Cargando…
Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation
A high level of text comprehension can be achieved by engaging learners in processes of organization and integration while reading a cohesive text. In the present study, we investigated the impact of an innovative generative technique on learning with scientific texts. The cohesion generation was im...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00199 |
_version_ | 1783394404879302656 |
---|---|
author | Abel, Roman Hänze, Martin |
author_facet | Abel, Roman Hänze, Martin |
author_sort | Abel, Roman |
collection | PubMed |
description | A high level of text comprehension can be achieved by engaging learners in processes of organization and integration while reading a cohesive text. In the present study, we investigated the impact of an innovative generative technique on learning with scientific texts. The cohesion generation was implemented by means of explicit cohesion gaps. High school students (n = 199) were randomly assigned to either receive a fully cohesive scientific text (control condition) or a scientific text that required the selection of causal connectives, such as because, although, therefore, or however (generation condition). Learners in the generation condition were required to reflect on causal relations to complete the text. All students were tested immediately (T1) and 2 weeks after the learning phase (T2). Cognitive load was measured by a dual task and self-report measure. Contrary to our expectations, no differences were found in performance on inference questions (situation model). Learners in the generation condition performed worse on text-based questions at T1 but showed less forgetting from T1 to T2. The impact of condition on the situation model was moderated by reading skills. Remarkably, the generation success was highly predictive for learning outcomes even when controlling for learners’ proficiencies. Consequently, learners who succeeded to employ effortful processes to overcome the difficulty showed a superior performance on both the text-base and situation-model questions compared to students reading the cohesive text. Moreover, in these learners, generative activity led to a sustainable learning performance 2 weeks later. Poor readers especially took advantage of generative activity, despite struggling to perform the cohesion task as indicated by the cognitive load measures. The results suggest that the activity of generating causal relations can augment inferential processing in learners who are not involved in inferential processing spontaneously. To successfully apply this generative learning technique, students require considerable instructional support. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-6370711 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-63707112019-02-25 Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation Abel, Roman Hänze, Martin Front Psychol Psychology A high level of text comprehension can be achieved by engaging learners in processes of organization and integration while reading a cohesive text. In the present study, we investigated the impact of an innovative generative technique on learning with scientific texts. The cohesion generation was implemented by means of explicit cohesion gaps. High school students (n = 199) were randomly assigned to either receive a fully cohesive scientific text (control condition) or a scientific text that required the selection of causal connectives, such as because, although, therefore, or however (generation condition). Learners in the generation condition were required to reflect on causal relations to complete the text. All students were tested immediately (T1) and 2 weeks after the learning phase (T2). Cognitive load was measured by a dual task and self-report measure. Contrary to our expectations, no differences were found in performance on inference questions (situation model). Learners in the generation condition performed worse on text-based questions at T1 but showed less forgetting from T1 to T2. The impact of condition on the situation model was moderated by reading skills. Remarkably, the generation success was highly predictive for learning outcomes even when controlling for learners’ proficiencies. Consequently, learners who succeeded to employ effortful processes to overcome the difficulty showed a superior performance on both the text-base and situation-model questions compared to students reading the cohesive text. Moreover, in these learners, generative activity led to a sustainable learning performance 2 weeks later. Poor readers especially took advantage of generative activity, despite struggling to perform the cohesion task as indicated by the cognitive load measures. The results suggest that the activity of generating causal relations can augment inferential processing in learners who are not involved in inferential processing spontaneously. To successfully apply this generative learning technique, students require considerable instructional support. Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC6370711/ /pubmed/30804852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00199 Text en Copyright © 2019 Abel and Hänze. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Abel, Roman Hänze, Martin Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation |
title | Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation |
title_full | Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation |
title_fullStr | Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation |
title_full_unstemmed | Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation |
title_short | Generating Causal Relations in Scientific Texts: The Long-Term Advantages of Successful Generation |
title_sort | generating causal relations in scientific texts: the long-term advantages of successful generation |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6370711/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30804852 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00199 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abelroman generatingcausalrelationsinscientifictextsthelongtermadvantagesofsuccessfulgeneration AT hanzemartin generatingcausalrelationsinscientifictextsthelongtermadvantagesofsuccessfulgeneration |