. Results: Thirteen articles were identified as eligible and relevant for the final qualitative synthesis, but none was specific for the topic of engagement. The quality or research bias of the studies presents methodological limits. Most studies had clinical outcomes as a primary object. Concerning empowerment and self-efficacy, there were only preliminary findings reporting any improvements derived from using telemedicine approaches. Conversely, there were more consistent and positive results concerning the satisfaction of patients and clinicians. Conclusions: These results are not sufficient to state a conclusive evaluation of positive effects of telemedicine use for GDM care. A more in-depth investigation of engagement and empowerment dimensions is necessary, as some benefits for the management of chronic conditions were already detected. Further investigations will also be necessary concerning the acceptability and feasibility of telemedicine systems by clinicians. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6370698/ /pubmed/30804842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00153 Text en Copyright © 2019 Fantinelli, Marchetti, Verrocchio, Franzago, Fulcheri and Vitacolonna. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Fantinelli, Stefania Marchetti, Daniela Verrocchio, Maria Cristina Franzago, Marica Fulcheri, Mario Vitacolonna, Ester Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title | Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_full | Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_fullStr | Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_short | Assessment of Psychological Dimensions in Telemedicine Care for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Studies |
title_sort | assessment of psychological dimensions in telemedicine care for gestational diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative studies |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370698/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804842 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00153 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fantinellistefania assessmentofpsychologicaldimensionsintelemedicinecareforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewofqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT marchettidaniela assessmentofpsychologicaldimensionsintelemedicinecareforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewofqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT verrocchiomariacristina assessmentofpsychologicaldimensionsintelemedicinecareforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewofqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT franzagomarica assessmentofpsychologicaldimensionsintelemedicinecareforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewofqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT fulcherimario assessmentofpsychologicaldimensionsintelemedicinecareforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewofqualitativeandquantitativestudies AT vitacolonnaester assessmentofpsychologicaldimensionsintelemedicinecareforgestationaldiabetesmellitusasystematicreviewofqualitativeandquantitativestudies |